Faculty Opinions recommendation of Increasing carbon storage in intact African tropical forests.

Author(s):  
Dennis Baldocchi
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Subashree Kothandaraman ◽  
Javid Ahmad Dar ◽  
Somaiah Sundarapandian ◽  
Selvadurai Dayanandan ◽  
Mohammed Latif Khan

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonky Indrajaya ◽  
Edwin van der Werf ◽  
Hans-Peter Weikard ◽  
Frits Mohren ◽  
Ekko van Ierland

Nature ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 457 (7232) ◽  
pp. 1003-1006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon L. Lewis ◽  
Gabriela Lopez-Gonzalez ◽  
Bonaventure Sonké ◽  
Kofi Affum-Baffoe ◽  
Timothy R. Baker ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Félicien Meunier ◽  
Michael Dietze ◽  
Manfredo di Porcia e Brugnera ◽  
Marcos Longo ◽  
Hans Verbeeck

<p>Despite their low contribution to forest carbon stocks, lianas (woody vines) play an important role in the carbon dynamics of tropical forests where they compete with free-standing plants for below- and above-ground resources. Doing so, they negatively impact individual tree growth, as well as the net productivity and the long-term carbon storage of the ecosystem.</p><p>However, lianas remain largely ignored in field-scale studies as well as modelling forecasts. Therefore, their exact impact on tropical forest biogeochemical cycles is very uncertain. In particular, it is unclear which resource (light, water) is the most competed for between growth forms and so is is the future impact of lianas on forests in a global climate change context in which brighter, drier and CO2-enriched conditions are expected in the Tropics.</p><p>To answer those burning questions, we incorporated for the very first time a plant functional type accounting for the lianescent growth form into a dynamic global vegetation model (ED2). We implemented several liana-specific processes in the modelling framework (climbing, resprouting, height limitation due to lack of self-supporting tissues etc.), and integrated liana-specific parameters according to data from multiple studies in order to account for significant differences of functional and structural traits between lianas and trees. These parameters included (but were not limited to) leaf biochemical and photosynthesis properties, stem hydraulic traits, root distribution, and allometric relationships.</p><p>Baseline runs successfully reproduced ecosystem gas exchange fluxes (GPP and latent heat), forest structural features (LAI, AGB), and several other benchmarking observations in multiple tropical sites characterized by different rainfall regimes and levels of liana abundance. In those simulations, lianas negatively reduced forest productivity and total carbon storage, by increasing tree mortality (+ 30% on average) and decreasing tree growth (-35%). The inclusion of lianas in the simulations reduced the forest net productivity by up to 0.5 tC ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>, which resulted in significantly reduced accumulated above‐ground biomass by up to 20 tC/ha in regrowth forests. The negative impact of lianas on carbon storage almost disappeared in wetter, old-growth forest sites. Model uncertainty analyses also revealed that water limitation was the dominant factor driving competition between trees and lianas, even in sites with a short dry season.</p><p>These two-key findings (higher impact in regrowth forests and water-dominated competition) are expected to lead to a reinforcement of the negative impact of lianas on forest productivity under future aggravated forest disturbance and warmer climate conditions. The modelling workflow also allowed to identify key liana traits (quantum efficiency, stomatal regulation parameters, allometric relationships) and processes (water use, respiration, climbing) driving the overall model uncertainty. They should be considered as priorities for future data acquisition and model development to improve predictions of liana-infested forest carbon dynamics.</p>


2004 ◽  
Vol 359 (1443) ◽  
pp. 463-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Q. Chambers ◽  
Whendee L. Silver

Atmospheric changes that may affect physiological and biogeochemical processes in old–growth tropical forests include: (i) rising atmospheric CO 2 concentration; (ii) an increase in land surface temperature; (iii) changes in precipitation and ecosystem moisture status; and (iv) altered disturbance regimes. Elevated CO 2 is likely to directly influence numerous leaf–level physiological processes, but whether these changes are ultimately reflected in altered ecosystem carbon storage is unclear. The net primary productivity (NPP) response of old–growth tropical forests to elevated CO 2 is unknown, but unlikely to exceed the maximum experimentally measured 25% increase in NPP with a doubling of atmospheric CO 2 from pre–industrial levels. In addition, evolutionary constraints exhibited by tropical plants adapted to low CO 2 levels during most of the Late Pleistocene, may result in little response to increased carbon availability. To set a maximum potential response for a Central Amazon forest, using an individual–tree–based carbon cycling model, a modelling experiment was performed constituting a 25% increase in tree growth rate, linked to the known and expected increase in atmospheric CO 2 . Results demonstrated a maximum carbon sequestration rate of ca . 0.2 Mg C per hectare per year (ha −1 yr −1 , where 1 ha = 10 4 m 2 ), and a sequestration rate of only 0.05 Mg C ha −1 yr −1 for an interval centred on calendar years 1980–2020. This low rate results from slow growing trees and the long residence time of carbon in woody tissues. By contrast, changes in disturbance frequency, precipitation patterns and other environmental factors can cause marked and relatively rapid shifts in ecosystem carbon storage. It is our view that observed changes in tropical forest inventory plots over the past few decades is more probably being driven by changes in disturbance or other environmental factors, than by a response to elevated CO 2 . Whether these observed changes in tropical forests are the beginning of long–term permanent shifts or a transient response is uncertain and remains an important research priority.


1995 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 329-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert B. McKane ◽  
Edward B. Rastetter ◽  
Jerry M. Melillo ◽  
Gaius R. Shaver ◽  
Charles S. Hopkinson ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (11) ◽  
pp. e1501105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Bello ◽  
Mauro Galetti ◽  
Marco A. Pizo ◽  
Luiz Fernando S. Magnago ◽  
Mariana F. Rocha ◽  
...  

Carbon storage is widely acknowledged as one of the most valuable forest ecosystem services. Deforestation, logging, fragmentation, fire, and climate change have significant effects on tropical carbon stocks; however, an elusive and yet undetected decrease in carbon storage may be due to defaunation of large seed dispersers. Many large tropical trees with sizeable contributions to carbon stock rely on large vertebrates for seed dispersal and regeneration, however many of these frugivores are threatened by hunting, illegal trade, and habitat loss. We used a large data set on tree species composition and abundance, seed, fruit, and carbon-related traits, and plant-animal interactions to estimate the loss of carbon storage capacity of tropical forests in defaunated scenarios. By simulating the local extinction of trees that depend on large frugivores in 31 Atlantic Forest communities, we found that defaunation has the potential to significantly erode carbon storage even when only a small proportion of large-seeded trees are extirpated. Although intergovernmental policies to reduce carbon emissions and reforestation programs have been mostly focused on deforestation, our results demonstrate that defaunation, and the loss of key ecological interactions, also poses a serious risk for the maintenance of tropical forest carbon storage.


2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 939-949 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra M. Durán ◽  
G. Arturo Sánchez-Azofeifa ◽  
Rodrigo S. Rios ◽  
Ernesto Gianoli

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document