Faculty Opinions recommendation of Long-term (6 and 12 months) follow-up of two prospective, randomized, controlled phase III trials of photodynamic therapy with BF-200 ALA and methyl aminolaevulinate for the treatment of actinic keratosis.

Author(s):  
Melvin Chiu
2017 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. s117
Author(s):  
T Dirschka ◽  
U Reinhold ◽  
M Foguet ◽  
B Novak ◽  
B Schmitz ◽  
...  

Abstract Not Available Study supported by Biofrontera.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S1-S1
Author(s):  
William L Hickerson ◽  
Jeremy Goverman ◽  
Sigrid A Blome-Eberwein ◽  
Adam Singer ◽  
Lucy Wibbenmeyer

Abstract Introduction Bromelain Based Debridement (BBD) of deep burns is approved for use in Europe, Argentina, Russia, South Korea, Peru and Israel. In the United States it is an investigational product and currently there are 2 multicenter RCTs (DETECT – adults, CIDS – children). Patient enrollment in the DETECT adult trial has been completed. The aim of this abstract is to present the acute stage top line results of the DETECT trial. Methods 175 adult patients suffering from deep burns were included in a phase III multicenter, multinational, randomized, controlled, assessor blinded trial. Patients were randomized to 3 arms – BBD, Standard of Care (SOC), or Gel vehicle (Placebo control) in a 3:3:1 ratio (75 BBD, 75 SOC, 25 Gel). The primary endpoint was the incidence of complete eschar removal (BBD vs Gel). Additional acute stage endpoints included the time to complete eschar removal, incidence of surgical eschar removal and eschar removal associated blood loss.Time to complete wound closure (BBD vs SOC) was assessed as a safety endpoint. Following the acute stage, a long-term follow up period of 2 years is being conducted. Results Patient demographics and wound baseline characteristics were comparable across study arms.The incidence of complete eschar removal was significantly higher for BBD vs Gel patients (93.3% vs 4%, p< 0.0001). The incidence of surgical eschar removal was significantly lower for BBD vs SOC patients (4% vs 72%, p< 0.0001). The median time to complete eschar removal was significantly shorter for BBD vs SOC patients (1 day vs 3.8 days, p< 0.0001). Calculated eschar removal associated blood loss was significantly lower for BBD vs SOC patients (14ml vs 815ml, p< 0.0001). The median time to complete wound closure was similar for BBD and SOC patients (27 and 28 days). The overall safety profile of BBD treated patients was good and consistent with the safety data known from previous studies.The results of the long term follow up period are not yet available. Conclusions The acute stage results of this robust phase III RCT demonstrate the safety and efficacy of BBD and are in line with previous trial results. Applicability of Research to Practice The results of this trial may help pave the way for US approval of BBD.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8519-8519
Author(s):  
B. Barlogie ◽  
M. Attal ◽  
J. Crowley ◽  
J. Harousseau

8519 Background: Clinical trial outcomes are usually published when statistical protocol objectives have been met, with short median follow-up not exceeding 5 years. Due to treatment innovations, MM survival beyond 10 years has become more common but formal long-term results are seldom reported. Methods: IFM, SWOG and ARK provide an update of their major trials. IFM-90: 1 AT v standard therapy (STD), IFM-94: 2 v 1 AT, IFM-9902: 2AT ± THAL, IFM-9904: 2AT for high-risk MM; SWOG-9321: 1 AT v STD; TT1: 2 AT with interferon, TT2: 2AT ± THAL, TT3: 2AT + THAL + bortezomib. Results: OS clustered in 3 groups with superior outcomes for TT3/TT2/IFM-99 v TT1 v IFM-94/ IFM-90/SWOG-9321 with 5/10/15-yr estimates of 70%/50%/TE v 57%/35%/20% v 43%/25%/15% (p<0.0001). EFS also clustered in 3 groups with superior outcomes for TT3 v TT2 v remainder with estimates of 71%/TE/TE v 50%/35%/TE v 27%/ 15%/10% (p<0.0001). Among phase III trials, added THAL in TT2 increased 10-yr OS/EFS from 40%/25% to 60%/40% (p=0.04/p=0.0005); 10-yr OS was 30% v 8% with 1 v 0 AT in IFM-90 (p=0.005), 31% v 21% with 2 AT v 1 AT in IFM-94 (p=0.08), and 20% for both arms of S9321. On multivariate analysis involving 2962 patients, OS was adversely affected by B2M >=3.5mg/L (p<0.001), LDH >=ULN (p<0.001), hemoglobin <10g/dL (p=0.001) and albumin <3.5g/dL (p=0.02). 2AT (65%) and THAL (21%) both contributed independently to superior OS (p<0.001, p=0.002); among individual trials, IFM-9902 (19%) and TT2/TT3 (33%) both improved OS significantly (both p<0.001). For each of the 3 major OS clusters, 228 patients could be matched on B2M, LDH, hemoglobin and albumin, with 10-yr OS/EFS estimates of 65%/30% for the TT3/TT2/IFM-9902 group significantly exceeding 30%/15% each for the other 2 groups (p=0.001/p=0.001). Conclusions: A 15-yr EFS plateau of 10% with older trials and superior 10-yr EFS/OS estimates of 50%/35% with recent studies emphasize that cure should be a realistic trial objective in contemporary MM therapy, requiring however very long-term follow-up beyond 15 years. [Table: see text]


