Faculty Opinions recommendation of Hospital mortality, length of stay, and preventable complications among critically ill patients before and after tele-ICU reengineering of critical care processes.

Background: Delayed transfer of patients from the emergency department to the intensive care unit is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Critically ill patients with delayed admission to the intensive care unit had higher in-hospital mortality and increased hospital length of stay. Objectives: We investigated the effects of an intensive care unit admission protocol controlled by intensivists on the emergency department length of stay among critically ill patients. Methods: We designed the intensive care unit admission protocol to reduce the emergency department length of stay in critically ill patients. Full-time intensivists determined intensive care unit admission priorities based on the severity of illness. Data were gathered from patients who were admitted from the emergency department to the intensive care unit between 1 April 2016 and 30 November 2016. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data and compared the emergency department length of stay between patients admitted from the emergency department to the intensive care unit before and after intervention. Results: We included 292 patients, 120 and 172 were admitted before and after application of the intensive care unit admission protocol, respectively. The demographic characteristics did not differ significantly between the groups. After intervention, the overall emergency department length of stay decreased significantly from 1045.5 (425.3–1665.3) min to 392.0 (279.3–686.8) min (p < 0.001). Intensive care unit length of stay also significantly decreased from 6.0 (4.0–11.8) days to 5.0 (3.0–10.0) days (p = 0.015). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that introduction of the intensive care unit admission protocol controlled by intensivists successfully decreased the emergency department length of stay and intensive care unit length of stay among critically ill patients at our institution.

Download Full-text

Use of Intravenous Vitamin C in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 Infection

Journal of Pharmacy Practice ◽

10.1177/08971900211015052 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 089719002110150

Author(s):

Matthew Li ◽

Tsung Han Ching ◽

Christopher Hipple ◽

Ricardo Lopez ◽

Asad Sahibzada ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Length Of Stay ◽

Vitamin C ◽

Hospital Mortality ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Critically Ill Patients ◽

Primary Objective ◽

Primary Study ◽

Protective Effects ◽

Icu Length Of Stay ◽

Intravenous Vitamin

Introduction The pathophysiology for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection is characterized by cytokine oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction. Intravenous (IV) vitamin C has been utilized as adjuvant therapy in critically ill patients with sepsis for its protective effects against reactive oxygen species and immunomodulatory effects. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of IV vitamin C in critically ill patients with COVID-19 infection. Methods Retrospective observational cohort study with propensity score matching of intensive care unit (ICU) patients who received 1.5 grams IV vitamin C every 6 hours for up to 4 days for COVID-19 infection. The primary study outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included vasopressor requirements in norepinephrine equivalents, ICU length of stay, and change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. Results Eight patients received IV vitamin C and were matched to 24 patients. Patients in the IV vitamin C group had higher rates of hospital mortality [7 (88%) vs. 19 (79%), P = 0.049]. There was no difference in the daily vasopressor requirement in the treatment group or between the 2 groups. The mean SOFA scores post-treatment was higher in the IV vitamin C group (12.4 ± 2.8 vs. 8.1 ± 3.5, P < 0.005). There was no difference in ICU length of stay between the treatment and control groups. Conclusion Adjunctive IV vitamin C for the management of COVID-19 infection in critically ill patients may not decrease the incidence of mortality, vasopressor requirements, SOFA scores, or ventilator settings.

Download Full-text

Characteristics of Critically-Ill Patients at Two Tertiary Care Hospitals in Sudan

Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal [SQUMJ] ◽

10.18295/squmj.2018.18.02.011 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 18 (2) ◽

pp. 190 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Hagir Sulieman ◽

Wael El-Mahdi ◽

Mohannad Awadelkareem ◽

Lama Nazer

Keyword(s):

Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Critical Care ◽

Intensive Care ◽

Length Of Stay ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Critically Ill Patients ◽

