Faculty Opinions recommendation of Coffee consumption and coronary heart disease in men and women: a prospective cohort study.

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Stone
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Coffee Consumption ◽  
Men And Women

scholarly journals Prevalence, 12-Month Prognosis, and Clinical Management Need of Depression in Coronary Heart Disease Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 88 (5) ◽  
pp. 300-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stella L. Kuhlmann ◽  
Volker Arolt ◽  
Wilhelm Haverkamp ◽  
Peter Martus ◽  
Andreas Ströhle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Clinical Management ◽  
Prospective Cohort

scholarly journals Frequent nut consumption and risk of coronary heart disease in women: prospective cohort study

BMJ ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 317 (7169) ◽  
pp. 1341-1345 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. B Hu ◽  
M. J Stampfer ◽  
J. E Manson ◽  
E. B Rimm ◽  
G. A Colditz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort

Dietary magnesium intake and risk of incident coronary heart disease in men: A prospective cohort study

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 1602-1608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshihiro Kokubo ◽  
Isao Saito ◽  
Hiroyasu Iso ◽  
Kazumasa Yamagishi ◽  
Hiroshi Yatsuya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Incident Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Magnesium Intake ◽  
Dietary Magnesium

scholarly journals Diversity in citations to a single study: A citation context network analysis of how evidence from a prospective cohort study was cited

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-30
Author(s):  
Rhodri Ivor Leng
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Network Analysis ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Empirical Finding ◽  
Coffee Consumption ◽  
Consensus Conference ◽  
Cluster Membership ◽  
Citation Context

Abstract Between its origin in the 1950s and its endorsement by a consensus conference in 1984, the diet–heart hypothesis was the subject of intense controversy. Paul et al. (1963) is a highly cited prospective cohort study that reported findings inconvenient for this hypothesis, reporting no association between diet and heart disease; however, many other findings were also reported. By citation context and network analysis of 343 citing papers, I show how Paul et al. was cited in the 20 years after its publication. Generally, different findings were cited by different communities focusing on different risk factors; these communities were established by either research foci title terms or via cluster membership as established via modularity maximization. The most frequently cited findings were the significant associations between heart disease and serum cholesterol (n = 85), blood pressure (n = 57), and coffee consumption (n = 54). The lack of association between diet and heart disease was cited in just 41 papers. Yet, no single empirical finding was referred to in more than 25% of the citing papers. This raises questions about the value of inferring impact from citation counts alone and raises problems for studies using such counts to measure citation bias.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document