Faculty Opinions recommendation of Phase III, open-label, randomized study comparing concurrent gemcitabine plus cisplatin and radiation followed by adjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin versus concurrent cisplatin and radiation in patients with stage IIB to IVA carcinoma of the cervix.

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Meyskens ◽  
Krish Tewari
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Study ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Gemcitabine And Cisplatin

CONTACT-01: A phase III, randomized study of atezolizumab plus cabozantinib versus docetaxel in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) previously treated with PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors and platinum-containing chemotherapy.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS9134-TPS9134
Author(s):  
Joel W. Neal ◽  
Palak Kundu ◽  
Tomohiro Tanaka ◽  
Ida Enquist ◽  
Sid Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Previously Treated

TPS9134 Background: Patients with mNSCLC who progress on anti–PD-L1/PD-1 therapy administered in combination with or after platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) are mainly treated with docetaxel or pemetrexed monotherapy. These therapies only have modest clinical activity, leaving a high unmet medical need. Cabozantinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), promotes an immune-permissive environment and may enhance the efficacy of PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors, offering a promising second/third-line therapeutic opportunity for patients with mNSCLC. In a Phase Ib multi-cohort study (COSMIC-021; NCT03170960), cabozantinib plus atezolizumab (anti–PD-L1) showed an acceptable safety profile and promising efficacy (ORR: 27%; mDOR: 5.7 mo [range: 2.6-6.9]; disease control rate [CR + PR + SD]: 83%) in 30 patients with mNSCLC who had progressed after prior anti–PD-L1/PD-1 therapy plus chemotherapy (Neal et al. J Clin Oncol 2020). The Phase III CONTACT-01 study will further evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus cabozantinib versus docetaxel monotherapy in patients with mNSCLC who have progressed during or after prior treatment with anti–PD-L1/PD-1 therapy and PBC. Methods: CONTACT-01 (NCT04471428) is a Phase III, multi-center, randomized, open-label study that will enroll ≈350 patients from 150 to 200 sites internationally. Key eligibility criteria include histologically or cytologically confirmed mNSCLC, disease progression with concurrent or sequential anti–PD-L1/PD-1 treatment and PBC, measurable disease (RECIST 1.1), ECOG PS of 0-1 and the availability of tissue specimens for centralized PD-L1 testing or known PD-L1 status using a health authority–approved PD-L1 assay. Patients with NSCLC previously treated with cabozantinib, docetaxel or anti–PD-L1/PD-1 + VEGFR TKIs are excluded. Patients with known sensitizing EGFR/ALK mutations and active or untreated CNS metastases are also excluded. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either atezolizumab (1200 mg IV every 3 weeks) + cabozantinib (40 mg orally once daily) or docetaxel (75 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include investigator-assessed PFS, ORR and DOR per RECIST 1.1; TTD in patient-reported physical function and global health status (EORTC QLQ-C30); investigator-assessed PFS rates at 6 months and 1 year; OS rates at 1 and 2 years; safety and PK. Clinical trial information: NCT04471428.

A Comparison of Sevoflurane with Halothane for Paediatric Day Case Surgery

1997 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 643-649 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Walker ◽  
R. D. Haugen ◽  
A. Richards
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Study ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Breath Holding ◽  
Day Case ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Day Case Surgery ◽  
Inhalational Induction ◽  
Rapid Induction ◽  
Respiratory Events ◽  
Case Surgery

A phase III, open label, randomized study was conducted in 50 patients comparing halothane and sevoflurane for paediatric day case surgery. A graded inhalational induction resulted in only slightly more rapid induction with sevoflurane (3.34±0.92 versus 3.85±1.02 minutes; P>0.05). In children receiving sevoflurane, systolic blood pressure decreased to a lesser extent during induction (14.3±19.2 versus 26.9±10.9 percent decrease from resting values; P<0.01) and heart rate was maintained. Respiratory events (coughing, breath-holding, bronchospasm, laryngospasm) were more common during induction with halothane, and excitement more common in children receiving sevoflurane. Emergence times were significantly more rapid in children who had received sevoflurane (21.4±10.9 versus 33.1 ±13.7 minutes; P<0.01). Objective pain/discomfort scores were higher in patients receiving sevoflurane at 10, 20, 30 and 40 minutes after arrival in the recovery room, and the incidence of excitement during emergence was higher in this group. It is concluded that sevoflurane is well tolerated for inhalational induction and has an improved cardiovascular profile compared to halothane. Emergence was significantly more rapid following sevoflurane.

