scholarly journals Neural Correlates of Simulated Driving While Performing a Secondary Task: A Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimiliano Palmiero ◽  
Laura Piccardi ◽  
Maddalena Boccia ◽  
Francesca Baralla ◽  
Pierluigi Cordellieri ◽  
...  
CNS Spectrums ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kara N. Carvalho ◽  
Godfrey D. Pearlson ◽  
Robert S. Astur ◽  
Vince D. Calhoun

ABSTRACTIntroduction:Virtual reality in the form of simulated driving is a useful tool for studying the brain. Various clinical questions can be addressed, including both the role of alcohol as a modulator of brain function and regional brain activation related to elements of driving.Objective:We reviewed a study of the neural correlates of alcohol intoxication through the use of a simulated-driving paradigm and wished to demonstrate the utility of recording continuous-driving behavior through a new study using a programmable driving simulator developed at our center.Methods:Functional magnetic resonance imaging data was collected from subjects while operating a driving simulator. Independent component analysis (ICA) was used to analyze the data. Specific brain regions modulated by alcohol, and relationships between behavior, brain function, and alcohol blood levels were examined with aggregate behavioral measures. Fifteen driving epochs taken from two subjects while also recording continuously recorded driving variables were analyzed with ICA.Results:Preliminary findings reveal that four independent components correlate with various aspects of behavior. An increase in braking while driving was found to increase activation in motor areas, while cerebellar areas showed signal increases during steering maintenance, yet signal decreases during steering changes. Additional components and significant findings are further outlined.Conclusion:In summary, continuous behavioral variables conjoined with ICA may offer new insight into the neural correlates of complex human behavior.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lirong Yan ◽  
Yuan Chen ◽  
Jiawen Zhang ◽  
Zhizhou Guan ◽  
Yibo Wu ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.E. Wester ◽  
K.B.E. Böcker ◽  
E.R. Volkerts ◽  
J.C. Verster ◽  
J.L. Kenemans

2004 ◽  
Vol 7 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 271-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis X. Graydon ◽  
Richard Young ◽  
Mark D. Benton ◽  
Richard J. Genik ◽  
Stefan Posse ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Margreet Vogelzang ◽  
Christiane M. Thiel ◽  
Stephanie Rosemann ◽  
Jochem W. Rieger ◽  
Esther Ruigendijk

Purpose Adults with mild-to-moderate age-related hearing loss typically exhibit issues with speech understanding, but their processing of syntactically complex sentences is not well understood. We test the hypothesis that listeners with hearing loss' difficulties with comprehension and processing of syntactically complex sentences are due to the processing of degraded input interfering with the successful processing of complex sentences. Method We performed a neuroimaging study with a sentence comprehension task, varying sentence complexity (through subject–object order and verb–arguments order) and cognitive demands (presence or absence of a secondary task) within subjects. Groups of older subjects with hearing loss ( n = 20) and age-matched normal-hearing controls ( n = 20) were tested. Results The comprehension data show effects of syntactic complexity and hearing ability, with normal-hearing controls outperforming listeners with hearing loss, seemingly more so on syntactically complex sentences. The secondary task did not influence off-line comprehension. The imaging data show effects of group, sentence complexity, and task, with listeners with hearing loss showing decreased activation in typical speech processing areas, such as the inferior frontal gyrus and superior temporal gyrus. No interactions between group, sentence complexity, and task were found in the neuroimaging data. Conclusions The results suggest that listeners with hearing loss process speech differently from their normal-hearing peers, possibly due to the increased demands of processing degraded auditory input. Increased cognitive demands by means of a secondary visual shape processing task influence neural sentence processing, but no evidence was found that it does so in a different way for listeners with hearing loss and normal-hearing listeners.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document