scholarly journals Concentration and Variability of Urinary Phthalate Metabolites, Bisphenol A, Triclosan, and Parabens in Korean Mother–Infant Pairs

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (20) ◽  
pp. 8516
Author(s):  
Ju Hee Kim ◽  
Dae Ryong Kang ◽  
Jung Min Kwak ◽  
Jung Kuk Lee

Concentrations of toxic chemicals in mothers highly correlate with those in their children; moreover, the levels are higher in children than in mothers. Non-persistent chemicals with a short half-life including phthalate metabolites, bisphenol A (BPA), triclosan (TCS), and parabens are metabolized and excreted through urine. Therefore, we assessed the urine concentrations of phthalate metabolites, BPA, TCS, and parabens; correlated the concentrations with exposure levels; and assessed the within-individual variability of these chemicals in mothers and their infants. We collected 225 and 71 samples from 45 mothers and 36 infants, respectively. For the variability analysis, 189 and 42 samples were collected from nine mothers and their infants, respectively. The median concentrations of phthalate metabolites in the mothers and infants were 0.53–26.2 and 0.81–61.8 μg/L, respectively, and those of BPA, TCS, and parabens were 0.24–76.3 and 2.06–12.5 μg/L, respectively. The concentrations of monoethyl phthalate (MEP), mono-N-butyl phthalate (MnBP), mono-isobutyl phthalate (MiBP), and BPA in the mothers were positively correlated with those in infants (0.45, 0.62, and 0.89, respectively; p < 0.05), whereas toxic chemical concentrations in infants were higher than those in the mothers. With respect to the within-individual intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the first morning void (FMV) of the mothers had high ICCs for all chemicals (range: 0.72–0.99), except for BPA, monobenzyl phthalate (MBzP), and monocarboxyoctyl phthalate (MCOP). The ICC values of most chemicals were moderate to high (range: 0.34–0.99) in the first morning void. However, there were different patterns of ICCs in the infants. These findings indicate the importance of mother–infant pair studies and the necessity of research in infants, as they have different exposure sources and pathways from adults.

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 29-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo Koerich de Paula ◽  
Priscilla de Almeida Solon-de-Mello ◽  
Claudia Trindade Mattos ◽  
Antônio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas ◽  
Eduardo Franzotti Sant'Anna

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of magnification and superimposition of structures on CBCT-generated lateral cephalometric radiographs (LCR) using different segments of the cranium. METHODS: CBCT scans of 10 patients were selected. Four LCR were generated using Dolphin Imaging(r) software: full-face, right side, left side and center of the head. A total of 40 images were imported into Radiocef Studio 2(r), and the angles of the most common cephalometric analyses were traced by the same observer twice and within a 10-day interval. Statistical analyses included intraexaminer agreement and comparison between methods by means of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman agreement tests. RESULTS: Intraexaminer agreement of the angles assessed by ICC was excellent (> 0.90) for 83% of measurements, good (between 0.75 and 0.90) for 15%, and moderate (between 0.50 and 0.75) for 2% of measurements. The comparison between methods by ICC was excellent for 68% of measurements, good for 26%, and moderate for 6%. Variables presenting wider confidence intervals (> 6o) in the Bland-Altman tests, in intraexaminer assessment, were: mandibular incisor angle, maxillary incisor angle, and occlusal plane angle. And in comparison methods the variables with wider confidence interval were: mandibular incisor, maxillary incisor, GoGn, occlusal plane angle, Frankfort horizontal plane (FHP), and CoA. CONCLUSION: Superimposition of structures seemed to influence the results more than magnification, and neither one of them significantly influenced the measurements. Considerable individual variability may occur, especially for mandibular and maxillary incisors, FHP and occlusal plane.


2021 ◽  
Vol 146 ◽  
pp. 106171
Author(s):  
Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón ◽  
Andrea Bellavia ◽  
Audrey J. Gaskins ◽  
Jorge E. Chavarro ◽  
Jennifer B. Ford ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Todd Hagobian ◽  
Allison Smouse ◽  
Mikaela Streeter ◽  
Chloe Wurst ◽  
Andrew Schaffner ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 124 (3) ◽  
pp. 321-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Marie Jukic ◽  
Antonia M. Calafat ◽  
D. Robert McConnaughey ◽  
Matthew P. Longnecker ◽  
Jane A. Hoppin ◽  
...  

SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A399-A399
Author(s):  
C Weiss ◽  
M Kwon ◽  
S Dickerson ◽  
G Dean

Abstract Introduction Lung cancer survivors (LCS) have the second-highest incidence of impaired sleep among cancer population. Clinical studies use self-reported and objective measures to assess insomnia in LCS. However, negative beliefs of sleep patterns may impair sleep perception, impact psychological state, and influence insomnia treatment and survivorship outcomes. This study aims to assess the level of agreement between subjective and objective sleep measures in LCS. Methods Forty-four non-small cell lung cancer survivors, stage I-III, at least 6 weeks after treatment completion, with Insomnia Severity Index &gt;7, were recruited from two sites from 2014-2016. Individuals with sleep apnea, menopause, rotating shift work, uncontrolled substance abuse, or unstable medical/psychiatric illnesses were excluded from the study. Agreement between total sleep time (TST), sleep latency (SL) and sleep efficiency (SE) from Sleep Diary and wrist-actigraphy (i.e. CamNtech) were assessed with Intraclass Correlation (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots. Analysis of ICC, mean difference, standard deviation (SD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were conducted using SPSS 24. Results LCS were male (63.6%), 60-69 years old (52.3%), married or living with a partner (50%). Self-reported measurements underestimated TST (-68.2 minutes, ICC 0.45, CI 95%, SD 108.1) and SL (-25.9 minutes, ICC 95%, ICC -0.54, DS 17.5). Objective and self-reported measurements largely overlapped for SE, with a small actigraphy-based overestimation (9.2, ICC 0.2, CI95%, SD 7.3). Bland-Altman plots revealed that the agreement increased with lower SE values. Conclusion LCS tended to underestimate TST and SL. An apparent agreement between objective and self-reported measures for SE may indicate sleep state misperception. Differences in various sleep parameters and potential covariates should be investigated for contribution to the unexplained considerable individual variability in behavioral treatment response among cancer survivors in larger sample sizes. Support 1R01NR018215-01 (GED); T32GM099607(CW).


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (26) ◽  
pp. 26685-26695 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoonjeong Choi ◽  
Sun Ju Lee ◽  
Jooeun Jeon ◽  
Keum Ji Jung ◽  
Sun Ha Jee

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document