scholarly journals A Study on the Need of Redefining Child Abuse and Redesigning New Responses to It — Through the Revision of Child Welfare Act —

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-25
Author(s):  
Solji Kwon
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-139
Author(s):  
Vivek Sankaran ◽  
Christopher Church

Over the past decade, the child welfare system has expanded, with vast public and private resources being spent on the system. Despite this investment, there is scant evidence suggesting a meaningful return on investment. This Article argues that without a change in the values held by the system, increased funding will not address the public health problems of child abuse and neglect.


1985 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 3-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara J. Meddin

AbstractThe paper examines the impact that a decision making model can have on child placement decisions. Using a pre and post test design with three different conditions, the research investigated the ability to increase the consistency of the placement decision by the use of a decision making model that includes explicit criteria.The study found that consistency of decision making was enhanced by the provision of the decision making model and that consistency could be further enhanced by the provision of training in the model. Implications for training of new workers and reduction of worker stress and burnout are discussed.The incident of child abuse and neglect continues to rise. The National Centre on Child Abuse and Neglect estimates that approximately one million children will be abused or neglected this year in the United States. In the State of Illinois alone, during fiscal year 1981 nearly 80,000 reports of abuse or neglect were received. Almost 50% of those reports were found to be actual cases of abuse or neglect.Whether the incident in Australia of child abuse and neglect is increasing or not is difficult to assess, since currently there is no standardised way of collecting data. However, from all indicators a similar increase is indeed occurring. Boss in his book, “On the Side of the Child”, reports that the number of cases seen by the Western Australian Department of Community Welfare has steadily increased. This is corroborated by statistics compiled by that State’s Advisory and Consultative Committee in Child Abuse (ACCCA). Their Statistical Information Report for July-December 1983 indicates an 86% increase in reports of sexual abuse and 12.5% increase in physical abuse. In Queensland the number of child abuse and/or neglect case investigations went from 1 095 in 1981 to 1 631 in 1982 – an increase of more than one third. In Tasmania between 1980 to 1982 the number of reports increased by nearly one-third, from 228-302. The Montrose Child Protection and Family Crisis Unit of the Department of Youth and Community Services in New South Wales report similar increases.On almost a daily basis, social workers are called upon to make far reaching decisions that have the potential to be a life consequential both for the child who is the victim of abuse and/or neglect and that child’s family. Because these decisions, especially the placement decision, have such great ramifications, social workers should be expected to make decisions with great care, consideration and consistency. This may be due, in part because agencies have been slow to explicate, empirically validate, and systematically apply decision making criteria that assist workers in making case decisions.While research indicates that criteria do exist and are used by child welfare workers, the research also indicates that they are not used in any systematic fashion. The result is that idiosyncratic decisions are invited and the potential spectre of gross inequities in the delivery of social services exists. Unless asystematic, consensually based decision making model is used that explicates both the decisions that need to be made along with a specific set of criteria for making these decisions, it is impossible for the child welfare agency to guarantee a minimum level of service delivery.


Author(s):  
Richard P. Barth ◽  
Mark Courtney ◽  
Jill Duerr Berrick ◽  
Vicky Albert

2006 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 316-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen D. Whitney ◽  
Emiko A. Tajima ◽  
Todd I. Herrenkohl ◽  
Bu Huang
Keyword(s):  

1977 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ottar Tangen

The practice of good medical ethics is of particular importance in cases of juvenile maltreatment. In a number of court cases concerning battered children doctors' statements have been presented to the effect that maltreatment has not taken place. In twelve cases reported during the period 1971–75 the doctors' statement was misleading. In each of twelve cases it should have been the doctor's duty to record in his statement that this was a case of child abuse and/or neglect. It appears that as far as the individual doctor was concerned, he often stated “these things should be dealt with by the child welfare authorities”, who in their turn merely referred to the doctor's statement. “It is unlikely that this is maltreatment”, the child welfare officer will reiterate. In six cases this statement was used in court before any evaluation had been made on the basis of the sequence of events. In all twelve cases the doctor had failed to make an adequate examination of the symptoms. It seems as if the doctor was not sufficiently interested in providing evidence of assault. In some cases, even, pathognomonic findings must have been kept secret. Psychological or emotional maltreatment need to be evaluated by a child psychologist who is a practical diagnostician. Injuries arising from physical abuse are most successfully diagnosed on surgical and casualty wards. Pediatricians must be cautious about dismissing diagnoses of maltreatment that have been established by other specialists, especially child psychologists.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document