scholarly journals A Retrospective Comparative Study of Sodium Fluoride (NaF-18)-PET/CT and Fluorocholine (F-18-CH) PET/CT in the Evaluation of Skeletal Metastases in Metastatic Prostate Cancer Using a Volumetric 3-D Radiomics Analysis

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Kalevi Kairemo ◽  
S. Cheenu Kappadath ◽  
Timo Joensuu ◽  
Homer A. Macapinlac

Bone metastases are common in prostate cancer (PCa). Fluorocholine-18 (FCH) and sodium fluoride-18 (NaF) have been used to assess PCa associated skeletal disease in thousands of patients by demonstrating different mechanism of uptake-cell membrane (lipid) synthesis and bone mineralization. Here, this difference is characterized quantitatively in detail. Our study cohort consisted of 12 patients with advanced disease (> 5 lesions) (M) and of five PCa patients with no skeletal disease (N). They had routine PET/CT with FCH and NaF on consecutive days. Skeletal regions in CT were used to co-register the two PET/CT scans. Bone 3-D volume of interest (VOI) was defined on the CT of PET with a threshold of HU > 150, and sclerotic/dense bone as HU > 600, respectively. Additional VOIs were defined on PET uptake with the threshold values on both FCH (SUV > 3.5) and NaF (SUV > 10). The pathologic skeletal volumes for each technique (CT, HU > 600), NaF (SUV > 10) and FCH (SUV > 3.5) were developed and analyzed. The skeletal VOIs varied from 5.03 L to 7.31 L, whereas sclerotic bone VOIs were from 0.88 L to 2.99 L. Total choline kinase (cell membrane synthesis) activity for FCH (TCA) varied from 0.008 to 4.85 [kg] in M group and from 0.0006 to 0.085 [kg] in N group. Total accelerated osteoblastic (bone demineralization) activity for NaF (TBA varied from 0.25 to 13.6 [kg] in M group and varied from 0.000 to 1.09 [kg] in N group. The sclerotic bone volume represented only 1.86 ± 1.71% of the pathologic FCH volume and 4.07 ± 3.21% of the pathologic NaF volume in M group, and only 0.08 ± 0.09% and 0.18 ± 0.19% in N group, respectively. Our results suggest that CT alone cannot be used for the assessment of the extent of active metastatic skeletal disease in PCa. NaF and FCH give complementary information about the activity of the skeletal disease, improving diagnosis and disease staging.

2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 1046-1048 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuxin Li ◽  
Bashir A. Tafti ◽  
Wisam Shaba ◽  
Gholam R. Berenji

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10589-10589
Author(s):  
Joseph W. Kim ◽  
Maria Liza Lindenberg ◽  
William L. Dahut ◽  
James L. Gulley ◽  
Ravi A. Madan ◽  
...  

10589 Background: We evaluated the clinical utility of 18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT bone scan (18F-NaF) in the detection of bone metastases in patients (pts) with prostate cancer in comparison with Technetium-99m MDP bone scan (TcBS). Methods: In a prospective study, from October 2010-December 2011, 30 prostate cancer pts (ages 51-79), 21 with known bone metastases and 9 without known bone metastases, had18F-NaF and a TcBS performed. Abnormal foci of uptake on both TcBS and 18F-NaFwere classified as benign, malignant or indeterminate. Benign lesions included uptake in the joints and linear uptake at the endplates of the vertebral bodies consistent with degenerative changes. Malignant uptake on 18F-NaF scans was confirmed by characteristic osteoblastic features on CT. All TcBS and 18F-NaF were reviewed by an experienced nuclear medicine physician. For the patient-based analysis, scan results were categorized as positive (POS) = any malignant lesion; indeterminate (IND) = not distinctly malignant or benign; negative (NEG) = benign lesions only. Results: In the lesion-based analysis, 21 of 30 (70%) pts had more malignant lesions identified on 18F-NaF than on TcBS. The mean number of additional malignant lesions per patient on 18F-NaF vs TcBS was 4. Eight of the 30 pts had same number of malignant lesions identified in both studies. One of 30 pts had one less malignant lesion identified on 18F-NaF than on TcBS. CT correlation by 18F-NaF PET/CT of this particular lesion did not confirm osteoblastic feature. Malignant lesion distribution on 18F-NaF included: spine (28%), thorax (26%), pelvis (24%), long bones (13%) and skull (10%). In the patient-based analysis, 24 pts (80%) were POS by 18F-NaF, of whom 14 pts were POS, 8 were IND, and 2 were NEG by corresponding TcBS; in the 4 pts with NEG 18F-NaF, zero were POS, 2 were IND and 2 were NEG by corresponding TcBS. Conclusions: 18F-NaF identified more malignant lesions than TcBS. 18F-NaF may also add useful information in the management of advanced prostate cancer pts with and without known bone metastases.


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Lindgren Belal ◽  
May Sadik ◽  
Reza Kaboteh ◽  
Nezar Hasani ◽  
Olof Enqvist ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document