scholarly journals Active Control of Sound Transmission through Orthogonally Rib Stiffened Double-Panel Structure: Mechanism Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (16) ◽  
pp. 3286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiyue Ma ◽  
Kean Chen ◽  
Jian Xu
Keyword(s):  
Active Control ◽  
Cavity Mode ◽  
Control Mechanism ◽  
Sound Radiation ◽  
Sound Transmission ◽  
Base Plate ◽  
Mechanism Analysis ◽  
Coupling Effects ◽  
Physical Mechanisms ◽  
Cavity Modes

Physical mechanisms of active control of sound transmission through orthogonally two ribs stiffened double-panel structure are investigated. This is the continued work of the single rib stiffened case. For the orthogonally two ribs stiffened case, four different cluster mode groups can be coupled with each other, due to the interlaced coupling effects of the horizontal and vertical ribs. One cavity mode can couple with and transmit sound energy to any type of base plate mode of the radiating ribbed plate. Consequently, the main differences of the control mechanism, when compared with the single ribbed case, lie in two aspects. One is that a novel mechanism appears. That is, suppressing and rearranging the cavity modes simultaneously achieves the suppression of the base plate modes. The other is that rearrangement of the cavity modes to rearrange the base plate modes for achieving sound radiation cancellation almost does not appear. The reason is that all types of cavity mode can couple with any one of the base plate modes due to the coupling effects of the two ribs. There is only a need to rearrange several important cavity modes to achieve suppressing the base plate mode of the radiating ribbed plate.

Structural Control Considering Time Delay Effect

1985 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 224-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Abdel-Rohman
Keyword(s):  
Time Delay ◽  
Active Control ◽  
Theoretical Consideration ◽  
Structural Control ◽  
Control Mechanism ◽  
Structural Response ◽  
Delay Effect ◽  
Numerical Example ◽  
Control Forces ◽  
Time Delay Effect

The time delay between measuring the structural response, and applying the designed active control forces may affect the controlled response of the structure if not taken into consideration. In this paper it is shown how to design the control forces to compensate for the delay effect. It is also shown that the time delay effect can be used as a criterion to judge the effectiveness of the proposed control mechanism. As an illustration of the theoretical consideration, a numerical example in which a tall building is controlled by means of active tendons is presented.

Directional sound processing and interaural sound transmission in a small and a large grasshopper

1995 ◽  
Vol 198 (9) ◽  
pp. 1817-1827 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Michelsen ◽  
K Rohrseitz
Keyword(s):  
Outer Surface ◽  
Sound Pressure ◽  
Schistocerca Gregaria ◽  
Sound Transmission ◽  
Directional Hearing ◽  
Sound Processing ◽  
Low Frequencies ◽  
High Frequencies ◽  
Physical Mechanisms ◽  
Chorthippus Biguttulus

Physical mechanisms involved in directional hearing are investigated in two species of short-horned grasshoppers that differ in body length by a factor of 3­4. The directional cues (the effects of the direction of sound incidence on the amplitude and phase angle of the sounds at the ears) are more pronounced in the larger animal, but the scaling is not simple. At high frequencies (10­20 kHz), the sound pressures at the ears of the larger species (Schistocerca gregaria) differ sufficiently to provide a useful directionality. In contrast, at low frequencies (3­5 kHz), the ears must be acoustically coupled and work as pressure difference receivers. At 3­5 kHz, the interaural sound transmission is approximately 0.5 (that is, when a tympanum is driven by a sound pressure of unit amplitude at its outer surface, the tympanum of the opposite ear receives a sound pressure with an amplitude of 0.5 through the interaural pathway). The interaural transmission decreases with frequency, and above 10 kHz it is only 0.1­0.2. It still has a significant effect on the directionality, however, because the directional cues are large. In the smaller species (Chorthippus biguttulus), the interaural sound transmission is also around 0.5 at 5 kHz, but the directionality is poor. The reason for this is not the modest directional cues, but rather the fact that the transmitted sound is not sufficiently delayed for the ear to exploit the directional cues. Above 7 kHz, the transmission increases to approximately 0.8 and the transmission delay increases; this allows the ear to become more directional, despite the still modest directional cues.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document