Faculty Opinions recommendation of Cell competition during reprogramming gives rise to dominant clones.

Author(s):  
Jun Takahashi
Keyword(s):  
2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 307-314
Author(s):  
Manish Patel ◽  
Bhavesh Antala ◽  
Neeta Shrivastava
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 518
Author(s):  
Adam James Ferrari ◽  
Ronny Drapkin ◽  
Rajan Gogna

Cell competition (CC) is a feature that allows tumor cells to outcompete and eliminate adjacent cells that are deemed less fit. Studies of CC, first described in Drosophila melanogaster, reveal a diversity of underlying mechanisms. In this review, we will discuss three recent studies that expand our understanding of the molecular features governing CC. In particular, we will focus on a molecular fitness fingerprint, oncogenic pathways, and the importance of cell junction stability. A fitness fingerprint, mediated by flower (hFWE) protein isoforms, dictates that cells expressing the flower-win isoforms will outcompete adjacent flower-loss-expressing cells. The impact of the flower protein isoforms is seen in cancer progression and may have diagnostic potential. The yes-associated protein (YAP) and TAZ transcription factors, central mediators of the oncogenic Hippo pathway, elevate peritumoral fitness thereby protecting against tumor progression and provide a suppressive barrier. Similarly, COL17A1 is a key component in hemidesmosome stability, and its expression in epidermal stem cells contributes to fitness competition and aging characteristics. The contributions of these pathways to disease development and progression will help define how CC is hijacked to favor cancer growth. Understanding these features will also help frame the diagnostic and therapeutic possibilities that may place CC in the crosshairs of cancer therapeutics.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Motoyuki Ogawa ◽  
Yosuke Kawarazaki ◽  
Yasuyuki Fujita ◽  
Isao Naguro ◽  
Hidenori Ichijo
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (4-5-6) ◽  
pp. 299-318
Author(s):  
Carmen M.A. Coelho

The regulation of growth and the determination of organ-size in animals is an area of research that has received much attention during the past two and a half decades. Classic regeneration and cell-competition studies performed during the last century suggested that for size to be determined, organ-size is sensed and this sense of size feeds back into the growth control mechanism such that growth stops at the “correct” size. Recent work using Drosophila imaginal discs as a system has provided a particularly detailed cellular and molecular understanding of growth. Yet, a clear mechanistic basis for size-sensing has not emerged. I re-examine these studies from a different perspective and ask whether there is scope for alternate modes of size control in which size does not need to be sensed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document