scholarly journals Mental Load and Fatigue Assessment Instruments: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 419
Author(s):  
Jesús Díaz-García ◽  
Inmaculada González-Ponce ◽  
José Carlos Ponce-Bordón ◽  
Miguel Ángel López-Gajardo ◽  
Iván Ramírez-Bravo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Assessment Instruments ◽  
Mental Load ◽  
Fatigue Assessment

Mental load and fatigue are important causes of performance decreases and accidents in different activities. However, a robust systematic review, detailing the instruments used to quantify them, is currently lacking. The purpose of this study was to summarize and classify by derivations the validated instruments used to quantify mental load and fatigue. The most representative electronic databases in the scope of this review, PubMed, WOS, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and PsycINFO (until September 2020) were searched for studies that included instruments to analyze mental load and fatigue. The quality of the selected studies was scored using a quality assessment checklist. A total of 40 papers were included. Most of the papers used subjective scales (75%) to quantify mental load and fatigue, with a small presence of behavioral (n = 5) and objective techniques (n = 5). Less is known about the analysis of mental load and fatigue using a combination of derivations. Despite the high cost and complexity of objective techniques, research that applies these measures is important for further analysis of brain processes in mental load and fatigue. The design of a battery of tests that include the three types of derivations also seems necessary.

scholarly journals Routine administration of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and needs assessment instruments to improve psychological outcome – a systematic review

2002 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 1345-1356 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. GILBODY ◽  
A. O. HOUSE ◽  
T. SHELDON
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Assessment Instruments ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Routine Administration ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

Background. Routine administration of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and needs assessment instruments has been advocated as part of clinical care to aid the recognition of psychosocial problems, to inform clinical decision making, to monitor therapeutic response and to facilitate patient–doctor communication. However, their adoption is not without cost and the benefit of their use is unclear.Method. A systematic review was conducted. We sought experimental studies that examined the addition of routinely administered measures of HRQoL to care in both psychiatric and non-psychiatric settings. We searched the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycLIT and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (to 2000). Data were extracted independently and a narrative synthesis of results was presented.Results. Nine randomized and quasi-randomized studies conducted in non-psychiatric settings were found. All the instruments used included an assessment of mental well-being, with specific questions relating to depression and anxiety. The routine feedback of these instruments had little impact on the recognition of mental disorders or on longer term psychosocial functioning. While clinicians welcomed the information these instruments imparted, their results were rarely incorporated into routine clinical decision making. No studies were found that examined the value of routine assessment and feedback of HRQoL or patient needs in specialist psychiatric care settings.Conclusions. Routine HRQoL measurement is a costly exercise and there is no robust evidence to suggest that it is of benefit in improving psychosocial outcomes of patients managed in non-psychiatric settings. Major policy initiatives to increase the routine collection and use of outcome measures in psychiatric settings are unevaluated.

scholarly journals A systematic review of head and neck cancer quality of life assessment instruments

Oral Oncology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 48 (10) ◽  
pp. 923-937 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bukola Ojo ◽  
Eric M. Genden ◽  
Marita S. Teng ◽  
Kathrin Milbury ◽  
Krzysztof J. Misiukiewicz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Life Assessment ◽  
Assessment Instruments ◽  
Quality Of Life Assessment

scholarly journals Quality of life assessment instruments for adults: a systematic review of population-based studies

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nila Patrícia Freire Pequeno ◽  
Natália Louise de Araújo Cabral ◽  
Dirce Maria Marchioni ◽  
Severina Carla Vieira Cunha Lima ◽  
Clélia de Oliveira Lyra
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Life Assessment ◽  
Assessment Instruments ◽  
Quality Of Life Assessment

scholarly journals Quality-assessment of disease-specific quality of life questionnaires for rhinitis and rhinosinusitis: a systematic review

Allergy ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 62 (12) ◽  
pp. 1359-1371 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. M. van Oene ◽  
E. J. F. van Reij ◽  
M. A. G. Sprangers ◽  
W. J. Fokkens
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Quality Of Life Questionnaires ◽  
Disease Specific

scholarly journals The association between self-efficacy and self-care in essential hypertension: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Felicia Clara Jun Hui Tan ◽  
Prawira Oka ◽  
Hajira Dambha-Miller ◽  
Ngiap Chuan Tan
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Cognitive Theory ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Self Care ◽  
Quality Assessment Tool ◽  
Medium Quality