Tertiary Care ◽

Apache Ii ◽

The Mean ◽

Tertiary Care Hospitals

Objectives: Knowledge of intensive care unit (ICU) admission patterns and characteristics is necessary for the development of critical care services, particularly in low-resource settings. This study aimed to describe the characteristics of critically-ill patients admitted to ICUs in Sudan. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted between February and May 2017 in the ICUs of two government tertiary care hospitals inKhartoum, Sudan. A total of 100 consecutive adult patients admitted to the ICUs were included in the study. The patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics and Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) scores upon admission were recorded, as well as the reason for admission, presence of any underlying comorbidities, interventional requirements like mechanical ventilation or haemodialysis, length of stay in the ICU and patient outcome. Results: Of the sample, 58% were female and 42% were male. The mean age was 47.4 ± 18.3 years old. Upon admission, the mean APACHE II score was 14.2 ± 9.6. In total, 54% of the patients had no known underlying comorbidities. The most common reasons for ICU admission were neurological diseases (27%), sepsis or infectious diseases (19%) and postoperative management (12%). Mechanical ventilation and haemodialysis were required by 35% and 11% of the patients, respectively. The average length of stay was 10.0 ± 7.2 days and the mortality rate was 24%. Conclusion: Most of the patients admitted to the ICUs were middle-aged females with no known underlying comorbidities. Larger studies are necessary to provide a comprehensive understanding of the critical care needs of Sudanese hospitals.Keywords: Intensive Care Units; Patient Admission, trends; Critical Care Outcomes; Developing Countries; Sudan.

Download Full-text

Effect of emergency critical care nurses and emergency department boarding time on in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients

The American Journal of Emergency Medicine ◽

10.1016/j.ajem.2020.12.067 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 41 ◽

pp. 120-124

Author(s):

Jason Nesbitt ◽

Tsuyoshi Mitarai ◽

Garrett K. Chan ◽

Jennifer G. Wilson ◽

Kian Niknam ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Critical Care ◽

Hospital Mortality ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Critically Ill Patients ◽

Critical Care Nurses

Download Full-text

The simple observational critical care studies: estimations by students, nurses, and physicians of in-hospital and 6-month mortality

Critical Care ◽

10.1186/s13054-021-03809-w ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 25 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Eline G. M. Cox ◽

Marisa Onrust ◽

Madelon E. Vos ◽

Wolter Paans ◽

Willem Dieperink ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Intensive Care Unit ◽

Critical Care ◽

Intensive Care ◽

Hospital Mortality ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Critically Ill Patients ◽

Clinical Decision Making ◽

Operating Characteristics ◽

Tertiary Teaching ◽

Nurses And Physicians

Abstract Background Prognostic assessments of the mortality of critically ill patients are frequently performed in daily clinical practice and provide prognostic guidance in treatment decisions. In contrast to several sophisticated tools, prognostic estimations made by healthcare providers are always available and accessible, are performed daily, and might have an additive value to guide clinical decision-making. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of students’, nurses’, and physicians’ estimations and the association of their combined estimations with in-hospital mortality and 6-month follow-up. Methods The Simple Observational Critical Care Studies is a prospective observational single-center study in a tertiary teaching hospital in the Netherlands. All patients acutely admitted to the intensive care unit were included. Within 3 h of admission to the intensive care unit, a medical or nursing student, a nurse, and a physician independently predicted in-hospital and 6-month mortality. Logistic regression was used to assess the associations between predictions and the actual outcome; the area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) was calculated to estimate the discriminative accuracy of the students, nurses, and physicians. Results In 827 out of 1,010 patients, in-hospital mortality rates were predicted to be 11%, 15%, and 17% by medical students, nurses, and physicians, respectively. The estimations of students, nurses, and physicians were all associated with in-hospital mortality (OR 5.8, 95% CI [3.7, 9.2], OR 4.7, 95% CI [3.0, 7.3], and OR 7.7 95% CI [4.7, 12.8], respectively). Discriminative accuracy was moderate for all students, nurses, and physicians (between 0.58 and 0.68). When more estimations were of non-survival, the odds of non-survival increased (OR 2.4 95% CI [1.9, 3.1]) per additional estimate, AUROC 0.70 (0.65, 0.76). For 6-month mortality predictions, similar results were observed. Conclusions Based on the initial examination, students, nurses, and physicians can only moderately predict in-hospital and 6-month mortality in critically ill patients. Combined estimations led to more accurate predictions and may serve as an example of the benefit of multidisciplinary clinical care and future research efforts.

Download Full-text