scholarly journals Assessment of the Effectiveness of a Computerised Decision-Support Tool for Health Professionals for the Prevention and Treatment of Childhood Obesity. Results from a Randomised Controlled Trial

Nutrients ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 706 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Moschonis ◽  
Maria Michalopoulou ◽  
Konstantina Tsoutsoulopoulou ◽  
Elpis Vlachopapadopoulou ◽  
Stefanos Michalacos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Childhood Obesity ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Decision Support Tool ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Support Tool ◽  
Randomised Controlled

We examined the effectiveness of a computerised decision-support tool (DST), designed for paediatric healthcare professionals, as a means to tackle childhood obesity. A randomised controlled trial was conducted with 65 families of 6–12-year old overweight or obese children. Paediatricians, paediatric endocrinologists and a dietitian in two children’s hospitals implemented the intervention. The intervention group (IG) received personalised meal plans and lifestyle optimisation recommendations via the DST, while families in the control group (CG) received general recommendations. After three months of intervention, the IG had a significant change in dietary fibre and sucrose intake by 4.1 and −4.6 g/day, respectively. In addition, the IG significantly reduced consumption of sweets (i.e., chocolates and cakes) and salty snacks (i.e., potato chips) by −0.1 and −0.3 portions/day, respectively. Furthermore, the CG had a significant increase of body weight and waist circumference by 1.4 kg and 2.1 cm, respectively, while Body Mass Index (BMI) decreased only in the IG by −0.4 kg/m2. However, the aforementioned findings did not differ significantly between study groups. In conclusion, these findings indicate the dynamics of the DST in supporting paediatric healthcare professionals to improve the effectiveness of care in modifying obesity-related behaviours. Further research is needed to confirm these findings.

scholarly journals Implementing an innovative integrated multi-infection screening digital decision support tool (IS-MiHealth) in primary care: lessons from Spain

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Requena
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Decision Support Tool ◽  
Multiple Infections ◽  
Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Support Tool ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Abstract Dr Requena will share new data from a pilot randomised controlled trial of a novel integrated multi-infection screening digital decision support tool, to promote screening for multiple infections in primary care in Spain among presenting migrants.

scholarly journals Video decision support tool for advance care planning in dementia: randomised controlled trial

BMJ ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 338 (may28 2) ◽  
pp. b2159-b2159 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Volandes ◽  
M. K. Paasche-Orlow ◽  
M. J. Barry ◽  
M. R. Gillick ◽  
K. L. Minaker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Decision Support Tool ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Support Tool ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
Randomised Controlled

scholarly journals Multicentre, randomised controlled trial of PDSAFE, a physiotherapist-delivered fall prevention programme for people with Parkinson’s

2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (7) ◽  
pp. 774-782 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim Chivers Seymour ◽  
Ruth Pickering ◽  
Lynn Rochester ◽  
Helen C Roberts ◽  
Claire Ballinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Fall Prevention ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Prevention Programme ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Chair Stand ◽  
Subgroup Analyses ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Fall Prevention Programme

ObjectiveTo estimate the effect of a physiotherapist-delivered fall prevention programme for people with Parkinson’s (PwP).MethodsPeople at risk of falls with confirmed Parkinson’s were recruited to this multicentre, pragmatic, investigator blind, individually randomised controlled trial with prespecified subgroup analyses. 474 PwP (Hoehn and Yahr 1–4) were randomised: 238 allocated to a physiotherapy programme and 236 to control. All participants had routine care; the control group received a DVD about Parkinson’s and single advice session at trial completion. The intervention group (PDSAFE) had an individually tailored, progressive home-based fall avoidance strategy training programme with balance and strengthening exercises. The primary outcome was risk of repeat falling, collected by self-report monthly diaries, 0–6 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes included Mini-BESTest for balance, chair stand test, falls efficacy, freezing of gait, health-related quality of life (EuroQol EQ-5D), Geriatric Depression Scale, Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly and Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire, fractures and rate of near falling.ResultsAverage age is 72 years and 266 (56%) were men. By 6 months, 116 (55%) of the control group and 125 (61.5%) of the intervention group reported repeat falls (controlled OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.98, p=0.447). Secondary subgroup analyses suggested a different response to the intervention between moderate and severe disease severity groups. Balance, falls efficacy and chair stand time improved with near falls reduced in the intervention arm.ConclusionPDSAFE did not reduce falling in this pragmatic trial of PwP. Other functional tasks improved and reduced fall rates were apparent among those with moderate disease.Trial registration numberISRCTN48152791.

