scholarly journals Effective Doses of Nalbuphine Combined With Propofol for Painless Gastroscopy in Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuangfeng Li ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
Xiaojian Chen ◽  
Tingwan Huang ◽  
Na Li
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Effective Dose ◽  
Bispectral Index ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Limb Movement ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Examination Time ◽  
Effective Doses

Objective: This prospective study evaluated the 50% effective dose (ED50) and 95% effective dose (ED95) of nalbuphine combined with propofol during painless gastroscopy.Methods: Seventy-five patients who underwent painless gastroscopy were randomly divided into five groups (group N0, N0.05, N0.1, N0.15, and N0.2), with doses of 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, or 0.2 mg/kg nalbuphine in each group. Propofol was given to all groups as the sedative. The bispectral index (BIS) value, propofol dose, examination time, and awakening time were recorded. The number of patients with intolerance indexes (coughing, retching, swallowing, or limb movement) was recorded in each group. The ED50/ED95 of nalbuphine combined with propofol for gastroscopy were calculated.Results: Compared with those of groups N0, N0.05, or N0.1, the propofol dose and awakening time were significantly reduced in group N0.15 or N0.2 (p < 0.05). The successful rate of painless gastroscopy in group N0.15 or N0.2 significantly increased compared to that of group N0 or N0.05 (p < 0.05). When combined with propofol, nalbuphine had an ED50 and ED95 for painless gastroscopy of 0.078 mg/kg (95% CI, 0.056–0.098 mg/kg) and 0.162 mg/kg (95% CI, 0.134–0.217 mg/kg), respectively.Conclusion: The ED50/ED95 of nalbuphine combined with propofol are 0.078 and 0.162 mg/kg, respectively, for painless gastroscopy. Nalbuphine at 0.162 mg/kg combined with propofol is effective and safe for painless gastroscopy in adults.

Documenting Patients’ and Providers’ Preferences When Proposing a Randomized Controlled Trial: A Qualitative Exploration

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devesh Oberoi ◽  
Cynthia Kwok ◽  
Yong Li ◽  
Cindy Railton ◽  
Susan Horsman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Referral Letter ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Follow Up Care

Abstract Background With advances in cancer diagnosis and treatment, women with early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) are living longer, increasing the number of patients receiving post-treatment follow-up care. Best-practice survivorship models recommend transitioning ESBC patients from oncology-provider (OP) care to community-based care. While developing materials for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to test the feasibility of a nurse-led Telephone Survivorship Clinic (TSC) for a smooth transition of ESBC survivors to follow-up care, we sought to explore patients’ and OPs’ reactions to our proposed recruitment methods. Methods We used a qualitative study design with content analysis, and a two-pronged approach. We interviewed OPs, seeking feedback on ways to recruit their ESBC patients for the trial, and ESBC patients, seeking input on a questionnaire package assessing outcomes and processes in the trial. Results OPs identified facilitators and barriers and offered suggestions for study design and recruitment process improvement. Facilitators included the novelty and utility of the study and simplicity of methods; barriers included lack of coordination between treating and discharging clinicians, time constraints, language barriers, motivation, and using a paper-based referral letter. OPs suggested using a combination of electronic and paper referral letters and supporting clinicians to help with recruitment. Patient advisors reported satisfaction with the content and length of the assessment package. However, they questioned the relevance of some questions (childhood trauma) while adding questions about trust in physicians and proximity to primary-care providers. Conclusion OPs and patient advisors rated our methods for the proposed trial highly for their simplicity and relevance then suggested changes. These findings document processes that could be effective for cancer-patient recruitment in survivorship clinical trials.

scholarly journals Effects of the Proactive Interdisciplinary Self-Management (PRISMA) Program on Online Care Platform Usage in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Esther du Pon ◽  
Nanne Kleefstra ◽  
Frits Cleveringa ◽  
Ad van Dooren ◽  
Eibert R. Heerdink ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Online Platform ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Number Of Patients

Online care platforms can support patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in managing their health. However, in the use of eHealth, a low participation rate is common. The Proactive Interdisciplinary Self-Management (PRISMA) program, aimed at improving patients’ self-management skills, was expected to encourage patients to manage their disease through the use of an online platform. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to investigate whether a group education program can improve the use of an online care platform in patients with T2DM treated by primary care providers in the Netherlands. In a randomized controlled trial, patients with T2DM received either PRISMA with usual care or usual care only. During a six-month follow-up period in 2014-2015, usage (number of log-ons and time spent per session) of an online care platform (e-Vita) aimed at improving T2DM self-management was assessed. A training about the functionalities of e-Vita was offered. The sample consisted of 203 patients. No differences were found between the intervention and control groups in the number of patients who attended the platform training (interested patients) (X21=0.58; p=0.45), and the number of patients who logged on at least once (platform users) (X21=0.46; p=0.50). In addition, no differences were found between the groups in the type of users—patients who logged on twice or more (active users) or patients who logged on once (nonactive users) (X21=0.56; p=0.45). The PRISMA program did not change platform usage in patients with T2DM. In addition, only a small proportion of the patients logged on twice or more. Patients probably need other encouragements to manage their condition using an online platform.

Voice Disorders in Teacher Students—A Prospective Study and a Randomized Controlled Trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 755.e13-755.e24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann-Christine Ohlsson ◽  
Eva M. Andersson ◽  
Maria Södersten ◽  
Susanna Simberg ◽  
Silwa Claesson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Voice Disorders ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Teacher Students ◽  
A Prospective Study

A prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial of the effect of topical bupivacaine on post-operative pain in bilateral nasal surgery with bilateral nasal packs inserted

2005 ◽  
Vol 119 (4) ◽  
pp. 284-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malcolm A Buchanan ◽  
Graham R Dunn ◽  
Gillian M MacDougall
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Local Anaesthetic ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Nasal Surgery ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Control Power ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference

To ascertain whether local anaesthetic use is of clinical benefit in nasal surgery, a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial of topical bupivacaine on post-operative pain in patients packed after bilateral nasal surgery was carried out. Each patient received a bupivacaine-soaked and a saline-soaked Merocel pack, thereby acting as their own control. Power analysis ascertained the number of patients required to enter the trial to detect a statistically significant difference in pain. Fifty-seven patients completed the trial. Visual analogue scales determined the level of post-operative pain at different time points in each nostril. Less pain was demonstrated in nostrils containing bupivacaine-soaked packs compared with saline-soaked packs at two hours (p < 0.0001), four hours (p = 0.0183) and six hours (p = 0.0476) post-operatively. Although not statistically significant, less pain was noted on pack removal on the local anaesthetic sides. These results provide clinical-based evidence for the use of bupivacaine as a local anaesthetic in reducing pain following nasal surgery with packing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document