Faculty Opinions recommendation of Multisegmental A{delta}- and C-fiber input to neurons in lamina I and the lateral spinal nucleus.

Author(s):  
Anthony Pickering
2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 2384-2395 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Pinto ◽  
P. Szucs ◽  
D. Lima ◽  
B. V. Safronov

2018 ◽  
Vol 223 (5) ◽  
pp. 2377-2392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Gutierrez-Mecinas ◽  
Erika Polgár ◽  
Andrew M. Bell ◽  
Marine Herau ◽  
Andrew J. Todd

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Agashkov ◽  
V. Krotov ◽  
M. Krasniakova ◽  
D. Shevchuk ◽  
Y. Andrianov ◽  
...  

AbstractLamina I spino-parabrachial neurons (SPNs) receive peripheral nociceptive input, process it and transmit to the supraspinal centres. Although responses of SPNs to cutaneous receptive field stimulations have been intensively studied, the mechanisms of signal processing in these neurons are poorly understood. Therefore, we used an ex-vivo spinal cord preparation to examine synaptic and cellular mechanisms determining specific input-output characteristics of the neurons. The vast majority of the SPNs received a few direct nociceptive C-fiber inputs and generated one spike in response to saturating afferent stimulation, thus functioning as simple transducers of painful stimulus. However, 69% of afferent stimulation-induced action potentials in the entire SPN population originated from a small fraction (19%) of high-output neurons. These neurons received a larger number of direct Aδ- and C-fiber inputs, generated intrinsic bursts and efficiently integrated a local network activity via NMDA-receptor-dependent mechanisms. The high-output SPNs amplified and integrated the nociceptive input gradually encoding its intensity into the number of generated spikes. Thus, different mechanisms of signal processing allow lamina I SPNs to play distinct roles in nociception.


Pain ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 156 (10) ◽  
pp. 2042-2051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liliana L. Luz ◽  
Elisabete C. Fernandes ◽  
Miklos Sivado ◽  
Eva Kokai ◽  
Peter Szucs ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew G. Marshall ◽  
Manohar L Sharma ◽  
Kate Marley ◽  
Hakan Olausson ◽  
Francis P. McGlone

AbstractC-tactile afferents form a distinct channel that encodes pleasant tactile stimulation. Prevailing views indicate they project, as with other unmyelinated afferents, in lamina I-spinothalamic pathways. However, we found that spinothalamic ablation in humans, whilst profoundly impairing pain, temperature and itch, had no effect on pleasant touch perception. Only discriminative touch deficits were seen. These findings preclude privileged C-tactile-lamina I-spinothalamic projections and imply integrated hedonic and discriminative spinal processing from the body.


1988 ◽  
Vol 460 (2) ◽  
pp. 356-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth D. Cliffer ◽  
Gideon Urca ◽  
Robert P. Elde ◽  
Glenn J. Giesler

2002 ◽  
Vol 87 (4) ◽  
pp. 1889-1901 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Andrew ◽  
A. D. Craig

Noxious mechanical stimuli that are maintained for minutes produce a continuous sensation of pain in humans that augments during the stimulus. It has recently been shown with systematic force-controlled stimuli that, while all mechanically responsive nociceptors adapt to these stimuli, the basis for such pain can be ascribed to A-fiber rather than C-fiber nociceptors, based on distinctions in their respective response profiles and stimulus-response functions. The present experiments investigated whether similar distinctions could be made in subsets of nociceptive lamina I spinothalamic tract (STT) neurons using similar maintained stimuli. Twenty-eight lamina I STT neurons in the lumbosacral dorsal horn of barbiturate-anesthetized cats were tested with noxious mechanical stimuli applied with a probe of 0.1 mm2 contact area at forces of 25, 50, and 100 g for 2 min. The neurons were classified as nociceptive-specific (NS, n = 14) or polymodal nociceptive (HPC, n = 14) based on their responses to quantitative thermal stimuli. The NS neurons had greater responses and showed less adaptation than the HPC neurons in response to these stimuli, and they encoded stimulus intensity better. Comparison of the normalized response profiles of all 28 nociceptive lamina I STT neurons, independent of cell classification, revealed 2 subgroups that differed significantly: “Maintained” cells with responses that remained above 50% of the initial peak rate during stimulation and “Adapting” cells with responses that quickly declined to <50%. The Maintained neurons encoded the intensity of the mechanical stimuli better than the Adapting neurons, based on ratiometric functions. A k-means cluster analysis of all 28 cells distinguished the identical two subgroups. These categories corresponded closely to the NS and HPC categories: Maintained cells were mostly NS neurons (10 NS, 3 HPC), and Adapting cells were mostly HPC neurons (4 NS, 11 HPC). Thus the present data are consistent with the distinctions between A-fiber and C-fiber nociceptors observed previously, because A-fiber nociceptors are the predominant input to NS lamina I STT neurons and C-fiber nociceptors are the predominant input to HPC neurons. These findings support the view that NS, but perhaps not HPC, lamina I STT neurons have a role in the pain caused by maintained mechanical stimuli and contribute to the sensations of “first” pain and “sharpness.” Nonetheless, none of the units studied showed increasing responses during the stimuli, suggesting a role for other ascending neurons or forebrain integration in the augmenting pain produced by maintained mechanical stimulation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document