scholarly journals Efficacy of a smartphone-based coaching program for addiction prevention among apprentices: study protocol of a cluster-randomised controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Severin Haug ◽  
Raquel Paz Castro ◽  
Andreas Wenger ◽  
Michael P. Schaub
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Cigarette Smoking ◽  
Internet Use ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Addiction Prevention ◽  
Cluster Randomised ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Abstract Background A large proportion of apprentices shows addictive behaviours like cigarette smoking, alcohol, cannabis, or compulsive Internet use, others do not show such behaviours at all. ready4life is a smartphone application-based coaching program for apprentices, which takes into account the heterogeneity of adolescent addictive behaviour by promoting life skills and reducing risk behaviours. The main objective of the planned study is to test the efficacy of ready4life for addiction prevention among apprentices in Switzerland within a controlled trial. Methods/design The efficacy of the ready4life coaching program will be tested in comparison to an assessment only control group, within a cluster-randomised controlled trial with one follow-up assessment after 6 months. At the beginning of the program, participants of the intervention group will receive an individual profile, showing areas in which they have sufficient resources and in which there is a need for coaching. Based on this feedback, they can select two out of the following six program modules: stress, social skills, Internet use, tobacco/e-cigarettes, cannabis, and alcohol. Participants of the intervention group will receive individualised coaching by a conversational agent (chatbot) for a period of four months. The coaching relies on motivational and social-cognitive principles of behaviour change. Within weekly dialogues, the coach provides individually tailored information in different formats, such as videoclips, texts, or pictures. Study participants will be 1318 apprentices with a minimum age of 15, recruited in approximately 100 vocational school classes in Switzerland. Primary outcome will be a composite measure for addictive behaviours including (1) at risk-drinking, (2) tobacco/e-cigarette smoking, (3) cannabis use, and (4) problematic Internet use. Discussion The study will reveal whether this universally implementable but individually tailored intervention approach is effective in preventing the onset and escalation of addictive behaviors among apprentices. Trial registration ISRCTN59908406 (registration date: 21/10/2020).

scholarly journals Postcards from the EDge: 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial for hospital-treated self-poisoning

2013 ◽  
Vol 202 (5) ◽  
pp. 372-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory L. Carter ◽  
Kerrie Clover ◽  
Ian M. Whyte ◽  
Andrew H. Dawson ◽  
Catherine D'Este
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Psychiatric Hospital ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Treatment As Usual ◽  
Psychiatric Admissions ◽  
Bed Days ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Event Rates

BackgroundRepetition of hospital-treated self-poisoning and admission to psychiatric hospital are both common in individuals who self-poison.AimsTo evaluate efficacy of postcard intervention after 5 years.MethodA randomised controlled trial of individuals who have self-poisoned: postcard intervention (eight in 12 months) plus treatment as usualv.treatment as usual. Our primary outcomes were self-poisoning admissions and psychiatric admissions (proportions and event rates).ResultsThere was no difference between groups for any repeat-episode self-poisoning admission (intervention group: 24.9%, 95% CI 20.6-29.5; control group: 27.2%, 95% CI 22.8-31.8) but there was a significant reduction in event rates (incidence risk ratio (IRR)=0.54, 95% CI 0.37-0.81), saving 306 bed days. There was no difference for any psychiatric admission (intervention group: 38.1%, 95% CI 33.1-43.2; control group: 35.5%, 95% CI 30.8-40.5) but there was a significant reduction in event rates (IRR=0.66, 95% CI 0.47-0.91), saving 2565 bed days.ConclusionsA postcard intervention halved self-poisoning events and reduced psychiatric admissions by a third after 5 years. Substantial savings occurred in general hospital and psychiatric hospital bed days.

