scholarly journals Comparing Person-Specific and Independent Models on Subject-Dependent and Independent Human Activity Recognition Performance

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (13) ◽  
pp. 3647
Author(s):  
Sebastian Scheurer ◽  
Salvatore Tedesco ◽  
Brendan O’Flynn ◽  
Kenneth N. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Activity Recognition ◽  
Human Activity ◽  
Recognition Performance ◽  
Human Activity Recognition ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Specific Target ◽  
Single Person ◽  
Target User ◽  
The Subject

The distinction between subject-dependent and subject-independent performance is ubiquitous in the human activity recognition (HAR) literature. We assess whether HAR models really do achieve better subject-dependent performance than subject-independent performance, whether a model trained with data from many users achieves better subject-independent performance than one trained with data from a single person, and whether one trained with data from a single specific target user performs better for that user than one trained with data from many. To those ends, we compare four popular machine learning algorithms’ subject-dependent and subject-independent performances across eight datasets using three different personalisation–generalisation approaches, which we term person-independent models (PIMs), person-specific models (PSMs), and ensembles of PSMs (EPSMs). We further consider three different ways to construct such an ensemble: unweighted, κ -weighted, and baseline-feature-weighted. Our analysis shows that PSMs outperform PIMs by 43.5% in terms of their subject-dependent performances, whereas PIMs outperform PSMs by 55.9% and κ -weighted EPSMs—the best-performing EPSM type—by 16.4% in terms of the subject-independent performance.

scholarly journals Deep learning and model personalization in sensor-based human activity recognition

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Ferrari ◽  
Daniela Micucci ◽  
Marco Mobilio ◽  
Paolo Napoletano
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Activity Recognition ◽  
Human Activity ◽  
Wearable Sensors ◽  
Human Activity Recognition ◽  
Population Diversity ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Machine Learning Techniques ◽  
Learning Techniques

AbstractHuman activity recognition (HAR) is a line of research whose goal is to design and develop automatic techniques for recognizing activities of daily living (ADLs) using signals from sensors. HAR is an active research filed in response to the ever-increasing need to collect information remotely related to ADLs for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Traditionally, HAR used environmental or wearable sensors to acquire signals and relied on traditional machine-learning techniques to classify ADLs. In recent years, HAR is moving towards the use of both wearable devices (such as smartphones or fitness trackers, since they are daily used by people and they include reliable inertial sensors), and deep learning techniques (given the encouraging results obtained in the area of computer vision). One of the major challenges related to HAR is population diversity, which makes difficult traditional machine-learning algorithms to generalize. Recently, researchers successfully attempted to address the problem by proposing techniques based on personalization combined with traditional machine learning. To date, no effort has been directed at investigating the benefits that personalization can bring in deep learning techniques in the HAR domain. The goal of our research is to verify if personalization applied to both traditional and deep learning techniques can lead to better performance than classical approaches (i.e., without personalization). The experiments were conducted on three datasets that are extensively used in the literature and that contain metadata related to the subjects. AdaBoost is the technique chosen for traditional machine learning, while convolutional neural network is the one chosen for deep learning. These techniques have shown to offer good performance. Personalization considers both the physical characteristics of the subjects and the inertial signals generated by the subjects. Results suggest that personalization is most effective when applied to traditional machine-learning techniques rather than to deep learning ones. Moreover, results show that deep learning without personalization performs better than any other methods experimented in the paper in those cases where the number of training samples is high and samples are heterogeneous (i.e., they represent a wider spectrum of the population). This suggests that traditional deep learning can be more effective, provided you have a large and heterogeneous dataset, intrinsically modeling the population diversity in the training process.

