scholarly journals Human Computer Interface using Eye Gazing with error fixation in Smooth and Saccadic Eye Movement

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 336-346
Author(s):  
Judy Simon

Human Computer Interface (HCI) requires proper coordination and definition of features that serve as input to the system. The parameters of a saccadic and smooth eye movement tracking are observed and a comparison is drawn for HCI. This methodology is further incorporated with Pupil, OpenCV and Microsoft Visual Studio for image processing to identify the position of the pupil and observe the pupil movement direction in real-time. Once the direction is identified, it is possible to determine the accurate cruise position which moves towards the target. To quantify the differences between the step-change tracking of saccadic eye movement and incremental tracking of smooth eye movement, the test was conducted on two users. With the help of incremental tracking of smooth eye movement, an accuracy of 90% is achieved. It is found that the incremental tracking requires an average time of 7.21s while the time for step change tracking is just 2.82s. Based on the observations, it is determined that, when compared to the saccadic eye movement tracking, the smooth eye movement tracking is over four times more accurate. Therefore, the smooth eye tracking was found to be more accurate, precise, reliable, and predictable to use with the mouse cursor than the saccadic eye movement tracking.

2021 ◽  
Vol 1802 (4) ◽  
pp. 042066
Author(s):  
Zhaowei Li ◽  
Peiyuan Guo ◽  
Chen Song

2003 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 1053-1077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linden J. Ball ◽  
Erica J. Lucas ◽  
Jeremy N. V. Miles ◽  
Alastair G. Gale

Three experiments are reported that used eye-movement tracking to investigate the inspection-time effect predicted by Evans’ (1996) heuristic-analytic account of the Wason selection task. Evans’ account proposes that card selections are based on the operation of relevance-determining heuristics, whilst analytic processing only rationalizes selections. As such, longer inspection times should be associated with selected cards (which are subjected to rationalization) than with rejected cards. Evidence for this effect has been provided by Evans (1996) using computer- presented selection tasks and instructions for participants to indicate (with a mouse pointer) cards under consideration. Roberts (1998b) has argued that mouse pointing gives rise to artefactual support for Evans’ predictions because of biases associated with the task format and the use of mouse pointing. We eradicated all sources of artefact by combining careful task constructions with eye-movement tracking to measure directly on-line attentional processing. All three experiments produced good evidence for the robustness of the inspection-time effect, supporting the predictions of the heuristic-analytic account.


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 2592-2598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zheng-Nan Zhao ◽  
Ju Lin ◽  
Jie Zhang ◽  
Yang Yu ◽  
Bo Yuan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document