scholarly journals Effects of a kindergarten intervention on vegetables served and staff’s food-related practices: results of a cluster randomised controlled trial – the BRA study

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 1117-1126
Author(s):  
Anne Himberg-Sundet ◽  
Anne Lene Kristiansen ◽  
Lene Frost Andersen ◽  
Mona Bjelland ◽  
Nanna Lien
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Vegetable Intake ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Cluster Randomised ◽  
Block Randomisation ◽  
Randomised Controlled

AbstractObjective:The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effect on frequency, variety and amount of vegetables served and staff’s food-related practices in the multicomponent BRA intervention.Design:Cluster randomised controlled trial, conducted between Spring 2015 and Spring 2016. For allocation of the kindergartens, a stratified block randomisation was used. Data were collected in three ways: (i) a questionnaire for pedagogical leaders assessing the variety and frequency of vegetables served, including staff’s food-related practices assumed to be related to vegetable intake; (ii) a questionnaire for kindergarten assistants assessing staff’s food-related practices; (iii) a 5-d weighted vegetable diary assessing amount of vegetables served in a department.Setting:The target group for this study was public and private kindergartens in the counties of Vestfold and Buskerud, Norway.Participants:A total of seventy-three kindergartens participated.Results:At follow-up I, the amount of vegetables served increased by approximately 20 g per person per day (P = 0·002), and the variety in served vegetables increased by one-and-a-half kind per month (P = 0·014) in the intervention group compared to the control group. No effects on the frequency of vegetables served or on staff’s food-related practices were found.Conclusions:The BRA intervention was successful in increasing the amount and variety of vegetables served within intervention kindergartens. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms that can affect the staff’s food-related practices.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of online tailored advice to prevent running-related injuries and promote preventive behaviour in Dutch trail runners: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (13) ◽  
pp. 851-858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luiz Carlos Hespanhol ◽  
Willem van Mechelen ◽  
Evert Verhagen
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Preventive Intervention ◽  
Absolute Risk ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Number Needed To Treat ◽  
Preventive Behaviour ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Tailored Advice

BackgroundTrail running is popular worldwide, but there is no preventive intervention for running-related injury (RRI).AimTo evaluate the effectiveness of adding online tailored advice (TrailS6) to general advice on (1) the prevention of RRIs and (2) the determinants and actual preventive behaviour in Dutch trail runners.MethodsTwo-arm randomised controlled trial over 6 months. 232 trail runners were randomly assigned to an intervention or control group. All participants received online general advice on RRI prevention 1 week after baseline. Every 2 weeks, participants in the intervention group received specific advice tailored to their RRI status. The control group received no further intervention. Bayesian mixed models were used to analyse the data.ResultsTrail runners in the intervention group sustained 13% fewer RRIs compared with those in the control group after 6 months of follow-up (absolute risk difference −13.1%, 95% Bayesian highest posterior credible interval (95% BCI) −23.3 to −3.1). A preventive benefit was observed in one out of eight trail runners who had received the online tailored advice for 6 months (number needed to treat 8, 95% BCI 3 to 22). No significant between-group difference was observed on the determinants and actual preventive behaviours.ConclusionsOnline tailored advice prevented RRIs among Dutch trail runners. Therefore, online tailored advice may be used as a preventive component in multicomponent RRI prevention programmes. No effect was observed on determinants and actual preventive behaviours.Trial registration numberThe Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR5431).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document