scholarly journals Impact of Feeding Syngenta Enogen® Feed Corn Compared to Control Corn in Different Diet Scenarios to Finishing Beef Cattle

Animals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 2940
Author(s):  
Stacia Volk ◽  
Hannah Wilson ◽  
Kathryn Hanford ◽  
James MacDonald ◽  
Galen Erickson

The objective of this pooled statistical analysis was to evaluate Syngenta Enogen® Feed Corn (EFC) versus conventional corn (CON) when fed as either dry-rolled corn (DRC) or high-moisture corn (HMC) for effects on finishing beef cattle performance and carcass characteristics. Corns were evaluated in diets with byproduct inclusion rates of 0, 15, 18, 20, and 30% distiller grains or 25 and 35% Sweet Bran® (a commercial corn gluten feed product). Seven trials (n = 1856) consisting of 200 pen means comparing 26 diet treatments were analyzed using regression in a pooled analysis. When EFC was processed as DRC, the gain efficiency (G:F) improved compared with CON, but the response to feeding EFC decreased from a 4.8% improvement to no improvement compared to CON as distiller grains increased from 0% to 30%, but was significantly improved due to feeding EFC in diets with 0 to 18% distiller grains. Feeding cattle EFC as DRC increased the average daily gain (ADG) and G:F by 4.5% compared with CON corn in diets containing Sweet Bran®. No improvements in animal performance were observed when cattle were fed EFC compared to CON when processed as HMC in any situation. Feeding Enogen® corn improved the gain efficiency of finishing cattle compared with conventional corn when processed as dry-rolled corn and fed in diets with less than 20% distillers or diets that include Sweet Bran®.

Author(s):  
J.J. Sindt ◽  
Sean P. Montgomery ◽  
T.B. Farran ◽  
H.J. LaBrune ◽  
R.D. Hunter ◽  
...  

1987 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.T. Fleck ◽  
K.S. Lusby ◽  
F.T. McCollum ◽  
Bryan Baker ◽  
Connell Jean Brown

2011 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 682-689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliano Roman ◽  
Clóves Cabreira Jobim ◽  
Flávio Dutra de Resende ◽  
Gustavo Rezende Siqueira ◽  
Marcelo Henrique de Faria ◽  
...  

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the performance of beef cattle in feedlots fed diets containing either whole-crop maize silage or sugarcane silage, and with different formulations. Five diets were evaluated: MSF - diet containing whole-crop maize silage, with fixed formulation during feedlot period; MSV- diet containing whole-crop maize silage, with variable formulation according to feedlot phase; SCSF - diet containing sugarcane silage with fixed formulation; SCSV- diet containing sugarcane silage, with variable formulation; SCSV/MSV- SCSV diet in initial half of fedlot and MSV diet in final half of feedlot period, respectively. It was used a complete random experimental design, with five treatments and three replicates (pens). It was used 285 steers at 36 months of age, with an initial body weight of 362.4 kg. Diets with whole-crop maize silage promoted greater intake of dry matter (10.5 kg and 2.4% BW) compared with diets containing sugarcane silage (10.1 kg and 2.3% BW). There was no effect of the silages on average daily gain (1.348 kg/animal/day) and live weight at slaughter (481.2 kg BW). SCSV/MSV diet promoted the worst feed conversion (8.0 kg DM/kg BW). Animals fed diets composed of whole-crop maize silage presented greater weight of hot carcass, of carcass yield and subcutaneous fat thickness (262.1 kg, 54.1% and 6.2 mm) compared with the animals fed sugarcane silage (252.5 kg, 52.7% and 4.8 mm). The use of sugarcane silage in diets for finishing beef cattle is feasible and the adjustment of formulation during confinement period does not influence performance of the animals. Replacement of sugarcane silage by whole-crop maize silage during the feeding period affects negatively feed conversion.


EDIS ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 2008 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bob Myer ◽  
Matt Hersom

AN-201, a 4-page fact sheet by Bob Myer and Matt Hersom, provides beef cattle producers with basic information about this co-product of wet-corn milling industry that is readily available in the southeastern USA — utilization, considerations for use, and feeding guidelines. Includes references and a table of typical nutrient composition of corn gluten feed (CGF). Published by the UF Department of Animal Science, April 2008. AN201/AN201: Corn Gluten Feed for Beef Cattle (ufl.edu)


2003 ◽  
Vol 81 (12) ◽  
pp. 3121-3129 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. Sindt ◽  
J. S. Drouillard ◽  
E. C. Titgemeyer ◽  
S. P. Montgomery ◽  
C. M. Coetzer ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sean P. Montgomery ◽  
J.J. Sindt ◽  
T.B. Farran ◽  
N.J. Pike ◽  
C.M. Coetzer ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Menghe H. Li ◽  
Edwin H. Robinson ◽  
Brian G. Bosworth ◽  
Daniel F. Oberle ◽  
Penelope M. Lucas

1988 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. 1204-1210 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.L. Gunderson ◽  
A.A. Aguilar ◽  
D.E. Johnson ◽  
J.D. Olson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document