A randomized, open-label, phase III study of lapatinib in combination with weekly paclitaxel versus weekly paclitaxel alone in the second-line treatment of HER2 amplified advanced gastric cancer (AGC) in Asian population: Tytan study.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yung-Jue Bang
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Study ◽  
Asian Population ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Weekly Paclitaxel ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Significant Prolongation ◽  
The Difference

11 Background: The use of trastuzumab has been established as the standard first-line treatment of HER2 positive (+) AGC. However, the role of anti-HER2 agents in the second-line treatment of HER2+ AGC has not been clearly established yet. TyTAN is the first randomized study to compare the efficacy and safety of adding lapatinib (L) to paclitaxel (P) vs P alone in the second-line treatment of HER2+ AGC. Methods: Eligibility required patients (pts) with AGC, amplification of HER2 by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and one prior regimen containing fluoropyrimidines and/or cisplatin. Pts were randomized 1:1 to L (1500mg QD) and P (80mg/m2, Day 1, 8, 15 q4w) or P alone. The treatments were given until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Stratification variables were prior trastuzumab treatment and gastrectomy status. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results: From March 2008 to June 2011, 1923 pts were screened and 430 pts were HER2+ AGC. 261 out of 430 pts were enrolled. All pts were from Asian countries: Japan (100), China (95), Korea (46), and Taiwan (20). Median OS was 11.0 months for L+P and 8.9 months for P alone in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (HR 0.84; p=0.2088). In a pre-planned subgroup analysis, median OS in HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+ subgroup was 14.0 months for L+P and 7.6 months for P alone (HR 0.59; p=0.0176). The endpoints in efficacy and AEs of special interest for L+P are summarized below (Table). Conclusions: Although OS was prolonged in L+P arm by 2 months, the difference was not statistically significant. HER2 IHC 3+ subgroup demonstrated statistically significant prolongation of OS by adding L. Clinical trial information: NCT00486954. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals One-year efficacy and safety of ravulizumab in adults with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria naïve to complement inhibitor therapy: open-label extension of a randomized study

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 204062072096613
Author(s):  
Hubert Schrezenmeier ◽  
Austin Kulasekararaj ◽  
Lindsay Mitchell ◽  
Flore Sicre de Fontbrune ◽  
Timothy Devos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Complement Inhibitor ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Evaluation Period ◽  
Open Label Extension ◽  
Primary Evaluation ◽  
Long Acting

