Faculty Opinions recommendation of Propranolol Versus Metoprolol for Treatment of Electrical Storm in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator.

Author(s):  
Wilbert Aronow
Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Takahashi ◽  
Tsuyoshi Shiga ◽  
Daigo Yagishita ◽  
Keisuke Futagawa ◽  
Naoki Serizawa ◽  
...  

Purpose: Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) prevents sudden cardiac death in high risk patients with heart failure (HF). Worsening renal function (WRF) is associated with mortality in patients with myocardial infarction or HF, but its effect on lethal arrhythmia is unknown. We evaluated the influence of WRF on the occurrence of arrhythmic events in patients with nonischemic HF and ICD. Methods: A total of 286 nonischemic HF patients who underwent ICD implantation between 1990 and 2007 were studied. Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease. Renal dysfunction was defined as eGFR <60mL/min/1.73m 2 and WRF was defined as 15mL/min/1.73m 2 per year. Differences in arrhythmia recurrences according to the eGFR and WRF were compared by Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Results: During a mean follow-up time of 2.2+/−1.0 years, 94 (33%) of 286 patients (mean age; 57+/−15 years, 72% male) experienced appropriate ICD shock therapy. There was a significantly higher cumulative rate of appropriate ICD shock therapy (p<0.05) and electrical storm (p<0.05) in patients with renal dysfunction than others. The patients with renal dysfunction at baseline experience WRF more frequently than other patients (53% vs. 23%, respectively, p<0.01). After correcting for age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), indication for ICD implantation, and use of beta-blockers in a Cox regression model, WRF was still an independent predictor of the time to first appropriate shock (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.32–3.69, p<0.05) and electrical storm (HR 2.22, 95% CI 1.19 – 4.13, p<0.05). The result of subgroup analysis of 147 patients with low LVEF (LVEF<35%) indicated that the patients with WRF experienced electrical storms more frequently (p<0.05). Conclusion: WRF is associated with increased rate of arrhythmic event in nonischemic HF patients. Especially, those patients with low LVEF and WRF experience more frequent ICD shocks.


2008 ◽  
Vol 156 (5) ◽  
pp. 847-854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurizio Gasparini ◽  
Maurizio Lunati ◽  
Maurizio Landolina ◽  
Massimo Santini ◽  
Luigi Padeletti ◽  
...  

Cytokine ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 166-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Streitner ◽  
Juergen Kuschyk ◽  
Christian Veltmann ◽  
Desiree Ratay ◽  
Nina Schoene ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
pp. 722-722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Afef Ben Halima ◽  
Zied Ibn Elhadj ◽  
Marouane Boukhris ◽  
Farouk Abcha ◽  
Salem Kachboura

Heart Rhythm ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 1987-1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Guerra ◽  
Pietro Palmisano ◽  
Gabriele DellEra ◽  
Matteo Ziacchi ◽  
Ernesto Ammendola ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 478-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Astrid A Hendriks ◽  
Tamas Szili-Torok

Electrical storm is characterised by a state of severe electrical instability that occurs in a rare combination of circumstances, and may lead to multiple implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks and haemodynamic instability, and possible death. The main goal of treating electrical storm is to eliminate the trigger and modify the substrate of the arrhythmia. The aim of this educational review is to provide information for a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms and therefore help to improve the treatment of electrical storm patients.


2006 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 389-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arash Arya ◽  
Majid Haghjoo ◽  
Mohammad Reza Dehghani ◽  
Amir Farjam Fazelifar ◽  
Mohammad-Hosein Nikoo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document