scholarly journals Survival of Black and White Patients With Stage IV Small Cell Lung Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huashan Shi ◽  
Kexun Zhou ◽  
Jordan Cochuyt ◽  
David Hodge ◽  
Hong Qin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Academic Research ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Black And White ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Blacks And Whites ◽  
White Patients

BackgroundSmall cell lung cancer (SCLC) is associated with aggressive biology and limited treatment options, making this disease a historical challenge. The influence of race and socioeconomic status on the survival of stage IV SCLC remains mostly unknown. Our study is designed to investigate the clinical survival outcomes in Black and White patients with stage IV SCLC and study the demographic, socioeconomic, clinical features, and treatment patterns of the disease and their impact on survival in Blacks and Whites.Methods and ResultsStage IV SCLC cases from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) diagnosed between 2004 and 2014 were obtained. The follow-up endpoint is defined as death or the date of the last contact. Patients were divided into two groups by white and black. Features including demographic, socioeconomic, clinical, treatments and survival outcomes in Blacks and Whites were collected. Mortality hazard ratios of Blacks and Whites stage IV SCLC patients were analyzed. Survival of stage IV SCLC Black and White patients was also analyzed. Adjusted hazard ratios were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards regression models. Patients’ median follow-up time was 8.18 (2.37-15.84) months. Overall survival at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months were 52.4%, 25.7%, 13.2% and 7.9% in Blacks in compared to 51.0%, 23.6%, 11.5% and 6.9% in Whites. White patients had significantly higher socioeconomic status than Black patients. By contrast, Blacks were found associated with younger age at diagnosis, a significantly higher chance of receiving radiation therapy and treatments at an academic/research program. Compared to Whites, Blacks had a 9% decreased risk of death.ConclusionOur study demonstrated that Blacks have significant socioeconomic disadvantages compared to Whites. However, despite these unfavorable factors, survival for Blacks was significantly improved compared to Whites after covariable adjustment. This may be due to Blacks with Stage IV SCLC having a higher chance of receiving radiation therapy and treatments at an academic/research program. Identifying and removing the barriers to obtaining treatments at academic/research programs or improving the management in non-academic centers could improve the overall survival of stage IV SCLC.

266 Tumour mutation burden (TMB) and efficacy outcomes in the phase III DANUBE study of advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC)

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A292-A292
Author(s):  
Sophie Wildsmith ◽  
Jill Walker ◽  
Anne L’Hernault ◽  
Weimin Li ◽  
Hannah Bye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Unresectable Stage ◽  
First Line Treatment

BackgroundThe phase III DANUBE study assessed the efficacy of the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab (D), alone or in combination with the CTLA-4 inhibitor tremelimumab (T), versus standard of care chemotherapy (SoC) for the first-line treatment of unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic UC. The study did not meet its co-primary endpoints of improving overall survival (OS) for D monotherapy vs SoC in patients with high tumor PD-L1 expression or for D+T vs SoC in the intention-to-treat population.1 TMB measurement in blood (bTMB) or tumour (tTMB) has been linked to improved efficacy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in UC and with D+T in non-small cell lung cancer,2 thus providing a rationale to explore TMB in the DANUBE trial.MethodsBaseline plasma samples from DANUBE were assessed for bTMB using the Guardant OMNI platform, while baseline tTMB was measured in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumour samples using the FoundationOne CDx gene panel. Associations between progression-free survival (PFS) and median and landmark OS with bTMB and tTMB levels at various cutoffs were assessed as part of a pre-specified exploratory analysis. The data cutoff occurred on January 27, 2020.ResultsAmong 1032 patients randomised in DANUBE, 536 (51.9%) were evaluable for bTMB and 623 (60.4%) were evaluable for tTMB. For D vs SoC, bTMB and tTMB were not associated with OS or PFS at any cutoff. For D+T, stronger associations between bTMB and OS as well as PFS were observed with increasing bTMB cutoffs (table 1). At the bTMB cutoff ≥ 24 mut/Mb, 12-month OS rates were 76.7% for D+T and 54.3% for SoC, whereas for bTMB < 24 mut/Mb, 12-month OS rates were 53.4% for D+T and 51.2% for SoC. Similar trends for both OS and PFS were observed with tTMB (table 1).Abstract 266 Table 1Association between TMB and survival outcomes with D+TAssociation between TMB and survival outcomes with D+TConclusionsBoth bTMB and tTMB are potentially useful biomarkers for enriching responses to D+T in previously untreated, advanced UC. Neither bTMB nor tTMB was associated with better outcomes for D monotherapy. Cutoffs of 24 mut/Mb for bTMB and 10 mut/Mb for tTMB appear optimal for D+T in the setting of previously untreated, advanced UC.Trial RegistrationThe trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02516241, and the EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT number 2015-001633-24.ReferencesAstraZeneca. Update on phase III DANUBE trial for IMFINZI and tremelimumab in unresectable, stage IV bladder cancer [press release] March 6, 2020. [https://www.astrazeneca.com/media-centre/press-releases/2020/update-on-phase-iii-danube-trial-for-imfinzi-and-tremelimumab-in-unresectable-stage-iv-bladder-cancer-06032020.html]Rizvi NA, Cho BC, Reinmuth N, et al. Durvalumab with or without tremelimumab vs standard chemotherapy in first-line treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: The MYSTIC phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020:6:661–674.Ethics ApprovalThe study protocol was approved by the Ethics Board at each investigator’s institution.

