scholarly journals The Roles of the IGF Axis in the Regulation of the Metabolism: Interaction and Difference between Insulin Receptor Signaling and IGF-I Receptor Signaling

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (13) ◽  
pp. 6817
Author(s):  
Tomoko Okuyama ◽  
Mayu Kyohara ◽  
Yasuo Terauchi ◽  
Jun Shirakawa

It has been well established that insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) mainly mediate long-term actions in cell fates, whereas insulin predominantly exerts its role on metabolic activity. Indeed, insulin mediates multiple anabolic biological activities in glucose and amino acid transport, lipid and protein synthesis, the induction of glycogen, the inhibition of gluconeogenesis, lipolysis, and protein degradation. The interactions and differences between insulin receptor signaling and IGF-I receptor signaling in the metabolism and the cell fates are quite complicated. Because of the overlapping actions of IGF-I singling with insulin signaling, it has been difficult to distinguish the role of both signaling mechanisms on the metabolism. Furthermore, comprehensive information on the IGF-I function in respective tissues remains insufficient. Therefore, we need to clarify the precise roles of IGF-I signaling on the metabolism separate from those of insulin signaling. This review focuses on the metabolic roles of IGFs in the respective tissues, especially in terms of comparison with those of insulin, by overviewing the metabolic phenotypes of tissue-specific IGF-I and insulin receptor knockout mice, as well as those in mice treated with the dual insulin receptor/IGF-I receptor inhibitor OSI-906.

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Islam Osman ◽  
Lakshman Segar

Previous studies have shown that PDGF-induced activation of mTOR/p70S6kinase signaling is associated with dysregulation of insulin receptor substrates (IRS1 and IRS2) in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). In addition, pioglitazone (PIO, an antidiabetic drug) has been shown to inhibit mTOR/p70S6kinase signaling thereby suppressing PDGF-induced VSMC proliferation. The role of IRS1/IRS2 on proliferative signaling events has not yet been examined in VSMCs treated with fructose (an agent that induces insulin resistance) or PIO (an insulin sensitizer). In the present study, unlike PDGF treatment (48 hr) that enhanced IRS serine phosphorylation and diminished IRS2 expression, exposure of human aortic VSMCs to D-fructose (5.5 to 25 mM) for 48 hr resulted in a concentration-dependent increase in IRS1 serine phosphorylation (up to ~5-fold , n = 3), but without any changes in IRS2 protein expression. In D-fructose-treated VSMCs, Akt phosphorylation in response to acute insulin exposure (6 min) was markedly decreased (~69%, n = 3), suggesting that IRS1 serine phosphorylation alone is sufficient to dysregulate insulin receptor signaling. In addition, D-fructose treatment led to a further increase in PDGF-induced VSMC proliferation (~40%, n = 3). Furthermore, we examined the effects of PIO on PDGF-induced dysregulation of IRS in VSMCs. Notably, PIO treatment (30 μM, 48 hr) by itself led to an upregulation of IRS-2 expression (~2.5-fold) and also diminished PDGF-induced IRS1 serine phosphorylation (~63%). Under these conditions, PIO treatment resulted in significant inhibition of PDGF-induced cyclin D1 expression, Rb phosphorylation, and VSMC proliferation (~83%, n = 3). In conclusion, the present study reveals that dysregulated insulin signaling (by PDGF and fructose) is associated with enhanced VSMC proliferation, whereas insulin sensitization (by PIO) is associated with inhibition of VSMC proliferation. Together, these findings underscore the significance of intact insulin signaling toward limiting exaggerated VSMC proliferation in the vessel wall.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 633-633
Author(s):  
A. Koneti Rao ◽  
Robert Freishtat ◽  
Gauthami Jalagadugula ◽  
Anamika Singh ◽  
Guangfen Mao ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 633 Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients have increased incidence of acute vascular events, due in part to a prothrombotic/proinflammatory state with elevated plasma coagulation factors and enhanced platelet responsiveness. The hallmarks of T2DM, hyperglycemia (HG) and hyperinsulinemia (HI), are independent risk factors for mortality but their contributions to the prothrombotic mechanisms are unclear. Our prior studies in healthy non-diabetic subjects using infusion clamps showed that selective HI and HG, and more so the combination of HI+HG, increased circulating membrane-bound tissue factor-procoagulant activity (TF-PCA), plasma coagulation factor (F) VIII, and markers of thrombin generation. In addition, HI+HG induced platelet and monocyte activation and upregulated monocyte TF. In T2DM and type 1 DM patients, TF-PCA and FVII were elevated under basal conditions. To understand mechanisms underlying these prothrombotic changes in platelets and monocytes, we performed expression profiling of leukocyte-depleted platelets and monocytes before and after 24 h of HG+HI clamping in a healthy non-diabetic subject using U133 Plus 2.0 GeneChips (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). Glucose was maintained ∼200 mg/dl by glucose infusion, which elevates endogenous insulin levels to induce HI. Profiling data was analyzed in Genomics Suite™ (Partek Inc.) to detect differentially expressed mRNAs. We generated a list of time-dependent differential mRNA expression (24 h fold change ≥2) common to both platelets and monocytes. Identification of biological pathways in which these genes may be critical players was determined in Ingenuity Pathways Analysis software. In particular, the insulin receptor signaling and coagulation canonical pathways were highly altered for both platelets and monocytes. A preliminary group of up or downregulated genes was selected from these for qRT-PCR confirmation (Table). For additional validity, the 24 h platelet sample was compared to the 0 h sample and 4 normal controls. Notably, 8 out of the 9 selected transcripts were confirmed in platelets and/or monocytes (Table, asterisks). In platelets, these include ↑GSK3B, ↓STXBP4 (Synip), ↑PTPN11 (platelet phosphatase SHP2) in insulin signaling, and ↑F3 (tissue-factor) and ↑TFPI on the coagulation side. In monocytes, there was downregulation of STXBP4, PIK3C3, PTPN11 and TFPI. The upregulation of platelet TF is a potentially important finding and is associated with possible compensatory up-regulation of TFPI, the principal TF inhibitor present in platelets and megakaryocytes, and GSK3B, a negative regulator of TF synthesis. To confirm this, we studied TF protein from the same subject. In isolated platelets and monocytes TF antigen (ELISA) increased 2-fold (8 to 16 pg/mg protein) and 5-fold (0.6 to 2.9 pg/mg), respectively. In addition, TF-PCA in whole blood increased (7.9 to 69.7 u/mL) over 24 h. Because of limited protein available, we were only able to immunoblot for GSKb3 (↑∼34%) and PTPN11 (↑∼42%). Taken together, these studies support the hypothesis that HG+HI, even in the non-diabetic state, induces demonstrable changes in platelets including alterations in insulin-signaling and coagulation pathways. Further studies in healthy subjects and DM patients will validate and better define these alterations and their cumulative prothrombotic effects. Table 1. Expression Profile and qRT-PCR Fold Changes for Selected Insulin Receptor Signaling and Coagulation Transcripts Gene Symbol Gene Title Platelets Monocytes Fold Change Expression (24 vs. 0 hrs) Fold Change qRT-PCR (24hrs vs. 0 hours and 4) Normals Fold Change Expression (24 vs. 0 hrs) Fold Change qRT-PCR (24 vs. 0 hrs) IRS1 Insulin receptor substrate 1 0.14 2.451 (2.27, 2.64) 0.73 0.88 (0.72, 1.08) INSR Insulin receptor 0.23 1.00 (0.83, 1.21) 0.89 0.88* (0.86, 0.91) GSK3B Glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta 5.51 1.62* (1.52, 1.74) 1.05 0.87 (0.83, 0.91) F3 Tissue factor 3.74 7.08* (1.08, 46.32) 0.40 1.12 (1.01, 1.23) TFPI Tissue factor pathway inhibitor 4.48 1.30* (1.26, 1.35) 0.79 0.66* (0.56, 0.79) VAMP2 Vesicle-associated membrane protein 2 14.29 0.82 (0.75, 0.89) 0.86 0.85* (0.83, 0.86) STXBP4 Syntaxin binding protein 4 0.13 0.87* (0.87, 0.88) 0.97 0.91* (0.83, 0.99) PIK3C3 Phosphoinositide-3-kinase class 3 0.31 1.37 (1.31, 1.44) 0.16 0.81* (0.75, 0.87) PTPN11 Protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type II 13.00 1.97* (1.56, 2.49) 0.60 0.65* (0.65, 0.65) Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2007 ◽  
Vol 192 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsun-Jui Liu ◽  
Hui-Chin Lai ◽  
Chih-Tai Ting ◽  
Ping H Wang

