scholarly journals Simplified Seismic Assessment of Unreinforced Masonry Residential Buildings in the Balkans: The Case of Serbia

Buildings ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 392
Author(s):  
Predrag Blagojević ◽  
Svetlana Brzev ◽  
Radovan Cvetković
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Design ◽  
Residential Buildings ◽  
Unreinforced Masonry ◽  
Seismic Assessment ◽  
Eurocode 8 ◽  
Masonry Buildings ◽  
Seismic Evaluation ◽  
Wall Area ◽  
The Balkans ◽  
Minimum Requirements

The paper presents a study on the existing low-rise unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings constructed in the period from 1945 to 1980 in Serbia and neighbouring countries in the Balkans. Buildings of this typology experienced damage in a few earthquakes in the region, including the 2010 Kraljevo, Serbia earthquake and the 2020 Petrinja, Croatia earthquake. The focus of the study is a seismic design approach for Simple masonry buildings according to Eurocode 8, Part 1, which is based on the minimum requirements for the total wall area relative to the floor plan area, which is referred to as Wall Index (WI) in this paper. Although the intention of Eurocode 8 is to use WI for design of new buildings, the authors believe that it could be also used for seismic assessment of existing masonry buildings in pre- and post-earthquake situations. A study on 23 URM buildings damaged in the 2010 Kraljevo, Serbia earthquake has been presented to examine a relationship between the WI and the extent of earthquake damage. Seismic evaluation of a typical 3-storey URM building damaged in the 2010 earthquake was performed according to the requirements of seismic design codes from the former Yugoslavia and Eurocode 8.

Testing of Masonry Structures for Seismic Assessment

1996 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Michele Calvi ◽  
Gregory R. Kingsley ◽  
Guido Magenes
Keyword(s):  
Energy Dissipation ◽  
Experimental Evaluation ◽  
Unreinforced Masonry ◽  
Seismic Assessment ◽  
Experimental Techniques ◽  
Masonry Buildings ◽  
Masonry Structures ◽  
Seismic Loadings ◽  
Energy Dissipation Capacity ◽  
Reduced Scale

The experimental evaluation of strength, deformability, and energy dissipation capacity of unreinforced masonry buildings subjected to seismic loadings presents unique and complex problems, both for laboratory and field evaluations. The paper addresses these problems, focusing on the relative merits and roles of several experimental techniques, including quasistatic, dynamic, and pseudodynamic loadings at full and reduced scale.

Seismic assessment and improvement of unreinforced stone masonry buildings

2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 148-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Giaretton ◽  
Dmytro Dizhur ◽  
Francesca Da Porto ◽  
Jason M. Ingham
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Seismic Vulnerability ◽  
Unreinforced Masonry ◽  
Seismic Assessment ◽  
Stone Masonry ◽  
Minor Amount ◽  
Assessment Procedure ◽  
Masonry Buildings ◽  
Building Stock ◽  
A Minor

Following the 2010/2011 Canterbury earthquakes considerable effort was applied to the task of developing industry guidance for the seismic assessment, repair and strengthening of unreinforced masonry buildings. The recently updated “Section 10” of NZSEE 2006 is one of the primary outputs from these efforts, in which a minor amount of information is introduced regarding vintage stone unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings. Further information is presented herein to extend the resources readily available to New Zealand practitioners regarding load-bearing stone URM buildings via a literature review of the traditional European approach to this topic and its applicability to the New Zealand stone URM building stock. An informative background to typical stone URM construction is presented, including population, geometric, structural and material characteristics. The European seismic vulnerability assessment procedure is then reported, explaining each step in sequence of assessment by means of preliminary inspection (photographic, geometric, structural and crack pattern surveys) and investigation techniques, concluding with details of seismic improvement interventions. The challenge in selecting the appropriate intervention for each existing URM structure is associated with reconciling the differences between heritage conservation and engineering perspectives to reinstating the original structural strength. Traditional and modern techniques are discussed herein with the goal of preserving heritage values and ensuring occupant safety. A collection of Annexes are provided that summarise the presented information in terms of on-site testing, failure mechanisms and seismic improvement.

Simple Seismic Assessment of Traditional Unreinforced Masonry Buildings

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1055-1077 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. V. Karantoni ◽  
M. L. Papadopoulos ◽  
S. J. Pantazopoulou
Keyword(s):  
Unreinforced Masonry ◽  
Seismic Assessment ◽  
Masonry Buildings

Benchmarking the seismic assessment of unreinforced masonry buildings from a blind prediction test

Structures ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 982-1005
Author(s):  
F. Parisse ◽  
S. Cattari ◽  
R. Marques ◽  
P.B. Lourenço ◽  
G. Magenes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Unreinforced Masonry ◽  
Seismic Assessment ◽  
Masonry Buildings ◽  
Blind Prediction ◽  
Prediction Test

scholarly journals Seismic Design of Box-Type Unreinforced Masonry Buildings Through Direct Displacement-Based Approach

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 293-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fulvio Parisi
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Design ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Unreinforced Masonry ◽  
Masonry Building ◽  
Masonry Buildings ◽  
Construction Costs ◽  
Plane Failure ◽  
Accidental Eccentricity ◽  
Reinforced Concrete Slabs ◽  
Displacement Based

In the last decade, displacement-based seismic design procedures have been recognised to be effective alternatives to force-based design (FBD) methods. Indeed, displacement based design (DBD) may allow the structural engineer to get more realistic predictions of local and global deformations of the structure, and hence damage, under design earthquakes. This facilitates the achievement of performance objectives and loss mitigation in the lifetime of the structure. Nonetheless, DBD needs further investigation for some structural types such as masonry buildings. In this paper, a direct displacement based design (DDBD) procedure for unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings is presented and critically compared to FBD. The procedure is proposed for box-type URM buildings with reinforced concrete slabs, bond beams and lintels above openings, which have shown acceptable seismic performance in severe earthquakes preventing out-of-plane failure modes. Seismic design of a three storey brick masonry building in a high seismicity region is discussed as a case study. The effects of ordinary and near-field design earthquakes, as well as load combinations and accidental eccentricity prescribed by current codes, were investigated. Finally, design solutions provided by FBD and DDBD were optimised and their construction costs were estimated. It was found that, particularly at small epicentral distances, neglecting the combination of horizontal seismic actions and accidental eccentricity may induce significant underestimation and an ideally more uniform distribution of strength demands on URM walls. In addition, construction costs resulting from DDBD may be significantly lower than those related to code based FBD procedures.

Natural Period and Seismic Idealization of Flexible Timber Diaphragms

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 1003-1019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Wilson ◽  
Pierre Quenneville ◽  
Jason Ingham
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Model ◽  
Unreinforced Masonry ◽  
Seismic Assessment ◽  
Fundamental Period ◽  
Masonry Buildings ◽  
Natural Period ◽  
Shear Beam ◽  
Deformation Mechanics ◽  
Assessment Procedures

The current equations for diaphragm fundamental period determination and for diaphragm deformation determination published in commonly used seismic assessment documents are firstly reviewed to establish their origin. Using a validated analytical model that captures diaphragm deformation mechanics, three beam idealizations (a fixed-ended flexure beam, a pin-ended flexure beam, and a shear beam) are compared against true diaphragm behavior to determine which idealization is most suitable for the seismic assessment of diaphragm performance. Wherever necessary, recommendations have been made to update and to harmonize the current seismic assessment procedures for timber diaphragms in unreinforced masonry buildings. The presented analysis is specifically focused on straight-sheathed timber diaphragm configurations that are typically found in historic unreinforced masonry buildings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document