Faculty Opinions recommendation of Clinical outcomes and cardiovascular responses to exercise training in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Author(s):  
Michael Kapiloff
Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gudrun Dieberg ◽  
Hashbullah Ismail ◽  
Francesco Giallauria ◽  
Neil A Smart

Background: Exercise training induces physical adaptations for heart failure patients with systolic dysfunction but less is known about those patients with preserved ejection fraction. Objectives: To establish if exercise training produces changes in peak VO 2 and related measures, quality of life, general health and diastolic function in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods: We conducted a MEDLINE search (1985 to March 2014), for exercise based rehabilitation trials in heart failure, using search terms ‘exercise training, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, heart failure with normal ejection fraction, peak VO 2 and diastolic heart dysfunction’. Seven intervention studies were included providing a total of 144 exercising subjects and 114 control subjects, a total of 258 participants. Results: Peak VO 2 increased by a mean difference (MD) 2.13 ml.kg -1 .min -1 (95% C.I. 1.54 to 2.71, p<0.00001) in exercise training versus sedentary control, equating to a 17% improvement from baseline. The corresponding data for V E /VCO 2 slope MD 0.85 ml.kg -1 .min -1 (95% C.I. 0.05 to 1.65, p=0.04); maximum heart rate MD 5.60 bpm (95% C.I. 3.95 to 7.25, p<0.00001); and 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) MD 32.1m (95% C.I. 17.2 to 47.1, p<0.0001); diastolic function; E/A ratio MD 0.07 (95% C.I. 0.02 to 0.12, p=0.005); E/E’ ratio MD -2.31 (95% C.I. -3.44 to -1.19, p<0.0001); Deceleration time (D T ) MD -13.2 msec (95% C.I. -19.8 to -6.5, p=0.0001); Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) MD -6.50 (95% C.I. -9.47 to -3.53, p<0.0001); Short Form (36) Health Survey MD 15.6 (95% C.I. 7.4 to 23.8, p=0.0002). In 3,744 hours patient-hours of training, not one death was directly attributable to exercise. Conclusions: Exercise training appears to effect several health-related improvements in people with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.


2015 ◽  
Vol 119 (6) ◽  
pp. 726-733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gudrun Dieberg ◽  
Hashbullah Ismail ◽  
Francesco Giallauria ◽  
Neil A. Smart

Exercise training induces physical adaptations for heart failure patients with systolic dysfunction, but less is known about those patients with preserved ejection fraction. To establish whether exercise training produces changes in peak V̇o2 and related measures, quality of life, general health, and diastolic function in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction. We conducted a MEDLINE search (1985 to October 10, 2014), for exercise-based rehabilitation trials in heart failure, using search terms “exercise training, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, heart failure with normal ejection fraction, peak V̇o2, and diastolic heart dysfunction”. Seven intervention studies were included providing a total of 144 exercising subjects and 114 control subjects, a total of 258 participants. Peak V̇o2 increased by a mean difference (MD) 2.13 ml·kg−1·min−1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.54 to 2.71, P < 0.00001] in exercise training vs. sedentary control, equating to a 17% improvement from baseline. The corresponding data are provided for the following exercise test variables: V̇e/V̇co2 slope, MD 0.85 ml·kg−1·min−1 (95% CI 0.05 to 1.65, P = 0.04); maximum heart rate, MD 5.60 beats per minute (95% CI 3.95 to 7.25, P < 0.00001); Six-Minute Walk Test, MD 32.1 m (95% CI 17.2 to 47.1, P < 0.0001); and indices of diastolic function: E/A ratio, MD 0.07 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.12, P = 0.005); E/E′ ratio MD −2.31 (95% CI −3.44 to −1.19, P < 0.0001); deceleration time (DT), MD −13.2 ms (95% CI −19.8 to −6.5, P = 0.0001); and quality of life: Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, MD −6.50 (95% CI −9.47 to −3.53, P < 0.0001); and short form-36 health survey (physical dimension), MD 15.6 (95% CI 7.4 to 23.8, P = 0.0002). In 3,744 h patient-hours of training, not one death was directly attributable to exercise. Exercise training appears to effect several health-related improvements in people with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.


