scholarly journals Operationalization SECI Model of Knowledge Management by Enterprise Ontology

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-57
Author(s):  
Jan Andreasik
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Management ◽  
Seci Model ◽  
Enterprise Ontology

A Knowledge Management Process in Communities of Practice of Engineering Based on the SECI Model for Knowledge

2012 ◽  
pp. 134-149
Author(s):  
Akila Sarirete ◽  
Azeddine Chikh
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Management ◽  
Social Learning ◽  
Communities Of Practice ◽  
Knowledge Sharing ◽  
Explicit Knowledge ◽  
Management Process ◽  
High Importance ◽  
Web Technologies ◽  
Seci Model

With the vast movement toward promoting and developing models, practices, and technological environments in the engineering domain, a need exists to facilitate communication, collaboration, and coordination among its actors. Communities of Practice (CoPs) represent the natural and logical solution to answer these needs. In this paper, the authors propose a knowledge management process to exploit tacit and explicit knowledge in the engineering domain within the framework of a CoP of engineering. The approach used in this work introduces new elements in the Nonaka’s SECI model for knowledge creation. To validate the proposed process, a qualitative case study has been conducted on two CoPs, “CPsquare” and “The Cisco Learning Network”. It has been shown that CoPs and social learning impact learning as well as knowledge sharing. The use of web technologies and socio-technical approach in the management of knowledge is of high importance.

ENABLERS OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT ACROSS BORDERS: A STRUCTURAL APPROACH

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (04) ◽  
pp. 1350012
Author(s):  
R. MAGNIER-WATANABE ◽  
C. BENTON
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Management ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Organizational Factors ◽  
Organizational Control ◽  
Organizational Level ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Large Dataset ◽  
Seci Model ◽  
The Us ◽  
Strategic Assets

Although knowledge has been cited as one of the most important strategic assets, the creation and sharing of knowledge at the organizational level is a difficult process that will not proceed without incentives and conscious efforts by management. The complexity of knowledge management (KM) is further compounded by the influence of a wide variety of factors such as leadership, ba, organizational culture, organizational control and individual work styles. Based on a large dataset gathered from a questionnaire survey of a multi-national Japanese pharmaceutical company and its subsidiary in the US, we compare how the aforementioned organizational factors influence KM, expressed through the SECI model of socialization, externalization, combination and internalization. The results of a structural equation modeling path analysis show that a single model of KM should not be applied unilaterally to both organizations, although part of the same company, and instead may need to be adapted to each stage of KM maturity.

The Effect Of Knowledge Management System For Academic Services With SECI Model

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-88
Author(s):  
Nur Pusparini ◽  
◽  
Agus Budiyantara ◽  
Sofian Lusa ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Management ◽  
Management System ◽  
Knowledge Management System ◽  
Acceptance Test ◽  
Knowledge Process ◽  
Seci Model ◽  
Academic Position ◽  
Lack Of Information ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The One

Based on the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia – Article 37 of 2009 verse 8 states that a lecturer profession obliges to a minimum of 12 and maximum of 16 teaching credits in every semester according to his/her academic qualifications. Todays, Institute of Information Management and Computer Science (STMIK) Widuri has been applying a sharing knowledge process amid lecturers with the intention to assist them in academic position ladder management. However, problems are found during its implementation. First problem is infrequentTri Dharma practices (three principles of higher education; education, research and contribution to society)and reports being submitted by lecturers; the condition has resulted a statistic of STMIK active lecturers in general to decrease to 41.6%. Lack of information regarding Tri Dharma practices and its administrations known by its lecturers is the one missed to solve; a lecturer does not comprehensively understand what the stages are required in order to administer their academic position ladder. Second issue is there has been no media to facilitate lecturers to spread and share the knowledge and experience with the other fellow lecturers that the process of levelling up their academic tenures or positions become hampered. This means, the slower the process the longer it takes for them to move up to the next academic position ladder. As this is the case, the researchers propose aprototype of knowledge management system (KMS) utilizing SECI methodand gathering data through interviews, observations as well as literature studies. Software used is User Acceptance Test (UAT). Furthermore, the research has come up with a web-based KSM prototype with test percentage result76%; this means the system is accepted and matched the expectation.

scholarly journals The use of an enterprise ontology to support knowledge management in software development environments

2005 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karina Villela ◽  
Gleison Santos ◽  
Lílian Schnaider ◽  
Ana Regina Rocha ◽  
Guilherme Horta Travassos
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Management ◽  
Software Development ◽  
Enterprise Ontology ◽  
Software Development Environments

The SECI Model in Knowledge Management Practices

Mousaion ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aderonke Olaitan Adesina ◽  
Dennis N. Ocholla
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Management ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Knowledge Creation ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
High Impact ◽  
Journal Articles ◽  
Practical Application ◽  
Seci Model ◽  
Knowledge Management Practices ◽  
Meta Analyses

The purpose of this study was to review the socialisation, externalisation, combination and internalisation (SECI) model of knowledge management (KM), and to explore the trends of its use, challenges, and best practices in the model’s application in KM practice in the period from 1995 to 2018. Using the methodology known as the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA), we sought to do the following: establish whether the SECI model was more widely accepted than other KM models; examine specific demographic details of research studies on the SECI model; investigate the weaknesses of the model in practice; and generate a compendium of the use of the model in respect of the period we reviewed. Four databases were explored to search for open access, peer-reviewed, empirical journal articles. The study found that the SECI model continued to be widely accepted and used in spite of criticism levelled at it. Weaknesses that we noted in our review included the limitations of certain modes of the model in some areas of application and the non-linearity of the model in other areas. The study found evidence of exponential growth in the SECI model’s usage in the period reviewed. Also noted was the wide application of the model in knowledge creation studies in Africa. The study suggested that organisations could employ the model for their knowledge creation activities, but with the support of factors that enabled knowledge sharing. The model’s socialisation mode stood out as a mode of high impact, implying that the management teams of organisations needed to pay a lot of attention to it for effective organisational KM. This study generated a compendium for the practical application of the SECI model.  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document