Signaling pathways of IGF-I and insulin receptors play important roles in the regulation of myocardial function. FOXO1 is a member of the forkhead transcriptional factor family, but how insulin and IGF-I receptor signaling regulate FOXO1 in cardiomyocytes is not well understood. This study was carried out to elucidate how IGF-I and insulin receptor signaling modulate FOXO1 in cardiomyocytes. In cardiomyocytes, activation of IGF-I receptor and insulin receptor lead to rapid phosphorylation of FOXO1. Inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway suppressed the effect of insulin and IGF-I on FOXO1 phosphorylation. Prolonged incubation with IGF-I increased ubiquitination of FOXO1 and down-regulated the abundance of FOXO1 proteins, which suggested that IGF-I might modulate FOXO1 degradation. To explore whether FOXO1 could modulate IGF-I and insulin signaling, a constitutively active FOXO1 was overexpressed in cardiomyocytes. The abundance of insulin receptor and IGF-I receptor was significantly upregulated in the cells overexpressing active FOXO1, accompanied by increased receptor phosphorylation upon insulin/IGF-I stimulation. Interestingly, overexpression of constitutively active FOXO1 also led to activation of MEK and Akt phosphorylation. IGF-I-stimulated MEK and Akt phosphorylation were augmented byoverexpression of constitutively active FOXO1. These findings indicate bidirectional regulation of insulin/IGF-I receptor signaling and FOXO1 in cardiomyocytes. FOXO1 may provide feedback control through upregulation of insulin and IGF-I receptor signaling.


2007 ◽  
Vol 282 (36) ◽  
pp. 26077-26088 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Frasca ◽  
Giuseppe Pandini ◽  
Roberta Malaguarnera ◽  
Angelo Mandarino ◽  
Rosa Linda Messina ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document