scholarly journals Empirical Work on Workforce Participation in Workplace Health Promotion Programs in Indian Corporate Sector

The present study tries to investigate and analyze the key determinants that influence an employee’s intention regarding participation in Worksite Health Promotion programs in Indian Corporate Sector. The study also tries to find out the applicability and validity of theory of planned behavior (Ajzen, 1991) in explaining the behavior of employees in terms of participation in Worksite health promotion programs in the Indian Corporate Sector. The study adopts the primary survey to collect the responses of 256 sample respondents collected through online questionnaire survey from Indian industries. After assessing the reliability of the variables followed by variable extraction using principle component analysis, the responses are analyzed using ordinary least square method. The findings of the study suggest that three factors such as environment at workplace, influence of peers and personal beliefs play a significant role in affecting the employee’s participation in workplace health programs.

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 359-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Stiehl ◽  
Namrata Shivaprakash ◽  
Esther Thatcher ◽  
India J. Ornelas ◽  
Shawn Kneipp ◽  
...  

Objective: To determine: (1) What research has been done on health promotion interventions for low-wage workers and (2) what factors are associated with effective low-wage workers’ health promotion programs. Data Source: This review includes articles from PubMed and PsychINFO published in or before July 2016. Study Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria: The search yielded 130 unique articles, 35 met the inclusion criteria: (1) being conducted in the United States, (2) including an intervention or empirical data around health promotion among adult low-wage workers, and (3) measuring changes in low-wage worker health. Data Extraction: Central features of the selected studies were extracted, including the theoretical foundation; study design; health promotion intervention content and delivery format; intervention-targeted outcomes; sample characteristics; and work, occupational, and industry characteristics. Data Analysis: Consistent with a scoping review, we used a descriptive, content analysis approach to analyze extracted data. All authors agreed upon emergent themes and 2 authors independently coded data extracted from each article. Results: The results suggest that the research on low-wage workers’ health promotion is limited, but increasing, and that low-wage workers have limited access to and utilization of worksite health promotion programs. Conclusion: Workplace health promotion programs could have a positive effect on low-wage workers, but more work is needed to understand how to expand access, what drives participation, and which delivery mechanisms are most effective.


AAOHN Journal ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 55 (8) ◽  
pp. 321-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Belinda J. McGrath

Childcare workers are exposed to several health and safety risks in their work environment, the most common being infectious diseases, musculoskeletal injuries, accidents, and occupational stress. Pregnant childcare workers have an additional risk of potential harm to the fetus. Occupational health nurses can work collaboratively with childcare workers to reduce these risks and provide workplace health promotion programs. This article explores the occupational health and safety issues for childcare workers and suggests health promotion strategies that could be implemented by occupational health nurses working in this arena.


2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Debbie Wierenga ◽  
Luuk H Engbers ◽  
Pepijn Van Empelen ◽  
Saskia Duijts ◽  
Vincent H Hildebrandt ◽  
...  

1990 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 17-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Sciacca ◽  
Roger Seehafer ◽  
Roger Reed ◽  
Calvin Berry

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 845-849 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul E. Terry

Professionals interested in advancing best practices in worksite wellness have been calling for more organizational and environmental approaches that will advance a culture of health. We seem to be getting the message across because a recent national survey shows that “supportive social and physical environment” is one of the 5 elements used to define a comprehensive program that has increased the most from 29.2% naming this as part of their approach in 2004 to 56% of companies in 2017. Yet 2 worksite health promotion studies that garnered media attention this past year offer telling examples of what occurs when researchers conflate or confuse the effectiveness of a health education program with a socioecological approach. I would suggest we replace the term “comprehensive programs” with “socioecological approach” or a “culture of health approach” or, at least, “a comprehensive approach,” anything but continued use of the oxymoronic term “comprehensive program.”


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document