Faculty Opinions recommendation of Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on the symptom dimensions of schizophrenia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vijay Mittal
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Symptom Dimensions ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Interventions to Reduce Alcohol Harms in Low and Middle Income Countries: a Systematic Review and Meta Analysis

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joao Ricardo Nickenig Vissoci
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Alcohol Use ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
World Health ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Brief Motivational Intervention ◽  
Randomized Controlled

BackgroundHarmful alcohol use leads to a large burden of disease and disability which disportionately impacts LMICs. The World Health Organization and the Lancet have issued calls for this burden to be addressed, but issues remain, primarily due to gaps in information. While a variety of interventions have been shown to be effective at reducing alcohol use in HICs, their efficacy in LMICs have yet to be assessed. This systematic review describes the current published literature on alcohol interventions in LMICs and conducts a meta analysis of clinical trials evaluating interventions to reduce alcohol use and harms in LMICs.MethodsIn accordance with PRISMA guidelines we searched the electronic databases Pubmed, EMBASE, Scopus,Web of Science, Cochrane, and Psych Info. Articles were eligible if they evaluated an intervention targeting alcohol-related harm in LMICs. After a reference and citation analysis, we conducted a quality assessment per PRISMA protocol. A meta-analysis was performed on the 39 randomized controlled trials that evaluated an alcohol-related outcome.ResultsOf the 3,801 articles from the literature search, 87 articles from 25 LMICs fit the eligibility and inclusion criteria. Of these studies, 39 randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. Nine of these studies focused specifically on medication, while the others focused on brief motivational intervention, brain stimulation, AUDIT-based brief interventions, WHO ASSIST-based interventions, group based education, basic screening and interventions, brief psychological or counseling, dyadic relapse prevention, group counseling, CBT, motivational + PTSD based interview, and health promotion/awareness. Conclusion Issues in determining feasible options specific to LMICs arise from unstandardized interventions, unequal geographic distribution of intervention implementation, and uncertain effectiveness over time. Current research shows that brain stimulation, psychotherapy, and brief motivational interviews have the potential to be effective in LMIC settings, but further feasibility testing and efforts to standardize results are necessary to accurately assess their effectiveness.

Deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2014 ◽  
Vol 261 (11) ◽  
pp. 2051-2060 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Perestelo-Pérez ◽  
A. Rivero-Santana ◽  
J. Pérez-Ramos ◽  
P. Serrano-Pérez ◽  
J. Panetta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Deep Brain

scholarly journals Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation on Dysphagia after Stroke

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Lingling Li ◽  
Hailiang Huang ◽  
Yuqi Jia ◽  
Ying Yu ◽  
Zhiyao Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Standard Mean Difference ◽  
Swallowing Dysfunction

Background. Dysphagia is a common sequelae after stroke. Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is a tool that has been used in the rehabilitation process to modify cortical excitability and improve dysphagia. Objective. To systematically evaluate the effect of NIBS on dysphagia after stroke and compare the effects of two different NIBS. Methods. Randomized controlled trials about the effect of NIBS on dysphagia after stroke were retrieved from databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP, and CBM, from inception to June 2021. The quality of the trials was assessed, and the data were extracted according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. A statistical analysis was carried out using RevMan 5.3 and ADDIS 1.16.8. The effect size was evaluated by using the standardized mean difference (SMD) and a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results. Ultimately, 18 studies involving 738 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that NIBS could improve the dysphagia outcome and severity scale (DOSS) score (standard mean difference SMD = 1.44 , 95% CI 0.80 to 2.08, P < 0.05 ) and the water swallow test score ( SMD = 6.23 , 95% CI 5.44 to 7.03, P < 0.05 ). NIBS could reduce the standardized swallowing assessment (SSA) score ( SMD = − 1.04 , 95% CI -1.50 to -0.58, P < 0.05 ), the penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) score ( SMD = − 0.85 , 95% CI -1.33 to -0.36, P < 0.05 ), and the functional dysphagia scale score ( SMD = − 1.05 , 95% CI -1.48 to -0.62, P < 0.05 ). Network meta-analysis showed that the best probabilistic ranking of the effects of two different NIBS on the DOSS score is rTMS   P = 0.52 > tDCS   P = 0.48 , the best probabilistic ranking of the SSA score is rTMS   P = 0.72 > tDCS   P = 0.28 , and the best probabilistic ranking of the PAS score is rTMS   P = 0.68 > tDCS   P = 0.32 . Conclusion. Existing evidence showed that NIBS could improve swallowing dysfunction and reduce the occurrence of aspiration after stroke, and that rTMS is better than tDCS. Limited by the number of included studies, more large-sample, multicenter, double-blind, high-quality clinical randomized controlled trials are still needed in the future to further confirm the results of this research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document