Abstract Background The successful management of hypertension requires sustained engagement in self-care behaviour such as adhering to medication regimens and diet. Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory suggests that self-efficacy is a major determinant of engagement in self-care behaviour. Self-efficacy refers to an individual’s belief in their capacity to execute behaviours necessary to produce specific performance attainments. This systematic review of observational studies aims to summarise and evaluate the quality of evidence available to support the association between self-efficacy and engagement in self-care behaviour in hypertension. Methods Searches were performed of the Pubmed, MEDLINE, CINAHL and OpenSIGLE databases from database inception to January 2020. Reference lists and individual journals were also hand searched. Observational studies in English quantifying self-efficacy and self-care behaviour in hypertensive adults were included. The quality of included articles was assessed with the National Institute of Health Quality Assessment Tool for observational studies. Results The literature search identified 102 studies, of which 22 met the inclusion criteria for full-text review. There were 21 studies which reported that higher self-efficacy was associated with engagement in self-care behaviours including medication adherence (n = 9), physical activity (n = 2) and dietary changes (n = 1). Of these, 12 studies were rated as ‘good’ on the quality assessment tool and 10 were ‘fair’. A common limitation in these studies was a lack of objectivity due to their reliance on self-reporting of engagement in self-care behaviour. Conclusion Our review suggests an association between self-efficacy and self-care. However, the evidence supporting this association is of low to medium quality and is limited by heterogeneity. Our findings suggest the need for further well-designed interventional studies to investigate this association.

scholarly journals Quality Assessment Criteria for Mobile Health Apps: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 745-759
Author(s):  
Wilasinee HONGSANUN ◽  
Suppachai INSUK
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Mobile Health ◽  
User Satisfaction ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Security And Privacy ◽  
Assessment Criteria ◽  
Health Apps ◽  
Mobile Health Apps

Summative evidences on the criteria for user assessment of health apps are still limited. In order to determine an assessment method for mobile health apps, rigorous and appropriate criteria must be chosen. The aim of this study is to review the existing quality assessment criteria that are being used to assess the quality of mobile health apps focusing on users’ perspectives. In addition, a procedure for the quality assessment of health apps is also presented. A systematic review was conducted utilizing 5 databases; PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, CENTRAL and IEEE Xplore from 2008 to 2017. Search terms were; “mHealth”, “Applications”, “iOS OR Android”, “smartphones”, “quality”, etc. Papers that assessed the quality of health apps by users were selected. The PRISMA guideline was followed to complete the list of final studies. Likewise, a data extraction form was based on the PICO framework. From 6,514 studies, 69 studies met the eligibility criteria. Four hundred and forty-one quality assessment criteria for users were classified into 15 domains: Ease of use, Usability, Aesthetics, Connectivity, Functionality, Information, User satisfaction, Acceptability, Error occurrence, Motivation, Engagement, Data management, Undesirable events, Credentials and Security and privacy. An “ease of use” domain was found common in the included studies. The 15 domains were suggested as criteria for further study of the quality assessment and development of mHealth apps. Moreover, five recommended steps were presented for future research of quality of mobile health apps.

scholarly journals Effects of psychological intervention on rehabilitation outcomes in patients with spinal cord injury; a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-9
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ayaz ◽  
Syeda Ayman Zaidi ◽  
Muhammad Hamza Khan ◽  
Aatik Arsh
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Spinal Cord Injury ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Physical Rehabilitation ◽  
Psychological Interventions ◽  
Rehabilitation Outcomes ◽  
Cord Injury

Introduction: Psychological issues are common in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) which negatively affects rehabilitation outcomes. Therefore, early psychological interventions are as important as physical rehabilitation. The aim of the study was to systematically review literature regarding the effects of psychological interventions on rehabilitation outcomes in patients with SCI. Material & Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Literature was searched in PubMed and PEDro databases. Articles published in English language from earliest record to August 2020 were searched. Observational and interventional studies which assessed effects of different psychological interventions on rehabilitation outcomes in patients with SCI were included. Review articles, editorials, short communications and conference papers were excluded. Quality assessment of the interventional studies was assessed using PEDro scale while methodological quality of the observational studies was carried out using NIH quality assessment tools. Results: On the basis of eligibility criteria, 13 studies were included. Out of the total studies, 11 were observational studies and the remaining 2 were interventional studies. The included studies reported that psychological interventions improve rehabilitation outcomes such as functional independence, community participation and quality of life. Conclusion: Psychological treatment is an effective complement to physical rehabilitation interventions to improve functional status of patients with SCI.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document