Faculty Opinions recommendation of Measuring quality indicators in the operating room: cleaning and turnover time.

Author(s):  
Christoph Kindler ◽  
Peter Müller
2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 1239-1246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marli de Carvalho Jericó ◽  
Márcia Galan Perroca ◽  
Vivian Colombo da Penha

This exploratory-descriptive study was carried out in the Surgical Center Unit of a university hospital aiming to measure time spent with concurrent cleaning performed by the cleaning service and turnover time and also investigated potential associations between cleaning time and the surgery's magnitude and specialty, period of the day and the room's size. The sample consisted of 101 surgeries, computing cleaning time and 60 surgeries, computing turnover time. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze time and Pearson's correlation to study potential correlations. The time spent in concurrent cleaning was 7.1 minutes and turnover time was 35.6 minutes. No association between cleaning time and the other variables was found. These findings can support nurses in the efficient use of resources thereby speeding up the work process in the operating room.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 717-724
Author(s):  
Tara N. Cohen ◽  
Jennifer T. Anger ◽  
Kevin Shamash ◽  
Kate A. Cohen ◽  
Yosef Nasseri ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 61
Author(s):  
Dag Bratlid ◽  
Svein Petter Raknes

Background Most studies on operating room (OR) efficiency have focused on how local factors within the surgical facilities (micro level), such as turnover time, case duration and non-operative time, affects operating room efficiency. Few studies have analyzed how different strategies for organizing surgical services on the departmental or hospital level (macro level) might affect OR efficiency. Norwegian hospitals have organized their surgical services on the macro level along two different strategies. Most hospitals have separate facilities for out-patient surgery and in-patient surgery, often also geographically separated. Most hospitals also have specialty specific OR (orthopedics, gastroenterology, gynecology etc.), while in other hospitals different subspecialties share the same OR. This study was undertaken to analyze any effect of these different organizational strategies in relation to OR efficiency. Methods Data on organization of surgical services and operation volume for 2009 was gathered from eleven Norwegian university and larger county hospitals with a similar case mix. Total OR efficiency and OR efficiency during ordinary work hours were analyzed separately for out-patient and in-hospital surgery, including emergency operations. Calculation of OR during ordinary hours (8am-3pm) was based on 230 workdays per year, and included emergency operations. Results OR efficiency was 721 operations per OR per year with a range from 525 to 1049 and was not related to the different strategies for organizing these services. Furthermore, no correlation was found between OR efficiency and operation volume or number of OR. OR efficiency during ordinary hours and workdays was 3.6 operations per day for out-patient surgery and 1.8 for in-patient surgery including emergency operations. This was considerably less than standards used in planning surgical facilities in Norwegian hospitals. Conclusion OR efficiency is probably more related to organization of the surgical services on the micro level than to strategies for organizing these services on the macro level. The large variation in operating room efficiency in Norwegian hospitals indicates that many hospitals have a potential for improvement. The discrepancy between actual OR efficiency and standards used for planning of surgical facilities represents a challenge in future hospital planning.


2017 ◽  
Vol 225 (5) ◽  
pp. 573-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Troy A. Markel ◽  
Thomas Gormley ◽  
Damon Greeley ◽  
John Ostojic ◽  
Angie Wise ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 401-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulus M. Torkki ◽  
Riitta A. Marjamaa ◽  
Markus I. Torkki ◽  
Pentti E. Kallio ◽  
Olli A. Kirvelä

Background Mean turnover times and the time spent in the operating room (OR) can be reduced by concurrent induction of anesthesia. Previous studies of anesthesia induction outside the OR have concentrated either on anesthesia-controlled time or turnover time. The goal of this study was to investigate the impact of an induction room model on the whole surgical process, its phases and delays between the phases, and the number of cases performed during the 7-h working day. Methods A prospective analysis of OR times was conducted for 5 weeks with the traditional induction-in-the-OR model followed by 4 weeks with a new model: A team of two nurses and one anesthesiologist was added to one OR to perform parallel anesthesia induction in a separate induction room. The durations of phases of surgical process, number of completed cases between 7:45 am and 3:00 pm, and daily raw utilization of the OR were assessed. Results were compared to those measured before the intervention. Results The mean nonoperative time was reduced by 45.6%, whereas surgery time remained unchanged. The time savings contributed to the concurrent anesthesia induction and the cut down in delays between the phases. The new model allowed one additional case to be performed during the 7-h working day. Conclusions Anesthesia induction outside the OR can increase the number of surgical cases performed during a regular workday.


2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shawne Olson ◽  
Stephanie Jaross ◽  
Gail S. Rebischke-Smith ◽  
Frank Chivers ◽  
Stephanie K. Covel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document