scholarly journals Pandemic-Induced Reductions on Swim Training Volume and Performance in Collegiate Swimmers

Author(s):  
Gloria Martinez Perez ◽  
Matthew VanSumeren ◽  
Michael Brown ◽  
Tamara Hew-Butler

The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant training disruptions during the 2020–2021 season, due to lockdowns, quarantines, and strict adherence to the pandemic protocols. The main purpose of this study was to determine how the pandemic training restrictions affected training volume and performance in one collegiate swim team. Cumulative training volume data across a 28-week season were compared between a pandemic (2020–2021) versus non-pandemic (2019–2020) season. The swimmers were categorized into three groups (sprinters, mid-distance, and long-distance) based on their training group. The performance times of 25 swimmers who competed in the regional championships, during both the non-pandemic and pandemic year, were compared via one-way ANOVA. Twenty-six male and 22 female swimmers commenced the 2020–2021 (pandemic) season, with 23% of the swimmers voluntarily opting out. Three COVID-19 cases were confirmed (2%) by the medical staff, with no long-term effects. Significant reductions in the average swim volume were verified in sprinters (32,867 ± 10,135 vs. 14,800 ± 7995 yards; p < 0.001), mid-distance (26,457 ± 10,692 vs. 17,054 ± 9.923 yards; p < 0.001), and long-distance (37,600 ± 14,430 vs. 22,254 ± 14,418 yards; p < 0.001) swimmers (non-pandemic vs. pandemic season, respectively). In the regional performance analyses, the sprinters swam faster (n = 8; −0.5 ± 0.6 s), while the mid-distance (n = 10; 0.17 ± 2.1 s) and long-distance (n = 7; 6.0 ± 4.9 s) swimmers swam slower (F = 11.76; p = 0.0003; r2 = 0.52). Thus, the pandemic caused significant reductions in swim training volume, with sprinters performing better and long-distance swimmers performing worse at the regional championships.

Author(s):  
Gloria Martinez Perez ◽  
Matthew VanSumeren ◽  
Michael Brown ◽  
Tamara Hew-Butler

The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant training disruptions during the 2020-21 season due to lockdowns, quarantines, and strict adherence to pandemic protocols. The main purpose of this study was to determine how pandemic training restrictions affected training volume and performance in one collegiate swim team. Cumulative training volume data, across a 28-week season, were compared between a pandemic (2020-2021) versus non-pandemic (2019-2020) season. Swimmers were categorized into three groups (Sprinters, Mid-Distance, and Long-Distance) based on training group. Performance times in 25 swimmers who competed in Regional Championships, during both the non-pandemic and pandemic year, were compared via 1-way ANOVA. 26 male and 22 female swimmers commenced the 2020-21 (pandemic) season, with 23% of swimmers voluntarily opting out. Three COVID-19 cases were confirmed (2%) by the medical staff with no long-term effects. Significant reductions in average swim volume were verified in Sprinters (32,867&plusmn;10,135 vs.14,800&plusmn;7,995yards;p&lt;0.001), Mid-Distance (26,457&plusmn;10,692 vs.17,054&plusmn;9.923yards;p&lt;0.001), and Long-Distance (37,600&plusmn;14,430 vs.22,254&plusmn;14,418yards;p&lt;0.001) swimmers (non-pandemic vs. pandemic season, respectively). In the Regional performance analyses, the Sprinters swam faster (n=8;-0.5&plusmn;0.6secs), while Mid-Distance (n=10;0.17&plusmn;2.1secs) and Long-Distance (n=7;6.0&plusmn;4.9secs) swimmers swam slower (F=11.76;p=0.0003;r2=0.52). Thus, the pandemic caused significant reductions in swim training volume, with Sprinters performing better and Long-Distance swimmers performing worse at Regional Championships.


2019 ◽  
pp. 156-191
Author(s):  
William Lazonick ◽  
Jang-Sup Shin

This chapter uses innovation theory to provide both a general theoretical critique and a selective empirical critique of the use of agency theory to rationalize the looting of the U.S. business corporation as enhancing economic efficiency. It focuses on three empirical works, Bebchuk and Fried, Pay Without Performance (2004); Bebchuk, Brav, and Jiang, “The Long-Term Effects of Hedge-Fund Activism” (2015); and Fried and Wang, “Short-Termism and Capital Flows” (2017). The chapter contends that MSV ideology as promulgated by agency theorists has contributed to inferior corporate and economic performance. It then argues that, for analyzing the operation and performance of the economy, innovation theory should replace agency theory.


2012 ◽  
Vol 49 ◽  
pp. 93-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenlong Wang ◽  
Jingqing Gao ◽  
Xiao Guo ◽  
Wenchao Li ◽  
Xinyuan Tian ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 37 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 1341-1350 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Volk ◽  
M Geissmann ◽  
A Blatter ◽  
F Contat ◽  
J Fuhrer

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Eugene Arnold ◽  
Paul Hodgkins ◽  
Jennifer Kahle ◽  
Manisha Madhoo ◽  
Geoff Kewley

Objective: The aim of this study was to synthesize published data regarding long-term effects of ADHD on information learned (measured via achievement tests) and success within the school environment (academic performance). Method: A systematic search identified 176 studies (1980-2012) of long-term (≥2 years) academic outcomes with ADHD. Results: Achievement test outcomes (79%) and academic performance outcomes (75%) were worse in individuals with untreated ADHD compared with non-ADHD controls, also when IQ difference was controlled (72% and 81%, respectively). Improvement in both outcome groups was associated with treatment, more often for achievement test scores (79%) than academic performance (42%), also when IQ was controlled (100% and 57%, respectively). More achievement test and academic performance outcomes improved with multimodal (100% and 67%, respectively) than pharmacological (75% and 33%) or non-pharmacological (75% and 50%) treatment alone. Conclusion: ADHD adversely affects long-term academic outcomes. A greater proportion of achievement test outcomes improved with treatment compared with academic performance. Both improved most consistently with multimodal treatment.


2015 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 2417-2427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zheng-Zhe Zhang ◽  
Qian-Qian Zhang ◽  
Jia-Jia Xu ◽  
Zhi-Jian Shi ◽  
Qiong Guo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document