scholarly journals The experiences of rural British Columbians accessing surgical and obstetrical care

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 126-134
Author(s):  
Aria Jazdarehee ◽  
Anshu Parajulee ◽  
Jude Kornelsen
Keyword(s):  
1999 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
David B Swedlow ◽  
Denise L de Bord ◽  
Christine Cunningham

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (03) ◽  
pp. e281-e287
Author(s):  
Sangeeta Kumaraswami ◽  
Tana S. Pradhan ◽  
Sorana Vrabie-Wolf ◽  
Sadaf Lodhi ◽  
Geetha P. Rajendran ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective To describe our experiences in preparing our obstetric unit in Westchester County, New York, during the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease of 2019) pandemic. We focus on describing our timeline, continuously evolving actions, observations, and challenges. Methods With guidance from the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH), our institutional epidemiologist, and key multidisciplinary faculty members, we evaluated emerging national data as well as expert opinions to identify issues and challenges to create action plans. Results We created and modified policies for our patients presenting for obstetrical care on the labor and delivery unit to accommodate their unique needs during this pandemic. Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic has posed many unique challenges. Balancing communication, risks of infection to providers, patient autonomy and rights, and resources for testing and personal protective equipment were among the valuable lessons learnt. We have shared our experiences and described our observations and challenges in Westchester County, New York.


1952 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 512
Author(s):  
Ernestine Wiedenbach ◽  
William S. Kroger ◽  
S. Charles Reed

2021 ◽  
Vol 224 (2) ◽  
pp. S545-S546
Author(s):  
Bethany Sabol ◽  
Megan C. Oakes ◽  
Dani Turnbull ◽  
Nandini Raghuraman ◽  
Jeannie Kelly ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Sindhu K. Srinivas

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 279-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Romijn ◽  
Pim W Teunissen ◽  
Martine C de Bruijne ◽  
Cordula Wagner ◽  
Christianne J M de Groot

BackgroundIn an obstetrical team, obstetricians, midwives and nurses work together in a dynamic and complex care setting. Different professional cultures can be a barrier for effective interprofessional collaboration. Although the different professional cultures in obstetrical care are well known, little is understood about discrepancies in mutual perceptions of collaboration. Similar perceptions of collaboration are important to ensure patient safety. We aimed to understand how different care professionals in an obstetrical team assess interprofessional collaboration in order to gain insight into the extent to which their perceptions are aligned.MethodsThis cross-sectional study was performed in the north-western region of the Netherlands. Care professionals from five hospitals and surrounding primary-care midwifery practices were surveyed. The respondents consisted of four groups of care professionals: obstetricians (n=74), hospital-based midwives known as clinical midwives (n=42), nurses (n=154) and primary-care midwives (n=109). The overall response rate was 80.8%. We used the Interprofessional Collaboration Measurement Scale (IPCMS) to assess perceived interprofessional collaboration. The IPCMS distinguishes three subscales: communication, accommodation and isolation. Data were analysed using non-parametrical tests.ResultsOverall, ratings of interprofessional collaboration were good. Obstetricians rated their collaboration with clinical midwives, nurses and primary-care midwives more positively than these three groups rated the collaboration with obstetricians. Discrepancies in mutual perceptions were most apparent in the isolation subscale, which is about sharing opinions, discussing new practices and respecting each other.ConclusionWe found relevant discrepancies in mutual perceptions of collaboration in obstetrical care in the Netherlands. Obstetrical care is currently being reorganised to enable more integrated care, which will have consequences for interprofessional collaboration. The findings of this study indicate opportunities for improvement especially in terms of perceived isolation.


BMJ Open ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. e011443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Romijn ◽  
Martine C de Bruijne ◽  
Pim W Teunissen ◽  
Christianne J M de Groot ◽  
Cordula Wagner

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document