scholarly journals “Pill-in-the-Pocket” Treatment of Propafenone Unmasks ECG Brugada Pattern in an Atrial Fibrillation Patient With a Common SCN5A R1193Q Polymorphism

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linling Li ◽  
Yanfei Ruan ◽  
Nian Liu ◽  
Qianqian Zhao ◽  
Mengxia Zhang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Mittal ◽  
D Brenner ◽  
S Oliveros ◽  
A Bhatt ◽  
M Preminger ◽  
...  

Abstract Background A “pill-in-the-pocket” anticoagulation strategy, guided by ECG data from an implantable loop recorder (ILR), has been advocated as a clinical strategy. However, a fundamental requirement is the ability to reliably obtain daily ECG data from patients. Objective To determine the reliability of daily ECG data transfer from ILRs. Methods We evaluated patients implanted with an ILR in whom we sought to withhold oral anticoagulation (OAC) unless atrial fibrillation (AF) was detected. The ILR transmits data nightly to a bedside monitor. Once received, the data are sent to a central server. Over the course of a month, we tracked for each patient whether ECG data were received by the server. Results The study included 170 AF patients with an ILR where we planned to withhold OAC unless AF was documented. Daily ECG data were automatically transmitted and retrievable in only 36 (21%) patients. Two (1%) pts had not a single day of connectivity, 6 (4%) pts were connected <7 days, and 16 (9%) pts were connected <14 days. Wireless connectivity was lost for >48 hours in 89 (52%) patients (Figure). Most patients experienced multiple reasons for data transmission failure within the month. Conclusions To determine whether an ILR guided OAC strategy is feasible, reliable daily transmission of ECG data is a fundamental prerequisite. Current technology facilitated daily ECG data transfer in only 1/5 of patients. In the remaining, there was either extended loss of connectivity or no connectivity at all. A “pill-in-the-pocket” anticoagulation approach is currently difficult given existing hardware limitations. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None





Author(s):  
L. Silva Raisa ◽  
N. Guhl Emily ◽  
D. Althouse Andrew ◽  
Herbert Brandon ◽  
Sharbaugh Michael ◽  
...  


Heart Rhythm ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. e3-e16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugh Calkins ◽  
Richard E. Gliklich ◽  
Michelle B. Leavy ◽  
Jonathan P. Piccini ◽  
Jonathan C. Hsu ◽  
...  


Cardiology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 145 (10) ◽  
pp. 666-675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline Jones ◽  
Mary Stanbury ◽  
Sandra Haynes ◽  
Karina V. Bunting ◽  
Trudie Lobban ◽  
...  

Aims: To establish the extent and impact of symptoms in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), the importance of different aspects of quality of life (QoL), and how we should assess wellbeing. Methods: Focus groups of patients with symptomatic permanent AF in a trial of heart rate control; the RATE-AF trial randomised 160 patients aged ≥60 years with permanent AF and at least NYHA class II dyspnoea to either digoxin or beta-blockers. Patient and public representatives led the focus groups and performed all data acquisition and analysis, using thematic approaches to interpret patient views about QoL and its measurement. Results: Substantial impairment of health-related QoL was noted in 160 trial patients, with impact on all domains apart from mental health. Eight women and 11 men aged 61–87 years participated in the focus groups. Common themes were a lack of information from healthcare professionals about AF, a lack of focus on QoL in consultations, and a sense of frustration, isolation, and reduced confidence. There was marked variability in symptoms in individual patients, with some describing severe impact on activities of daily living, and profound interaction with comorbidities such as arthritis. Day-to-day variation in QoL and difficulty in attributing symptom burden to AF or other comorbidities led to challenges in questionnaire completion. Consensus was reached that collecting both general and AF-specific QoL would be useful in routine practice, along with participation in peer support, which was empowering for the patients. Conclusions: The impact of comorbidities is poorly appreciated in the context of AF, with considerable variability in QoL that requires both generic and AF-specific assessment. Improvement in QoL should direct the appraisal, and reappraisal, of treatment decisions for patients with permanent AF.





CHEST Journal ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 150 (4) ◽  
pp. 100A ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve Antoine ◽  
Dhruv Lowe ◽  
Kegan Jessamy ◽  
Obiajulu Anozie ◽  
Vincent Frechette


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document