Fair value measurement of inventories and property, plant and equipment in the Russian accounting of organizations that are not budgetary sphere organizations: scope and features of formation

2021 ◽  
pp. 6-15
Author(s):  
Emilia Sergeevna Druzhilovskaya
Keyword(s):  
Method Comparison ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Healthcare Organizations ◽  
Accounting Standard ◽  
Broad Application ◽  
Fair Value Measurement ◽  
Analysis And Synthesis ◽  
Grouping Method ◽  
Value Measurement ◽  
First Time

The Federal Accounting Standard (FAS) 5/2019 “Inventories” provides for a fairly broad application of fair value measurement of the inventories of non-budgetary sphere organizations (including healthcare organizations). An even more active use of fair value is suggested by FAS 6/2020 for the measurement of property, plant and equipment of the aforementioned organizations. The specified value is entered into the domestic accounting of the listed assets for the first time and is unusual for many Russian accountants. All this indicates the relevance of a detailed study of issues related to the fair value measurement of inventories and property, plant and equipment of the aforementioned organizations. In this article, the scope and features of the formation of this measurement are investigated. Other issues related to this measurement will be analyzed by us in the next article. The research methods were analysis and synthesis, grouping method, comparison, analogy method, logical approach, systemic approach. As a result of the research carried out, the article defines the scope of the fair value measurement of inventories and property, plant and equipment in the Russian accounting of organizations that are not budgetary sphere organizations, analyzes the features of the formation of such a measurement of these assets, identifies the most important problematic issues in this area and identifies ways to solve them.

Valuation techniques and hierarchy of fair value of inventories and property, plant and equipment in the Russian accounting of organizations that are not budgetary sphere organizations

2021 ◽  
pp. 13-25
Author(s):  
Emilia Sergeevna Druzhilovskaya
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Method Comparison ◽  
Accounting Standards ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Capital Investments ◽  
Healthcare Organizations ◽  
Analogy Method ◽  
Logical Approach ◽  
Grouping Method ◽  
First Time

In the previous article, we analyzed the scope and features of the formation of fair value, which is entered into the Russian accounting of inventories and property, plant and equipment of non-budgetary sphere organizations (including healthcare organizations) thanks to the Federal Accounting Standards (FAS) 5/2019 “Inventories”, 6/2020 “Property, Plant and Equipment”, and 26/2020 “Capital Investments”. This article examines the valuation techniques and hierarchy of fair value of these assets. This study is all the more relevant since the fair value is entered into the Russian accounting of inventories and property, plant and equipment of non-budgetary organizations for the first time and it is still quite unusual for many domestic accountants. Analysis, synthesis, grouping method, comparison, analogy method, logical approach, and systemic approach were used as research methods. As a result of the research carried out, the article analyzes the fundamental issues in the field of valuation techniques and hierarchy of fair value of inventories and property, plant and equipment of non-budgetary sphere organizations (including healthcare organizations), identifies the most important problems in this area and presents recommendations for their solution.

Depreciation of property, plant and equipment in the new Federal Accounting Standard for non-public sector organizations

2021 ◽  
pp. 20-30
Author(s):  
Emilia Sergeevna Druzhilovskaya
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Method Comparison ◽  
Accounting Standards ◽  
Healthcare Organizations ◽  
Accounting Standard ◽  
Public Sector Organizations ◽  
Analysis And Synthesis ◽  
Subsequent Measurement ◽  
Grouping Method ◽  
Method Analysis

The new accounting requirements for property, plant and equipment are undoubtedly relevant for Russian organizations. In previous articles, we analyzed the rules for the initial and subsequent measurement of property, plant and equipment provided for by the new Federal Accounting Standards (FAS) for non-public sector organizations (including healthcare organizations). This article examines the requirements for depreciation of the property, plant and equipment, established by FAS 6/2020 “Property, plant and equipment” and put into effect for mandatory application already from January 1 of the next year. Research methods included such methods as grouping method, comparison, analogy method, analysis and synthesis, systemic and logical approaches. As a result of the research carried out, the article identifies the most important innovations of this FAS in relation to the depreciation of property, plant and equipment of non-public sector organizations, including healthcare organizations in this sector, identifies problematic issues in the above area and substantiates proposals for their solution.

Issues on the application of IFRS9 and fair value measurement for Islamic financial instruments

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 202-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zurina Shafii ◽  
Abdul Rahim Abdul Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Cash Flow ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Financial Assets ◽  
Financial Instruments ◽  
Fixed Rate ◽  
Accounting Standard ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Fair Value Measurement ◽  
Value Measurement

