A Metagovernance Model of Innovation Networks in the Health and Social Services Using a Neo-Schumpeterian Framework

Health and social services (HSS) are now, more than ever, at the center of the debate of public policy. We are interested in studying the HSS services innovations from the networked-governance strategy standpoint. With this research, we contribute by analyzing the criteria leading to the formation of HSS public service innovation networks (HSS PSINs). These criteria are important because they may result in the much-needed empirical foundation of the metagovernance of public networks for sustainable innovation. Our analysis rests on neo-Schumpeterian interpretations of product, process, organizational, market, and input innovations, and their characteristics. By an empirical partial least squares structural equations model, we present here the relationships between those characteristics and HSS PSINs. Our intent is that these relationships become clearer, and help enhance HSS PSINs metagovernance—i.e., their control, democratic legitimacy, and accountability by public decision-makers. Hence, our research supports the voices for an extended use of networks for policy and service collaborative innovation for sustainability.

Download Full-text

Ageism in the health and social services sector in Ireland

PsycEXTRA Dataset ◽

10.1037/e537022013-004 ◽

2005 ◽

Author(s):

Eileen McGlone

Keyword(s):

Social Services ◽

Services Sector ◽

Health And Social Services

Download Full-text

Leading Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Mental Health and Social Services

PsycEXTRA Dataset ◽

10.1037/e603552010-001 ◽

2010 ◽

Author(s):

Gregory A. Aarons ◽

Jonathan D. Horowitz

Keyword(s):

Mental Health ◽

Social Services ◽

Evidence Based Practice ◽

Evidence Based ◽

Health And Social Services ◽

Practice Implementation

Download Full-text

Depression in the Developing World

10.1093/oso/9780198801900.003.0017 ◽

2017 ◽

Author(s):

Harry Minas

Keyword(s):

Mental Health ◽

International Development ◽

Social Services ◽

Development Programs ◽

Middle Income ◽

Health And Social Services ◽

Middle Income Countries ◽

Culturally Informed ◽

Global Understanding

This chapter provides an overview of what is known about prevalence, social determinants, treatment, and course and impact of depression in developing, or low- and middle-income, countries. The importance of culture in depression and in the construction and application of diagnostic classifications and in health and social services is highlighted, with a particular focus on the applicability of ‘Western’ diagnostic constructs and service systems in developing country settings. The role of international organizations, such as WHO, and international development programs, such as the SDGs, in improving our understanding of depression and in developing effective and culturally appropriate responses is briefly examined. There is both a need and increasing opportunities in developing countries for greater commitment to mental health of populations, increased investment in mental health and social services, and culturally informed research that will contribute to improved global understanding of mental disorders in general and depression in particular.

Download Full-text

The Integration of Psychosocial Care into National Dementia Strategies Across Europe: Evidence from the Skills in DEmentia Care (SiDECar) Project

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ◽

10.3390/ijerph18073422 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 18 (7) ◽

pp. 3422

Author(s):

Ilaria Chirico ◽

Rabih Chattat ◽

Vladimíra Dostálová ◽

Pavla Povolná ◽

Iva Holmerová ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Content Analysis ◽

Clinical Practice ◽

Social Services ◽

Psychosocial Care ◽

Psychosocial Interventions ◽

System Of Care ◽

Dementia Care ◽

Integrated System ◽

Health And Social Services

There is evidence supporting the use of psychosocial interventions in dementia care. Due to the role of policy in clinical practice, the present study investigates whether and how the issue of psychosocial care and interventions has been addressed in the national dementia plans and strategies across Europe. A total of 26 national documents were found. They were analyzed by content analysis to identify the main pillars associated with the topic of psychosocial care and interventions. Specifically, three categories emerged: (1) Treatment, (2) Education, and (3) Research. The first one was further divided into three subcategories: (1) Person-centred conceptual framework, (2) Psychosocial interventions, and (3) Health and social services networks. Overall, the topic of psychosocial care and interventions has been addressed in all the country policies. However, the amount of information provided differs across the documents, with only the category of ‘Treatment’ covering all of them. Furthermore, on the basis of the existing policies, how the provision of psychosocial care and interventions would be enabled, and how it would be assessed are not fully apparent yet. Findings highlight the importance of policies based on a comprehensive and well-integrated system of care, where the issue of psychosocial care and interventions is fully embedded.

Download Full-text

Strategies for involving patients and the public in scaling-up initiatives in health and social services: protocol for a scoping review and Delphi survey

Systematic Reviews ◽

10.1186/s13643-021-01597-6 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Ali Ben Charif ◽

◽

Karine V. Plourde ◽

Sabrina Guay-Bélanger ◽

Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Social Services ◽

Scoping Review ◽

Delphi Study ◽

Public Involvement ◽

Scale Up ◽

Scaling Up ◽

Delphi Survey ◽

The Public ◽

Health And Social Services ◽

Scoping Reviews

Abstract Background The scale-up of evidence-based innovations is required to reduce waste and inequities in health and social services (HSS). However, it often tends to be a top-down process initiated by policy makers, and the values of the intended beneficiaries are forgotten. Involving multiple stakeholders including patients and the public in the scaling-up process is thus essential but highly complex. We propose to identify relevant strategies for meaningfully and equitably involving patients and the public in the science and practice of scaling up in HSS. Methods We will adapt our overall method from the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Following this, we will perform a two-prong study design (knowledge synthesis and Delphi study) grounded in an integrated knowledge translation approach. This approach involves extensive participation of a network of stakeholders interested in patient and public involvement (PPI) in scaling up and a multidisciplinary steering committee. We will conduct a systematic scoping review following the methodology recommended in the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers Manual. We will use the following eligibility criteria: (1) participants—any stakeholder involved in creating or testing a strategy for PPI; (2) intervention—any PPI strategy proposed for scaling-up initiatives; (3) comparator—no restriction; (4) outcomes: any process or outcome metrics related to PPI; and (5) setting—HSS. We will search electronic databases (e.g., Medline, Web of Science, Sociological Abstract) from inception onwards, hand search relevant websites, screen the reference lists of included records, and consult experts in the field. Two reviewers will independently select and extract eligible studies. We will summarize data quantitatively and qualitatively and report results using the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. We will conduct an online Delphi survey to achieve consensus on the relevant strategies for PPI in scaling-up initiatives in HSS. Participants will include stakeholders from low-, middle-, and high-income countries. We anticipate that three rounds will allow an acceptable degree of agreement on research priorities. Discussion Our findings will advance understanding of how to meaningfully and equitably involve patients and the public in scaling-up initiatives for sustainable HSS. Systematic review registration We registered this protocol with the Open Science Framework on August 19, 2020 (https://osf.io/zqpx7/).

Download Full-text