scholarly journals Bilateral Choroidal Metastasis from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tariq Namad ◽  
Jiang Wang ◽  
Annemarie Tilton ◽  
Nagla Abdel Karim
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Brain Mri ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Choroidal Metastasis

Breast and lung cancers are the most common primary neoplasms to manifest with choroidal metastases. The incidence of choroidal metastases from metastatic lung cancer was reported to be 2–6.7%. We report a case of bilateral choroidal metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer. A 59-year-old Caucasian female patient, never a smoker, was diagnosed with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma metastatic to the pleura, bones, and the brain. Her initial scan of the chest showed innumerable soft tissue nodules and mediastinal adenopathy compatible with metastatic disease. Her initial brain MRI showed numerous small enhancing lesions consistent with extensive disease. Unfortunately, during her follow-up visits, she presented with bulge on her left eye. Simultaneously, her follow-up chest scan showed increase in the size of the lung nodules. She continued to have a reasonable performance status at that time, except for mild increase in her dyspnea. The choroidal metastases require a multidisciplinary care and should be among the differential patients with malignancy who present with ocular symptoms.

A comparative analysis of mortality between black and white stage III non–small cell lung cancer patients in the United States.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8552-8552
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Blessing Elimimian ◽  
Rafael Arteta-Bulos ◽  
Hong Liang ◽  
Nadeem Bilani ◽  
Leah Elson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
The United States ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Black And White ◽  
Black Patients ◽  
Stage Iii Nsclc ◽  
White Patients

8552 Background: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death in the United States (U.S.). For stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), concurrent chemotherapy (CT) plus radiotherapy (RT) within 30 days (CCRT) confers a survival benefit. The proportion of Black and White NSCLC patients not receiving CCRT and their outcomes have not been explored. Methods: Stage III NSCLC in Black and White patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 from the U.S. NCDB were included. Those with multiple tumors and who received surgery were excluded. Six groups were analyzed: CCRT (0-30 days between CT and RT), SCRT (31-120 days between CT and RT), RT (only RT), CT (only CT), No-RT-nor-CT (didn’t receive RT nor CT), and other (uncategorized). Univariate, multivariate, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were utilized (p<0.05). Results: A total of 22,459 Black (CCRT 42.3%, SCRT 7.6%, RT 13.8%, CT 15.1%, and No-RT-nor-CT 21.2%) and 138,477 White (CCRT 43.9%, SCRT 7.0%, RT 12.7%, CT 14.9%, and No-RT-nor-CT 21.5%) stage III NSCLCs were analyzed. Male gender and White race were positive predictive factors for receiving CCRT (Table). In Black patients SCRT (HR 1.1; 95% CI 1.04-1.17), RT only (HR 1.2; 95% CI 1.81-1.99), CT only (HR 1.4; 95% CI 1.36-1.49), and No RT or CT (HR 2.6; 95% CI 2.49-2.69) was associated with decreased overall survival (OS) compared to CCRT. In White patients, SCRT (HR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.99-1.03) did not decrease OS compared to CCRT, whereas RT only (HR 1.8; 95% CI, 1.74-1.80), CT only (HR 1.3; 95% CI, 1.29-1.34), and No RT or CT (HR 2.6; 95% CI, 2.59-2.67) were associated with decreased OS. Median OS with CCRT was 18 months for Black patients, versus 16 months for White patients (p<0.0001). Conclusions: OS was highest when CCRT was given. A lower proportion of Black cases were managed with CCRT, but Black patients benefit more from CCRT and had improved OS than White patients. Despite the known benefits of CT and RT in stage III NSCLC, the second largest management cohort received neither RT nor CT.[Table: see text]

The impact of race and insurance status on survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18064-e18064
Author(s):  
Vinay Nikhil Minocha ◽  
Carmen Smotherman ◽  
Jason Desmond Hew ◽  
Dat C. Pham
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Hazard Rates ◽  
Insurance Status ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Black Patients ◽  
White Patients

