scholarly journals Land Use Allocation Based on a Multi-Objective Artificial Immune Optimization Model: An Application in Anlu County, China

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 15632-15651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoya Ma ◽  
Xiang Zhao
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (23) ◽  
pp. 13219
Author(s):  
Xuesong Feng ◽  
Zhibin Tao ◽  
Xuejun Niu ◽  
Zejing Ruan

Taking into consideration the overlapped influences of multiple rail transit stations upon land use characteristics, this study newly develops a multi-objective land use allocation optimization model to decide the land use type and intensity of every undeveloped land block of an urban area. The new model is solved by successively utilizing the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm and the technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution to obtain the least biased Pareto-optimal land development scheme. The study area is an urban region around two metro stations in Beijing of China. The influencing scopes of these two stations are overlapped in part, and many of the land blocks in the study area are not yet developed. It is shown that the newly developed land use allocation optimization model is able to rationally achieve multi-objectives in coordination to the most extents for the sustainable urban development in view of the integrated effect of multiple rail transit stations.


Author(s):  
Mehran Shaygan ◽  
Abbas Alimohammadi ◽  
Ali Mansourian ◽  
Zohreh Shams Govara ◽  
S. Mostapha Kalami

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 927 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guadalupe Azuara García ◽  
Efrén Palacios Rosas ◽  
Alfonso García-Ferrer ◽  
Pilar Montesinos Barrios

2019 ◽  
Vol 118 ◽  
pp. 241-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Strauch ◽  
Anna F. Cord ◽  
Carola Pätzold ◽  
Sven Lautenbach ◽  
Andrea Kaim ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Kaim ◽  
Michael Strauch ◽  
Martin Volk

One way to solve multi-objective spatial land use allocation problems is to calculate a set of Pareto-optimal solutions and include stakeholder preferences after the optimization process. There are various land use allocation studies that identify the Pareto frontier (i.e., trade-off curve); to our knowledge, however, for the majority of them, the debate on which solutions are preferred by stakeholders or are preferred by stakeholders remains open. One reason could be that Pareto-optimal solutions, due to their multi-dimensionality, are difficult to communicate. To fill this gap, we give an example using the results of a multi-objective agricultural land use allocation problem that maximizes four biophysical objectives: agricultural production, water quality, water quantity, and biodiversity in the Lossa River Basin in Central Germany. We conducted expert interviews with 11 local stakeholders from different backgrounds, e.g., water experts, nature conservationists, farmers, etc. In addition to providing information about the case study area, we visualized the trade-offs between the different objectives using parallel coordinates plots that allowed the stakeholders to browse through the optimal solutions. Based on this information, the stakeholders set weights for each of the objectives by applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). With these weights, we selected the preferred solutions from the Pareto-optimal set. The results show that, overall, stakeholders clearly ranked water quality first, followed by biodiversity, water quantity, and agricultural production. The corresponding land use maps show a huge difference in land management (e.g., less application of fertilizer, more linear elements, and conservation tillage) for the preferred solutions compared to the current status. The method presented in this study can help decision makers finding land use and land management strategies based on both biophysical modeling results and stakeholder expertise, and it shows how multi-objective optimization results can be communicated and used for an information-based decision-making process.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document