Faculty Opinions recommendation of Comparison of mortality and morbidity in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure with preserved versus decreased left ventricular ejection fraction.

Author(s):  
Wilbert Aronow
Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maciej Tysarowski ◽  
Nigri Rafael ◽  
Hyoeun Kim ◽  
Emad Aziz

Introduction: There is conflicting data on the effect of digoxin on all-cause mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), especially in patients with heart failure (HF). Hypothesis: We hypothesized that in patients with AF, mortality rates associated with digoxin treatment are different among patients with HF and without HF. Methods: We conducted a cohort study of hospitalized patients with AF assessing the effects of digoxin on all-cause mortality. We divided patients into two groups: with and without HF. We performed Cox regression analysis to assess hazard ratios (HR) for all-cause mortality depending on digoxin treatment and used propensity score matching to adjust for differences in background characteristics between treatment groups. Results: Among 2179 consecutive patients, the median age was 73 ± 14 (table), 53% patient were male, 49% had HF, 19% were discharged on digoxin. Median left ventricular ejection fraction in the cohort was 60 (IQR 40-65). Among patients with HF, 35% had preserved, 18% had mid-range and 48% had reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. The mean follow-up time was 3 ± 2.1 years. After adjustment, in patients with HF, there was no statistically significant difference in mortality between the digoxin subgroups ( A , HR=1.01 [95% CI 0.76 to 1.35], p=0.92). In contrast, after adjustment, in patients without HF there was a statistically significant increased mortality in the digoxin subgroup ( B , HR=2.23, [95% CI 1.42 to 3.51], p<0.001). Conclusions: Digoxin use was associated with increased mortality in patients with AF and without concomitant HF. This suggests that clinicians should be careful in prescribing digoxin for rate control in AF, especially in patients without concomitant HF.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Tanaka ◽  
K Inoue ◽  
A Kobori ◽  
K Kaitani ◽  
T Morimoto ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Heart failure (HF) is the leading cause of death in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), and AF is an independent prognostic factor in HF patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for AF is effective to maintain sinus rhythm. Purpose We sought to clarify incidence of HF hospitalization and whether AF ablation outcome influenced incidence of HF hospitalization after the procedures in patients with preserved LVEF. Methods We conducted a large-scale, prospective, multicenter, observational study. A total of 4522 consecutive patients with normal LVEF (>/- 50%) who underwent an initial RFCA for AF in 26 centers were enrolled (average age, 64±10 years; non-paroxysmal AF, 33.7%). The median follow-up duration was 2.9 years. Results The 3-year cumulative incidence of AF recurrence after a single procedure was 40.3%. Hospitalization for HF was observed in 60 patients (1.3%) and was significantly higher in patients with AF recurrence than those without it (2.63% vs 0.44%, log-rank p<0.001). After adjustment by age ≥65 years, estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤60ml/min, history of HF, and female, all of which were statistically associated with a risk of HF hospitalization, AF recurrence after the index RFCA was an independent predictor of HF hospitalization (hazard ratio; 4.75, 95% confidence interval; 2.59–9.42, p<0.001). Conclusions Recurrence after RFCA for AF was a significant risk of HF hospitalization among AF patients with preserved LVEF. Acknowledgement/Funding This study was supported by the Research Institute for Production Development in Kyoto, Japan.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document