Background: Ravulizumab, the only long-acting complement C5 inhibitor for adults with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), demonstrated non-inferiority to eculizumab after 26 weeks of treatment in complement inhibitor-naïve patients during a phase III randomized controlled trial. We present open-label extension results with up to 52 weeks of treatment. Methods: Patients assigned to ravulizumab every 8 weeks (q8w) or eculizumab every 2 weeks during the randomized primary evaluation period received ravulizumab q8w during the 26-week extension. Efficacy endpoints were lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) normalization, transfusion avoidance, breakthrough hemolysis (BTH), LDH levels, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue scale, and stabilized hemoglobin. Serum free C5 levels and safety were assessed. Outcomes as of the data cut-off (4 September 2018) were summarized using descriptive statistics. Results: Overall, 124 patients continued ravulizumab, and 119 switched from eculizumab to ravulizumab. During the extension, 43.5% and 40.3% of patients in the ravulizumab–ravulizumab and eculizumab–ravulizumab arms, respectively, achieved LDH normalization; 76.6% and 67.2% avoided transfusion. BTH decreased in the eculizumab–ravulizumab arm; no events were associated with free C5 ⩾0.5 μg/mL while receiving ravulizumab. Overall, 73.4% and 65.5% of patients in the ravulizumab–ravulizumab and eculizumab–ravulizumab arms, respectively, achieved stabilized hemoglobin. Similar proportions of patients achieved ⩾3-point improvement in FACIT-Fatigue at week 52 (ravulizumab–ravulizumab, 64.5%; eculizumab–ravulizumab, 57.1%). All patients maintained free C5 <0.5 μg/mL during the ravulizumab extension, including those who experienced C5 excursions ⩾0.5 μg/mL while receiving eculizumab during the primary evaluation period. Adverse events were comparable between groups and decreased over time. Conclusion: In adult, complement inhibitor–naïve patients with PNH, ravulizumab q8w for up to 52 weeks demonstrated durable efficacy and was well tolerated, with complete and sustained free C5 inhibition and a decreased incidence of BTH with no events associated with loss of free C5 control. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02946463

A phase III, open-label, randomized study of eribulin mesylate versus capecitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes: Subgroup analyses.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1049-1049 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Andrew Kaufman ◽  
Javier Cortes ◽  
Ahmad Awada ◽  
Louise Yelle ◽  
Edith A. Perez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Study ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Eribulin Mesylate ◽  
Prior Chemotherapy ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
Subgroup Analyses

1049^ Background: This phase III study, comparing eribulin versus capecitabine, showed a non-significant trend for superior overall survival (OS; hazard ratio [HR] 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77, 1.00]; p = 0.056) but not progression-free survival (PFS; HR 1.08 [95% CI 0.93, 1.25]; p = 0.31). Pre-specified exploratory subgroup analyses previously presented showed that patients with triple-negative, ER-negative or HER2-negative disease may have a greater benefit in OS with eribulin compared with capecitabine. Here we present further pre-specified exploratory analyses of OS and PFS. Methods: Patients (eribulin n=554; capecitabine n=548) with locally advanced or MBC had received ≤3 prior chemotherapy regimens (≤2 for advanced disease), including an anthracycline and a taxane. Patients were randomized (stratified for geographic region and HER2 status) 1:1 to 21-day cycles of eribulin mesylate 1.4 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 and 8 or capecitabine 1.25 g/m2BID orally on days 1-14. Further pre-specified exploratory subgroups included: age; receptor status; number and setting of prior chemotherapy regimen(s); sites of disease; number of organs involved; and time to progression after last chemotherapy. Results: From analyses for OS, patients with only non-visceral disease (HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.33, 0.80), with >2 organs involved (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.62, 0.90), who had progressed >6 months after last chemotherapy (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.52, 0.95), or who had received an anthracycline and/or a taxane in the metastatic setting (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.72, 0.98), appeared to benefit more from treatment with eribulin compared with capecitabine. For OS, in no subgroup was a trend favoring capecitabine seen. Data for other pre-specified subgroups for both OS and PFS will be presented. Conclusions: In addition to patients with triple-, ER-, or HER2-negative disease, further pre-specified exploratory analyses suggest that other patient subgroups may particularly benefit from treatment with eribulin; further studies are warranted to address these hypotheses. Clinical trial information: NCT00337103.

A phase II, open-label, randomized study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GS-5745 combined with nivolumab versus nivolumab alone in subjects with unresectable or recurrent gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4141-TPS4141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manish A. Shah ◽  
Jean-Philippe Metges ◽  
Patrick Youngwhan Chun ◽  
Victoria Smith ◽  
Julia D. Maltzman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Cell Polarization ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Matrix Remodeling ◽  
Cell Trafficking ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label

