scholarly journals Effect of Biochar Amendment on Methane Emissions from Paddy Field under Water-Saving Irrigation

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanan Xiao ◽  
Shihong Yang ◽  
Junzeng Xu ◽  
Jie Ding ◽  
Xiao Sun ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Shihong Yang ◽  
Zewei Jiang ◽  
Xiao Sun ◽  
Jie Ding ◽  
Junzeng Xu

The role of carbon pool of biochar as a method of long-term C sequestration in global warming mitigation is unclear. A two-year field study was conducted to investigate the seasonal variations of CO2 emissions from water-saving irrigation paddy fields in response to biochar amendment and irrigation patterns. Three biochar treatments under water-saving irrigation and one biochar treatment under flooding irrigation were studied, and the application rates were 0, 20, 40, and 40 t ha−1 and labeled as CI + NB (controlled irrigation and none biochar added), CI + MB (controlled irrigation and medium biochar added), CI + HB (controlled irrigation and high biochar added), and FI + HB (flood irrigation and high biochar added), respectively. Results showed that biochar application at medium rates (20 t ha−1) decreased CO2 emissions by 1.64–8.83% in rice paddy fields under water-saving irrigation, compared with the non-amendment treatment. However, the CO2 emissions from paddy fields increased by 4.39–5.43% in the CI + HB treatment, compared with CI + NB. Furthermore, the mean CO2 emissions from paddy fields under water-saving irrigation decreased by 2.22% compared with flood irrigation under the same amount of biochar application (40 t ha−1). Biochar amendment increased rice yield and water use efficiency by 9.35–36.30% and 15.1–42.5%, respectively, when combined with water-saving irrigation. The CO2 emissions were reduced in the CI + MB treatment, which then increased rice yield. The CO2 emissions from paddy fields were positively correlated with temperature. The highest value of the temperature sensitivity coefficient (Q10) was derived for the CI + MB treatment. The Q10 was higher under water-saving irrigation compared with flooding irrigation.


2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Da Dong ◽  
Qibo Feng ◽  
Kim McGrouther ◽  
Min Yang ◽  
Hailong Wang ◽  
...  

Chemosphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 128774
Author(s):  
Zhenhua Zhao ◽  
liling Xia ◽  
Zhirui Qin ◽  
Jingjing Cao ◽  
Abduelrahman Adam Omer Mohammed ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 885-891 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadayoshi Hitomi ◽  
Yusaku Iwamoto ◽  
Asa Miura ◽  
Koji Hamada ◽  
Kyoji Takaki ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 281 ◽  
pp. 117026
Author(s):  
Qianqian Zhang ◽  
Zhen Wu ◽  
Xi Zhang ◽  
Pengpeng Duan ◽  
Haojie Shen ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 103380
Author(s):  
Abdulkareem Raheem ◽  
Tianshu Wang ◽  
Jing Huang ◽  
Frederick Danso ◽  
Oluwaseyi Oyewale Bankole ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Takashi S. T. Tanaka ◽  
Yoshiro Nitta ◽  
Kaoru Kido ◽  
Tomohiro Nishikawa ◽  
Toru Matoh ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 196-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yifan Shi ◽  
Yunsheng Lou ◽  
Zhen Zhang ◽  
Li Ma ◽  
Moses A Ojara

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document