Faculty Opinions recommendation of Association of cardiovascular outcomes with masked hypertension defined by home blood pressure monitoring in a japanese general practice population.

Author(s):  
Wilbert Aronow
Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Virginia R Nuckols ◽  
Amy K Stroud ◽  
Debra Brandt ◽  
Mark K Santillan ◽  
Donna A Santillan ◽  
...  

Introduction: One-third of women with a history of preeclampsia (hxPE), a hypertensive pregnancy disorder, develop chronic hypertension (HTN) within five years postpartum. Twenty-four hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) shows that 12% of women with hxPE have ‘masked’ HTN. Masked HTN is undetected in routine clinical assessment but is associated with elevated cardiovascular disease risk. ABPM (gold-standard) or home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is needed to identify masked HTN. HBPM is a well-tolerated, inexpensive alternative to ABPM. However, the ability of HBPM to detect masked postpartum HTN using new AHA/ACC HTN guidelines is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare ABPM and HBPM in the identification of masked and sustained HTN among young women with hxPE and healthy pregnancy (HP) controls 1-3 years postpartum. Methods: Women with hxPE (N=22; age 33 ± 5 yrs) and HP controls (N=26; age 34 ± 4 yrs) were assessed 18 ± 6 months postpartum. Seated office blood pressure (BP) was collected with an automated brachial cuff and averaged over three trials. ABPM (Mobil-o-graph) was conducted with a portable, automated brachial cuff and averaged over 38 ± 2 awake and asleep BP recordings. Participants completed HBPM (Microlife) morning and evening for seven consecutive days. BP thresholds for HTN were determined according to 2017 AHA/ACC clinical guidelines. Results: HTN was more prevalent among women with hxPE compared with HP assessed by office BP (59 vs. 15 %, P=0.002) and ABPM (68 vs. 31 %, P=0.01) but not HBPM (41 vs 19 %, P=0.10). The prevalence of masked HTN did not differ between women with hxPE and HP (14 vs. 19%, P=0.71) assessed by ABPM. In the entire cohort, HBPM detected 50% of masked HTN cases identified by ABPM. HBPM agreed with ABPM on HTN status (κ = 0.49, P=0.002). HBPM and ABPM detected uncontrolled HTN in three of four women with hxPE prescribed anti-hypertensive medication. Conclusion: HxPE is associated with a higher prevalence of HTN 1-3 yrs postpartum compared with controls, but the prevalence of masked HTN did not differ. ABPM and HBPM showed concordant classification of HTN using current BP guidelines. These findings indicate that HBPM may be a valuable pre-screening tool for early identification and management of HTN postpartum.


2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1870-1872

Hypertension is a powerful modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease. The prevalence of hypertension in Thailand is increasing progressively. Patients with hypertension are usually asymptomatic, and thus proper blood pressure measurement is required to diagnose and assess the blood pressure control. Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is recognized as a useful tool in hypertension management and is recommended by many organizations, including the Thai Hypertension Society. The proven benefits of HBPM beyond the usual clinic measurement is that it allowed detection of white-coat hypertension and masked hypertension, better prediction of cardiovascular events, better assessment of the status of blood pressure control, and improved treatment compliance. Despite these benefits, the use of HBPM has remained low in many countries. The Asia HBPM Survey is a collaborative study of participants from 11 countries in Asia. The present study aimed to investigate physicians’ rationale, challenge, and attitudes toward the use of HBPM for hypertensive patients. Herein, the authors report Thai physicians’ responses in the Asia HBPM Survey.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 1745-1747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Audes D. M. Feitosa ◽  
Marco A. Mota‐Gomes ◽  
Roberto D. Miranda ◽  
Weimar S. Barroso ◽  
Eduardo C. D. Barbosa ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelsey B Bryant ◽  
Matthew B Green ◽  
Ian M Kronish ◽  
Yiyi Zhang ◽  
James Sheppard ◽  
...  

Introduction: Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is an option recommended by the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines to confirm a hypertension diagnosis or identify masked hypertension. Using clinic BP and patient characteristics, the Predicting Out-of-Office BP in the Clinic (PROOF-BP) algorithm can be used to guide HBPM decisions. It is unknown how existing patient use and physician recommendations for HBPM align with current screening recommendations. Methods: We used the 2009-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to identify US adults aged ≥20 years without hypertension or antihypertensive medication use. We identified those who would have been recommended to undergo HBPM by ACC/AHA guidelines as those with a mean BP 120-159/<100 mm Hg and by the PROOF-BP algorithm as those with a predicted out-of-office BP 125-134/75-84 mm Hg. We required individuals to have complete data needed for the PROOF-BP algorithm (demographics, BP, smoking, alcohol use, kidney disease) and reported HBPM actual/recommended use. All analyses were weighted to be representative of the US population. Results: We included 7,185 NHANES adults without hypertension; weighted mean (SE) age was 41.5 (0.3) years, 48% female, and mean BP 117.0 (0.3)/70.4 (0.3) mm Hg. Overall, 50.3% of adults without hypertension would have been recommended to undergo HBPM by ACC/AHA guidelines and 29.7% by PROOF-BP ( Table ). Only 13.3% of those recommended HBPM by ACC/AHA guidelines used or were told to use HBPM, compared to 11.5% of those not recommended screening. Similar results were seen among those recommended HBPM by PROOF-BP ( Table ). Conclusions: Our analysis shows that prior to 2017 guidelines, a substantial proportion of US adults may have had their hypertensive status misclassified due to a lack of HBPM or undergo unnecessary monitoring. These findings suggest an opportunity for clinicians and health systems to more clearly target HBPM to those who need it given guidelines currently in use.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document