TPS4141 Background: GS-5745 is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9), an extracellular enzyme involved in matrix remodeling, tumor growth, and metastasis. Inhibiting MMP9 is expected to block paracrine signaling and metastasis and to alter the immune microenvironment within the tumor. Results from the ATTRACTION-2 Phase III trial showed the PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab significantly improved overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate (ORR) in patients with heavily pre-treated advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. Preclinical studies indicate that selective inhibition of MMP9 can inhibit immune-suppressive myeloid cell polarization, regulatory T cell generation, desmoplasia, and the destruction of ligands for CXCR3 (a critical chemokine receptor that enables effector T cell trafficking). In combination with a checkpoint inhibitor, CD8+, CD4+ and CD44+ cytotoxic T cells are significantly increased in a checkpoint-refractory model, suggesting that MMP9 inhibition could relieve immune suppression. Methods: This phase 2, open-label, randomized study investigates the efficacy and safety of GS-5745 combined with nivolumab versus nivolumab alone in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. 120 patients will be randomized to either GS-5745 800mg IV + nivolumab 3mg/kg IV, or nivolumab alone. Treatment will be administered every 2 weeks and stratified by PD-L1 status. CT will be performed every 8 weeks to evaluate response. The primary endpoint of the study is ORR; secondary endpoints include PFS, OS, and occurrence of adverse events. Key inclusion criteria: metastatic or inoperable adenocarcinoma of the stomach or GEJ which has progressed after ≥1 prior systemic therapy, ECOG performance status ≤1, RECISTv1.1 measureable disease, archival tissue adequate for PD-L1 evaluation. Exploratory biomarkers correlated with study drug response will also be evaluated. Enrollment opened September 2016. Clinical trial information: NCT02864381.

SAVOIR: A phase III study of savolitinib versus sunitinib in pts with MET-driven papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5002-5002
Author(s):  
Toni K. Choueiri ◽  
Daniel Yick Chin Heng ◽  
Jae-Lyun Lee ◽  
Mathilde Cancel ◽  
Remy B Verheijen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Chromosome 7 ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Modifications

5002 Background: PRCC is the most common type of non-clear cell RCC, accounting for 10–15% of renal malignancies. As a subset of PRCC cases are MET-driven, MET inhibition may be an appropriate targeted treatment approach. In a single-arm Phase II study, savolitinib (AZD6094, HMPL‐504, volitinib), a highly selective MET-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, demonstrated antitumor activity in pts with MET-driven PRCC (Choueiri et al. JCO 2017). The Phase III SAVOIR study (NCT03091192) further assessed savolitinib vs standard of care sunitinib in pts with MET-driven PRCC. Methods: In this open-label (sponsor blinded), randomized study, pts with centrally confirmed MET-driven ( MET and/or HGF amplification, chromosome 7 gain and/or MET kinase domain mutations), metastatic PRCC were randomized to savolitinib 600 mg once daily (QD), or sunitinib 50 mg QD 4 weeks on / 2 weeks off. Primary objective was progression-free survival (PFS; RECIST 1.1 by blinded independent central review). Secondary objectives included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety and tolerability. Results: After external data on predicted PFS with sunitinib in pts with MET-driven disease became available, study enrollment was closed. At data cutoff (Aug 2019), only 60 of the planned 180 pts were randomized (savolitinib n = 33; sunitinib n = 27). Most had chromosome 7 gain (savolitinib 91%; sunitinib 96%) and no prior therapy (savolitinib 85%; sunitinib 93%). PFS, OS, and ORR were numerically improved with savolitinib vs sunitinib (Table). CTCAE grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 42% and 81% of pts; dose modifications were related to AEs in 30% and 74% of pts with savolitinib and sunitinib respectively. After discontinuation, 36% of all savolitinib and 19% of all sunitinib pts received subsequent anticancer therapy. Conclusions: Although pt numbers and follow-up were limited, savolitinib demonstrated encouraging efficacy and an improved safety profile vs sunitinib, with fewer grade ≥3 AEs and fewer dose modifications required. Sunitinib performance was poorer than expected based on external retrospective data. Further investigation of savolitinib as a treatment option for MET-driven PRCC is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT03091192 . [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document