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 412-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna Weber ◽  
Robert Knight ◽  
Christine Chen ◽  
Andrew Spencer ◽  
Zhinuan Yu ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Lenalidomide (Len), an analog of thalidomide (Thal) is a novel, oral, immunomodulatory agent that is effective against multiple myeloma (MM). In 2 prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trials, Len with dexamethasone (Dex) induced a significantly higher overall response (OR) rate and complete remission (CR) rate, as well as longer time-to-progression (TTP) in comparison with Dex alone. Here, we investigate the long-term overall survival (OS) with Len/Dex. Methods: We evaluated the pooled results from both randomized trials (MM-009, MM-010) of 704 patients who had relapsed or refractory MM, without prior resistance to Dex, who received either Len (25 mg daily for 3 weeks every 4 weeks), or placebo. Dex was given at 40 mg on days 1–4, 9–12, 17–20 every 4 weeks for 4 cycles. From cycle 5 onwards, Dex was given at 40 mg on days 1–4 only. Response rate and TTP are based on data obtained before unblinding (June 2005 [MM-009] and August 2005 [MM-010]). Follow-up data on OS were obtained up to January 2007. Forty-seven percent of patients who received placebo/Dex crossed over to receive Len +/− Dex. Results: Of 704 patients, 353 were treated with Len/Dex and 351 with Dex alone. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between patients receiving Len/Dex and those receiving Dex alone. Median TTP, OR, and CR were significantly improved in patients treated with Len/Dex compared with Dex alone (Table). Of patients who progressed on Dex alone prior to unblinding, or were found to be receiving Dex alone after unblinding, 47% crossed over to Len +/− Dex. Despite these patients crossing over to Len +/− Dex at progression or at the time of unblinding, the OS was significantly improved in patients treated with Len/Dex compared with Dex alone (hazard ratio 1.295; 95% confidence interval 1.040–1.614; p=0.02). Median OS in the Len/Dex group was 35 months and 31 in the Dex alone group (p<0.05). Median OS was also significantly longer with Len/Dex compared with Dex alone in patients with more than 1 prior therapy (32.4 months versus 27.3 months, p<0.05). Similar median OS was observed with Len/Dex and Dex alone in patients with 1 prior therapy (median OS not yet reached and 35.3 months, p=0.24). Conclusion: With increased follow-up and despite cross-over, patients treated first with Len/Dex had significantly improved OS compared with those treated with Dex alone. Len/Dex (n=353) Dex alone (n=351) P value OR, % 60.6 21.9 <0.001 CR, % 15.0 2.0 <0.001 Median TTP, months 11.2 4.7 <0.001 Median OS, months 35.0 31.0 <0.05 Median OS in patients with 1 prior treatment, months not yet reached 35.3 0.24 Median OS in patients with >1 prior treatment, months 32.4 27.3 <0.05


Lung Cancer ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. S151-S159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Pierre Pignon ◽  
Rodrigo Arriagada

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document