scholarly journals Water Balance Standardization Approach for Reconstructing Runoff Using GPS at the Basin Upstream

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 1767
Author(s):  
Hok Sum Fok ◽  
Linghao Zhou ◽  
Yongxin Liu ◽  
Robert Tenzer ◽  
Zhongtian Ma ◽  
...  

While in-situ estuarine discharge has been correlated and reconstructed well with localized remotely-sensed data and hydraulic variables since the 1990s, its correlation and reconstruction using averaged GPS-inferred water storage from satellite gravimetry (i.e., GRACE) at the basin upstream based on the water balance standardization (WBS) approach remains unexplored. This study aims to illustrate the WBS approach for reconstructing monthly estuarine discharge (in the form of runoff (R)) at Mekong River Delta, by correlating the averaged GPS-inferred water storage from GRACE of the upstream Mekong Basin with the in-situ R at the Mekong River Delta estuary. The resulting R based on GPS-inferred water storage is comparable to that inferred from GRACE, regardless of in-situ stations within Mekong River Delta being used for the R reconstruction. The resulting R from the WBS approach with GPS water storage converted by GRACE mascon solution attains the lowest normalized root-mean-square error of 0.066, and the highest Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.974 and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency of 0.950. Regardless of using either GPS-inferred or GRACE-inferred water storage, the WBS approach shows an increase of 1–4% in accuracy when compared to those reconstructed from remotely-sensed water balance variables. An external assessment also exhibits similar accuracies when examining the R estimated at another station location. By comparing the reconstructed and estimated Rs between the entrance and the estuary mouth, a relative error of 1–4% is found, which accounts for the remaining effect of tidal backwater on the estimated R. Additional errors might be caused by the accumulated errors from the proposed approach, the unknown signals in the remotely-sensed water balance variables, and the variable time shift across different years between the Mekong Basin at the upstream and the estuary at the downstream.

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 996
Author(s):  
Hok Sum Fok ◽  
Yutong Chen ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
Robert Tenzer ◽  
Qing He

Basin runoff is a quantity of river discharge per unit basin area monitored close to an estuary mouth, essential for providing information on the flooding and drought conditions of an entire river basin. Owing to a decreasing number of in situ monitoring stations since the late 1970s, basin runoff estimates using remote sensing have been advocated. Previous runoff estimates of the entire Mekong Basin calculated from the water balance equation were achieved through the hybrid use of remotely sensed and model-predicted data products. Nonetheless, these basin runoff estimates revealed a weak consistency with the in situ ones. To address this issue, we provide a newly improved estimate of the monthly Mekong Basin runoff by using the terrestrial water balance equation, purely based on remotely sensed water balance component data products. The remotely sensed water balance component data products used in this study included the satellite precipitation from the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM), the satellite evapotranspiration from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), and the inferred terrestrial water storage from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE). A comparison of our new estimate and previously published result against the in situ runoff indicated a marked improvement in terms of the Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC), reaching 0.836 (the new estimate) instead of 0.621 (the previously published result). When a three-month moving-average process was applied to each data product, our new estimate further reached a PCC of 0.932, along with the consistent improvement revealed from other evaluation metrics. Conducting an error analysis of the estimated mean monthly runoff for the entire data timespan, we found that the usage of different evapotranspiration data products had a substantial influence on the estimated runoff. This indicates that the choice of evapotranspiration data product is critical in the remotely sensed runoff estimation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin J. Lovell

Alternative wetting and drying (AWD) is an increasingly popular water-saving practice in rice production in the Vietnamese Mekong River Delta, especially considering the impact of projected climate change and reduced water availability. Unfortunately, it is very difficult to determine adoption without deploying thousands of costly household surveys. This research used European Space Agency Sentinel-1a and 1b radar data, combined with in-situ moisture readings, to determine AWD adoption through change detection of a time series wetness index (WI). By using a beta coefficient of the radar data, the WI avoided the pitfalls of cloud cover, surface roughness, and vegetative interference that arise from the sigma coefficient data. The analysis illustrated an AWD adoption likelihood scale across the delta and it showed potential for the use of remotely sensed data to detect adoption. Trends across the Vietnamese delta showed higher adoption rates inland, with lower adoption of AWD in the coastal provinces. These results were supported by a simultaneous effort to collect household level adoption data as part of the same project. However, correlation between the WI values and in situ soil moisture meter readings were most accurate in alluvial soils, illustrating a particularly strong relationship between soil type and WI model robustness. The research suggests that future change detection efforts should focus on retrieving a multi-season dataset and employing a power density analysis on the time series data to fully understand the periodicity of dry down patterns.


2019 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. 71-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin Kontgis ◽  
Annemarie Schneider ◽  
Mutlu Ozdogan ◽  
Christopher Kucharik ◽  
Van Pham Dang Tri ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e929 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn E. Holt ◽  
Christiane Dolecek ◽  
Tran Thuy Chau ◽  
Pham Thanh Duy ◽  
Tran Thi Phi La ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document