Purpose This paper aims to examine some issues in IFRS9 with regards to classification and measurement of Islamic financial assets. In addition, the paper discusses the Shariah concerns on the use of fair value to measure financial assets. Design/methodology/approach This paper adopts qualitative method via the study of documents and textual analysis of Shariah opinions of scholars and relevant accounting standards. Findings The paper found that the classification and measurement of equity-based Islamic financial assets do not fit into the “default” classification category of amortised cost, as the future cash flow receivable does not constitute solely the payment of principal and interest (fixed rate payment). With regards to fair value measurement, Shariah concern arises during the adoption of fair value at Level 2 (reference of asset values from input other than quoted prices in active markets) and Level 3 (use of discounted cash flow method to arrive to asset valuation) because of the existence of in uncertainty or gharar as compared to Level 1 (fair value referred to quoted prices of similar assets). Practical implications Findings of the paper provide a starting point for a debate and extensive research on issues related to classification and measurement of Islamic financial assets and the use of fair value as a method of subsequent revaluation of Islamic financial assets. The Shariah analysis in the paper is useful for International Accounting Standard Board to engage with Islamic financial institutions and local accounting standard setters to reflect the unique nature of Shariah-compliant financial instruments. The paper serves as a basis to devise technical solutions to address accounting and reporting issues of Islamic financial instruments. Originality/value The paper offers Shariah analysis on the issue of classification, measurement and impairment model for Islamic financial assets. The paper is considered as the first paper that examines areas of possible tensions when applying IFRS9 to the accounting of Islamic financial assets. In addition, the paper has contributed to the literature in Islamic accounting and auditing.

Accounting for impairment of property, plant and equipment of non-public sector organizations

2021 ◽  
pp. 25-37
Author(s):  
Emilia Sergeevna Druzhilovskaya
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Systematic Approach ◽  
Healthcare Organizations ◽  
Accounting Standard ◽  
Analogy Method ◽  
Public Sector Organizations ◽  
Analysis And Synthesis ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Grouping Method ◽  
Method Analysis

The new Federal Accounting Standard (FAS) 6/2020 “Property, Plant and Equipment”, which will come into force in 2022, requires non-public sector organizations (including healthcare organizations in this sector) to take into account the impairment of property, plant and equipment. Such accounting is qualitatively new for these organizations. Consequently, it is very important to conduct a separate research of the rules for determining and recording the impairment of property, plant and equipment of non-public sector organizations. This research is the subject of this article. As research methods, the following were used: grouping method, analysis and synthesis, comparison, analogy method, logical approach, systematic approach. As a result of the research carried out, the article focuses on the fundamental issues of accounting for the impairment of the property, plant and equipment of non-public sector organizations (including healthcare organizations in this sector), identifies the most important problematic issues in this area and presents proposals for their solution.

Modern features of accounting for borrowing costs

2021 ◽  
pp. 34-41
Author(s):  
E.S. Druzhilovskaya
Keyword(s):  
Method Comparison ◽  
Accounting Standard ◽  
Analogy Method ◽  
Borrowing Costs ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Analysis And Synthesis ◽  
Federal Standard ◽  
Accounting Rules ◽  
Grouping Method ◽  
Education Process

Accounting for borrowing costs is undoubtedly relevant for many modern organizations. It should be noted that from this year a new federal public finance accounting standard (FAS PF) “Borrowing costs” came into force. This standard establishes updated accounting rules for borrowing costs for state (municipal) budgetary and autonomous institutions (including healthcare institutions). These rules are analyzed in this article. The research methods were analysis and synthesis, grouping method, comparison, analogy method, logical approach, systemic approach. On the basis of the research carried out, the article systematizes the types and definitions of borrowing costs provided for by the above-named federal standard. As a result, the author presents a categorical apparatus in the indicated area. In addition, the article analyzes the most important features of accounting for borrowing costs and provides examples that explain these features. The results of the study can be useful to a wide range of readers interested in the problems of modern accounting, including accounting for borrowing costs of state (municipal) budgetary and autonomous institutions (in particular, healthcare institutions), and can also be applied in the practical work of the accounting departments of these institutions and in higher education process.

scholarly journals Does Market Welcome the International Convergence of Fair Value Standard in China?

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Dehong Wang ◽  
Jianbo Song ◽  
Yue Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Fair Value ◽  
Measurement Standard ◽  
Accounting Standard ◽  
Market Reactions ◽  
Fair Value Measurement ◽  
Draft Version ◽  
International Convergence ◽  
Application Of Cas ◽  
Value Measurement ◽  
The Way

This paper studies the international convergence of fair value measurement standard and examines market reactions towards the emergence of the standard in China. Through comparing the fair value measurement standard between IFRS 13 and newest Chinese accounting standard CAS 39, we find that CAS 39 is on the way of international convergence towards IFRS 13. Through examining market reactions to CAS 39, we find that market has significantly positive reactions to the draft version exposure, official announcement, and enforcement of CAS 39. Moreover, we find that investors have different attitudes to the applications of CAS 39 in financial and non-financial industries. Investors consistently support CAS 39 in non-financial industries. However, in financial industries, investors react positively in the draft version exposure of CAS 39, but negatively in the official announcement and enforcement of CAS 39. We believe that investors worry about the application of CAS 39 in Chinese financial industries.

The Relevance of the Fair Value Measurement Hierarchy: A Holistic Perspective

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrei Filip ◽  
Ahmad Hammami ◽  
Zhongwei Huang ◽  
Anne Jeny ◽  
Michel Magnan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fair Value ◽  
Holistic Perspective ◽  
Fair Value Measurement ◽  
Value Measurement
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document