2016 ◽  
Vol 86 (1-2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erick Chan ◽  
Francesco Giallauria ◽  
Carlo Vigorito ◽  
Neil A. Smart

<p>Exercise training induces physical adaptations for heart failure patients with systolic dysfunction but less is known about those patients with preserved ejection fraction. This study's aims were to establish if exercise training produces changes in peak VO<sub>2</sub> and related measures, quality of life, general health and diastolic function in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We conducted a MEDLINE search (1985 to September 1, 2015), for exercise based rehabilitation trials in heart failure, using search terms ‘exercise training, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, heart failure with  normal ejection fraction, peak VO<sub>2</sub> and diastolic heart dysfunction’. Eight intervention studies were included providing a total of 174 exercising subjects and 143 control subjects, a total of 317 participants. Peak VO<sub>2</sub> increased by a mean difference (MD) 2.08 mL kg<sup>-1 </sup>min<sup>-1</sup> (95% C.I. 1.51 to 2.65, p&lt;0.00001) in exercise training versus sedentary control, equating to a 17% improvement from baseline. V<sub>E</sub>/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope was not different between groups, MD -3.10 mL kg<sup>-1 </sup>min<sup>-1</sup> (95% C.I. -7.47 to 1.27, p=0.16); maximum heart rate was significantly increased in exercise groups, MD 3.46 bpm (95% C.I. 2.41 to 4.51, p&lt;0.00001); 6 Minute Walk Distance (6MWT) MD 32.1m (95% C.I. 17.2 to 47.1, p&lt;0.0001); diastolic  function; the ratio of early to late filling (E/A ratio) was improved after exercise training MD 0.07 (95% C.I. 0.02 to 0.12, p=0.006); as was filling pressure E/E’ ratio MD -2.38 (95% C.I. -3.47 to -1.28, p&lt;0.0001); Deceleration time (D<sub>T</sub>) MD -13.2 msec (95% C.I. -19.8 to -6.5, p=0.0001); Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) MD -6.77 (95% C.I. -9.70 to -3.84, p&lt;0.00001); Short Form (36) Health Survey MD 11.38 (95% C.I. 5.28 to 17.48, p=0.0003).  In 3222 patient-hours of training, not a single death was directly attributable to exercise. Exercise training appears to effect several health-related improvements in people with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.</p>


Author(s):  
Monil Majmundar ◽  
Rajkumar Doshi ◽  
Harshvardhan Zala ◽  
Palak Shah ◽  
Devina Adalja ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
O.M Aldaas ◽  
F Lupercio ◽  
C.L Malladi ◽  
P.S Mylavarapu ◽  
D Darden ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Catheter ablation improves clinical outcomes in symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, the role of catheter ablation in HF patients with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is less clear. Purpose To determine the efficacy of catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF relative to those with HFrEF. Methods We performed an extensive literature search and systematic review of studies that compared AF recurrence at one year after catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF versus those with HFrEF. Risk ratio (RR) 95% confidence intervals were measured using the Mantel-Haenszel method for dichotomous variables, where a RR&lt;1.0 favors the HFpEF group. Results Four studies with a total of 563 patients were included, of which 312 had HFpEF and 251 had HFrEF. All patients included were undergoing first time catheter ablation of AF. Patients with HFpEF experienced similar recurrence of AF one year after ablation on or off antiarrhythmic drugs compared to those with HFrEF (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.69–1.10, p=0.24), as shown in Figure 1. Recurrence of AF was assessed with electrocardiography, Holter monitoring, and/or event monitoring at scheduled follow-up visits and final follow-up. Conclusion Based on the results of this meta-analysis, catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF appears as efficacious in maintaining sinus rhythm as in those with HFrEF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document