e18064 Background: Previous studies have demonstrated disparities in survival outcomes between black and white patients with lung cancer. Black patients are more likely than white patients to have no health insurance or insufficient coverage which may limit their access to treatment. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of race and insurance status of patients with non-small cell lung cancer on survival outcomes at our institution. Methods: Our study included patients diagnosed and treated for non-small cell lung cancer from 2005 through 2015 at University of Florida hospital in Jacksonville. Cox proportional hazard models were used to study the effect of race (black vs white), insurance, age, tobacco use, family history of cancer and stage on hazard rates for mortality. Time to treatment was compared between blacks and whites using the non-parametric Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results: Of the 1301 patients in our study, 445 (34%) were black. More black patients had Medicaid (24% vs 18%, p = 0.01), and were diagnosed at stage III or IV (81% vs 75%, p = 0.01) compared to white patients. Black patients had higher death rates compared to white patients (80% vs. 71%, p < .0004). Adjusting for stage and insurance, black patients had higher hazard rates for mortality than white patients (HR = 1.18, 95%CI 1.03, 1.35, p = 0.02). Patients with Medicaid and Medicare without supplement had higher hazard rates for mortality compared to other insurance categories (Table). There was no significant difference in time to treatment amongst patients of different races (p = 0.38) and insurance types (p = 0.54). Conclusions: Our study reveals worse survival outcomes in black patients compared to white patients with non-small cell lung cancer, controlling for insurance status and stage at presentation. Future research is needed to determine whether other factors may explain these racial disparities. [Table: see text]

Trends in immunotherapy use and survival impact in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20715-e20715
Author(s):  
Zachary Otaibi ◽  
Amir Kamran ◽  
Rodney E Wegner ◽  
Athanasios Colonias ◽  
Benny Weksler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Comorbidity Score ◽  
Nsclc Patients

e20715 Background: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States and worldwide. 5-year survival rate for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is estimated at 4%. For patients who lack a driver mutation, platinum based chemotherapy had been the cornerstone treatment, but the addition of immunotherapy has altered the treatment landscape for many advanced NSCLC patients. Immunotherapy, with or without chemotherapy, has been demonstrated in many clinical trials to extend survival in both the first-line setting as well as subsequent lines of therapy. While the clinical trial data over the past several years has been robust, less is known about how these agents have fared in routine clinical practice. To understand this better, we utilized the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) to examine the survival of patients who received immunotherapy for stage IV NSCLC. Methods: We queried the NCDB from 2004-2015 for patients with stage IV NSCLC treated with chemotherapy and at least 3 months of follow-up. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine predictors of immunotherapy use. Multivariable cox regression was used to determine predictors of overall survival. A propensity score was calculated and used to mitigate indication bias. Results: Of 203,069 eligible patients, 5,877 received immunotherapy. The median age was 65 years (40-90). The median follow up was 10.6 months (3-154). Patients were more likely to receive immunotherapy if they were younger, had a lower comorbidity score, received treatment at an academic facility, had adenocarcinoma histology, private insurance, Caucasian race, and a more recent treatment year. The use of immunotherapy rose steadily across the dataset years, rising from 1% to 12%. Predictors of survival were younger age, lower comorbidity score, lower grade tumor, treatment at an academic facility, higher education, higher income, private insurance, metropolitan location, immunotherapy use, adenocarcinoma histology, and more recent year of treatment. On propensity-matched Kaplan-Meier analysis patients treated with immunotherapy in addition to chemotherapy had improved survival, 13.7 months compared to 11.8 months, p < 0.0001. Conclusions: This analysis demonstrates improved overall survival in stage IV NSCLC patients who received immunotherapy. There are inherent limitations of retrospective analyses of data from large databases, however the survival improvement noted in this study is concordant with the more robust prospective clinical research published to date.

scholarly journals Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma with a solitary brain metastasis and low Ki-67: a unique subtype

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 1600-1606 ◽  
Author(s):  
B C M Hermans ◽  
J L Derks ◽  
H J M Groen ◽  
J A Stigt ◽  
R J van Suylen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastasis ◽  
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Cell Lung Carcinoma ◽  
Solitary Brain Metastasis

Introduction Stage IV large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung generally presents as disseminated and aggressive disease with a Ki-67 proliferation index (PI) 40–80%. LCNEC can be subdivided in two main subtypes: the first harboring TP53/RB1 mutations (small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC)-like), the second with mutations in TP53 and STK11/KEAP1 (non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC)-like). Here we evaluated 11 LCNEC patients with only a solitary brain metastasis and evaluate phenotype, genotype and follow-up. Methods Eleven LCNEC patients with solitary brain metastases were analyzed. Clinical characteristics and survival data were retrieved from medical records. Pathological analysis included histomorphological analysis, immunohistochemistry (pRB and Ki-67 PI) and next-generation sequencing (TP53, RB1, STK11, KEAP1 and MEN1). Results All patients had N0 or N1 disease. Median overall survival (OS) was 12 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.5–18.5 months). Mean Ki-67 PI was 59% (range 15–100%). In 6/11 LCNEC Ki-67 PI was ≤40%. OS was longer for Ki-67 ≤40% compared to >40% (17 months (95% CI 11–23 months) vs 5 months (95% CI 0.7–9 months), P = 0.007). Two patients were still alive at follow-up after 86 and 103 months, both had Ki-67 ≤40%. 8/11 patients could be subclassified, and both SCLC-like (n = 6) and NSCLC-like (n = 2) subtypes were present. No MEN1 mutation was found. Conclusion Stage IV LCNEC with a solitary brain metastasis and N0/N1 disease show in the majority of cases Ki-67 PI ≤40% and prolonged survival, distinguishing them from general LCNEC. This unique subgroup can be both of the SCLC-like and NSCLC-like subtype.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document