scholarly journals Determination of the optimum thickness of some moderators for fast neutrons.

2009 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 115-126
Author(s):  
Rasheed Yousif ◽  
Khalid Ismaeel
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Abrahão ◽  
◽  
H. Almazan ◽  
J. C. dos Anjos ◽  
S. Appel ◽  
...  

Abstract A θ13 oscillation analysis based on the observed antineutrino rates at the Double Chooz far and near detectors for different reactor power conditions is presented. This approach provides a so far unique simultaneous determination of θ13 and the total background rates without relying on any assumptions on the specific background contributions. The analysis comprises 865 days of data collected in both detectors with at least one reactor in operation. The oscillation results are enhanced by the use of 24.06 days (12.74 days) of reactor-off data in the far (near) detector. The analysis considers the $$ {\overline{\nu}}_e $$ ν ¯ e interactions up to a visible energy of 8.5 MeV, using the events at higher energies to build a cosmogenic background model considering fast-neutrons interactions and 9Li decays. The background-model-independent determination of the mixing angle yields sin2(2θ13) = 0.094 ± 0.017, being the best-fit total background rates fully consistent with the cosmogenic background model. A second oscillation analysis is also performed constraining the total background rates to the cosmogenic background estimates. While the central value is not significantly modified due to the consistency between the reactor-off data and the background estimates, the addition of the background model reduces the uncertainty on θ13 to 0.015. Along with the oscillation results, the normalization of the anti-neutrino rate is measured with a precision of 0.86%, reducing the 1.43% uncertainty associated to the expectation.


1982 ◽  
Vol 200 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 397-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dietmar Albert ◽  
Uta Brückner ◽  
Wolfgang Hansen ◽  
Wolfhard Vogel

1950 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 339-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. W. Allen ◽  
D. L. Livesey ◽  
D. H. Wilkinson

The absolute measurement of fast neutron flux presents several difficult problems. Few methods have yet been described in the literature, although the experimental techniques developed by several authors for the detection of fast neutrons (Baldinger, Huber and Staub(7), Barshall and Kanner(9), Amaldi, Bocciarelli, Ferretti and Trabacchi (3), Gray (19), Barshall and Battat(8)) may easily be adapted to this type of measurement. It is, however, most important to have available methods of measuring fast neutron flux to permit the determination of cross-sections for nuclear processes induced by fast neutrons, and several such methods have been developed in the Cavendish Laboratory in recent years. They are the subjects of separate papers (Bretscher and French (13), Kinsey, Cohen and Dainty (21), Allen (l), Allen and Wilkinson (2)). The main purpose of the present paper is to describe the results of experiments carried out to compare these methods in order to test the validity of the assumptions implicit in the individual methods.


1970 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 223-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. Corey ◽  
A. R. Boulogne ◽  
J. H. Horton

1969 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 437-438
Author(s):  
V. T. Tustanovskii ◽  
U. Orifkhodzhaev
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (1 Part A) ◽  
pp. 303-311
Author(s):  
Altan Dombayci ◽  
Eylem Ulu ◽  
Sengul Guven ◽  
Oner Atalay ◽  
Harun Ozturk

The aim of this study is to determine the optimum heat insulation thickness for the glasswool and rockwool insulation material. Since natural gas is mostly used for heating in Turkey, it has been selected as fuel for the calculation. In order to calculate the optimum thickness of the insulation, the number of the degree-day and total environmental factor have been used. For the optimum insulation thickness, the decrease in exergy loss, CO2 emission and the fuel consumption were 75%, 73%, and 71% for the glasswool, respectively. On the other hand, for the rockwool, they were 35%, 18%, and 43%, respectively. Optimum thickness was calculated as 0.40 m for glasswool, and 0.18 for the rockwool.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document