Human Action Recognition Using Median Background and Max Pool Convolution with Nearest Neighbor

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 34-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bagavathi Lakshmi ◽  
S.Parthasarathy
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Activity Recognition ◽  
Action Recognition ◽  
Human Activity ◽  
Nearest Neighbor ◽  
Human Action Recognition ◽  
Human Action ◽  
Human Activity Recognition ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Support Vector

Discovering human activities on mobile devices is a challenging task for human action recognition. The ability of a device to recognize its user's activity is important because it enables context-aware applications and behavior. Recently, machine learning algorithms have been increasingly used for human action recognition. During the past few years, principal component analysis and support vector machines is widely used for robust human activity recognition. However, with global dynamic tendency and complex tasks involved, this robust human activity recognition (HAR) results in error and complexity. To deal with this problem, a machine learning algorithm is proposed and explores its application on HAR. In this article, a Max Pool Convolution Neural Network based on Nearest Neighbor (MPCNN-NN) is proposed to perform efficient and effective HAR using smartphone sensors by exploiting the inherent characteristics. The MPCNN-NN framework for HAR consists of three steps. In the first step, for each activity, the features of interest or foreground frame are detected using Median Background Subtraction. The second step consists of organizing the features (i.e. postures) that represent the strongest generic discriminating features (i.e. postures) based on Max Pool. The third and the final step is the HAR based on Nearest Neighbor that postures which maximizes the probability. Experiments have been conducted to demonstrate the superiority of the proposed MPCNN-NN framework on human action dataset, KARD (Kinect Activity Recognition Dataset).

scholarly journals Using Domain Knowledge for Interpretable and Competitive Multi-Class Human Activity Recognition

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 1208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Scheurer ◽  
Salvatore Tedesco ◽  
Kenneth N. Brown ◽  
Brendan O’Flynn
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Activity Recognition ◽  
Human Activity ◽  
Domain Knowledge ◽  
Binary Classification ◽  
Large Body ◽  
Decomposition Methods ◽  
Human Activity Recognition ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Data Set

Human activity recognition (HAR) has become an increasingly popular application of machine learning across a range of domains. Typically the HAR task that a machine learning algorithm is trained for requires separating multiple activities such as walking, running, sitting, and falling from each other. Despite a large body of work on multi-class HAR, and the well-known fact that the performance on a multi-class problem can be significantly affected by how it is decomposed into a set of binary problems, there has been little research into how the choice of multi-class decomposition method affects the performance of HAR systems. This paper presents the first empirical comparison of multi-class decomposition methods in a HAR context by estimating the performance of five machine learning algorithms when used in their multi-class formulation, with four popular multi-class decomposition methods, five expert hierarchies—nested dichotomies constructed from domain knowledge—or an ensemble of expert hierarchies on a 17-class HAR data-set which consists of features extracted from tri-axial accelerometer and gyroscope signals. We further compare performance on two binary classification problems, each based on the topmost dichotomy of an expert hierarchy. The results show that expert hierarchies can indeed compete with one-vs-all, both on the original multi-class problem and on a more general binary classification problem, such as that induced by an expert hierarchy’s topmost dichotomy. Finally, we show that an ensemble of expert hierarchies performs better than one-vs-all and comparably to one-vs-one, despite being of lower time and space complexity, on the multi-class problem, and outperforms all other multi-class decomposition methods on the two dichotomous problems.

scholarly journals Human Activity Recognition using Deep and Machine Learning Algorithms

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 2460-2466 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Activity Recognition ◽  
Human Activity ◽  
Multilayer Perceptron ◽  
Human Activity Recognition ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Gradient Boosting ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Decision Tree Classifier ◽  
Tree Classifier

Activity recognition in humans is one of the active challenges that finds its application in numerous fields such as, medical health care, military, manufacturing, assistive techniques and gaming. Due to the advancements in technologies the usage of smartphones in human lives become inevitable. The sensors in the smartphones help us to measure the essential vital parameters. These measured parameters enable us to monitor the activities of humans, which we call as human activity recognition. In this paper, we have proposed an automatic human activity recognition system that independently recognizes the actions of the humans. Four deep learning approaches and thirteen different machine learning classifiers such as Multilayer Perceptron, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree Classifier, AdaBoost Classifier, Gradient Boosting Classifier and others are applied to identify the efficient classifier for human activity recognition. Our proposed system is able to recognize the activities such as Laying, Sitting, Standing, Walking, Walking downstairs and Walking upstairs. Benchmark dataset has been used to evaluate all the classifiers implemented. We have investigated all these classifiers to identify a best suitable classifier for this dataset. The results obtained show that, the Multilayer Perceptron has obtained 98.46% of overall accuracy in detecting the activities. The second-best performance was observed when the classifiers are combined together.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document