scholarly journals The Canonical Join Complex

10.37236/7866 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Barnard

A canonical join representation is a certain minimal "factorization" of an element in a finite lattice $L$ analogous to the prime factorization of an integer from number theory. The expression $\bigvee A =w$ is the canonical join representation of $w$ if $A$ is the unique lowest subset of $L$ satisfying $\bigvee A=w$ (where "lowest" is made precise by comparing order ideals under containment). Canonical join representations appear in many familiar guises, with connections to comparability graphs and noncrossing partitions. When each element in $L$ has a canonical join representation, we define the canonical join complex to be the abstract simplicial complex of subsets $A$ such that $\bigvee A$ is a canonical join representation. We characterize the class of finite lattices whose canonical join complex is flag, and show how the canonical join complex is related to the topology of $L$.

10.37236/1723 ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Blass

We exhibit an explicit homotopy equivalence between the geometric realizations of the order complex of a finite lattice and the simplicial complex of coreless sets of atoms whose join is not ${}\hat 1{}$. This result, which extends a theorem of Segev, leads to a description of the homology of a finite lattice, extending a result of Björner for geometric lattices.


1987 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph P. S. Kung

AbstractLet and ℳ be subsets of a finite lattice L. is said to be concordant with ℳ if, for every element x in L, either x is in ℳ or there exists an element x+ such that (CS1) the Möbius function μ(x, x+) ≠ 0 and (CS2) for every element j in , x ∨ j ≠ x+. We prove that if is concordant with ℳ, then the incidence matrix I(ℳ | ) has maximum possible rank ||, and hence there exists an injection σ: → ℳ such that σ(j) ≥ j for all j in . Using this, we derive several rank and covering inequalities in finite lattices. Among the results are generalizations of the Dowling-Wilson inequalities and Dilworth's covering theorem to semimodular lattices, and a refinement of Dilworth's covering theorem for modular lattices.


1970 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 569-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. K. Thomason

In this paper we shall prove that every finite lattice is isomorphic to a sublattice of the degrees of unsolvability, and that every one of a certain class of finite lattices is isomorphic to an initial segment of degrees.Acknowledgment. I am grateful to Ralph McKenzie for his assistance in matters of lattice theory.1. Representation of lattices. The equivalence lattice of the set S consists of all equivalence relations on S, ordered by setting θ ≦ θ’ if for all a and b in S, a θ b ⇒ a θ’ b. The least upper bound and greatest lower bound in are given by the ⋃ and ⋂ operations:


1976 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 313-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zofia Adamowicz

Theorem. Assume that there exists a standard model of ZFC + V = L. Then there is a model of ZFC in which the partial ordering of the degrees of constructibility of reals is isomorphic with a given finite lattice.The proof of the theorem uses forcing. The definition of the forcing conditions and the proofs of some of the lemmas are connected with Lerman's paper on initial segments of the upper semilattice of the Turing degrees [2]. As an auxiliary notion we shall introduce the notion of a sequential representation of a lattice, which slightly differs from Lerman's representation.Let K be a given finite lattice. Assume that the universe of K is an integer l. Let ≤K be the ordering in K. A sequential representation of K is a sequence Ui ⊆ Ui+1 of finite subsets of ωi such that the following holds:(1) For any s, s′ Є Ui, i Є ω, k, m Є l, k ≤Km & s(m) = s′(m) → s(k) = s′(k).(2) For any s Є Ui, i Є ω, s(0) = 0 where 0 is the least element of K.(3) For any s, s′ Є i Є ω, k,j Є l, if k y Kj = m and s(k) = s′(k) & s(j) = s′(j) → s(m) = s′(m), where vK denotes the join in K.


1996 ◽  
Vol 74 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 54-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. D. Betts ◽  
S. Masui ◽  
N. Vats ◽  
G. E. Stewart

The well-known finite-lattice method for the calculation of the properties of quantum spin systems on a two-dimensional lattice at zero temperature was introduced in 1978. The method has now been greatly improved for the square lattice by including finite lattices based on parallelogram tiles as well as the familiar finite lattices based on square tiles. Dozens of these new finite lattices have been tested and graded using the [Formula: see text] ferromagnet. In the process new and improved estimates have been obtained for the XY model's ground-state energy per spin, ε0 = −0.549 36(30) and spontaneous magnetization per spin, m = 0.4349(10). Other properties such as near-neighbour, zero-temperature spin–spin correlations, which appear not to have been calculated previously, have been estimated to high precision. Applications of the improved finite-lattice method to other models can readily be carried out.


1977 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 349-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zofia Adamowicz

We shall prove the following theorem:Theorem. For any finite lattice there is a model of ZF in which the partial ordering of the degrees of constructibility is isomorphic with the given lattice.Let M be a standard countable model of ZF satisfying V = L. Let K be the given finite lattice. We shall extend M by forcing.The paper is divided into two parts. The first part concerns the definition of the set of forcing conditions and some properties of this set expressible without the use of generic filters.We define first a representation of a lattice and then the set of conditions. In Lemmas 1, 2 we show that there are some canonical isomorphisms between some conditions and that a single condition has some canonical automorphisms.In Lemma 3 and Definition 7 we show some methods of defining conditions. We shall use those methods in the second part to define certain conditions with special properties.Lemma 4 gives a connection between the sets P and Pk (see Definitions 4 and 5). It is next employed in the second part in Lemma 10 in an essential way.Indeed, Lemma 10 is necessary for Lemma 13, which is the crucial point of the whole construction. Lemma 5 is also employed in Lemma 13 (exactly in its Corollary).The second part of the paper is devoted to the examination of the structure of degrees of constructibility in a generic model. First, we show that degrees of some “sections” of a generic real (Definition 9) form a lattice isomorphic with K. Secondly, we show that there are no other degrees in the generic model; this is the most difficult property to obtain by forcing. We prove, in two stages, that it holds in our generic models. We first show, by using special properties of the forcing conditions, that sets of ordinal numbers have no other degrees. Then we show that the degrees of sets of ordinals already determine the degrees of other sets.


1979 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Day

In [8], McKenzie introduced the notion of a bounded homomorphism between lattices, and, using this concept, proved several deep results in lattice theory. Some of these results were intimately connected with the work of Jónsson and Kiefer in [6] where an attempt was made to characterize finite sublattices of free lattices. McKenzie's characterization and others that followed (see [7] and [5]) still have not answered the (now) celebrated Jônsson conjecture:A finite lattice is a sublattice of a free lattice if and only if it satisfies (SD∨), (SD∨) and (W).(The properties mentioned here are defined in the text.)


1992 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-125
Author(s):  
S. C. Power

AbstractA unique factorisation theorem is obtained for tensor products of finite lattices of commuting projections in a factor. This leads to unique tensor product factorisations for reflexive subalgebras of the hyperfinite II1 factor which have irreducible finite commutative invariant projection lattices. It is shown that the finite refinement property fails for simple approximately finite C*-algebras, and this implies that there is no analogous general result for finite lattice subalgebras in this context.


1997 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
ULRICH MARTIN HIRTH

The prime factorization of a random integer has a GEM/Poisson-Dirichlet distribution as transparently proved by Donnelly and Grimmett [8]. By similarity to the arc-sine law for the mean distribution of the divisors of a random integer, due to Deshouillers, Dress and Tenenbaum [6] (see also Tenenbaum [24, II.6.2, p. 233]), – the ‘DDT theorem’ – we obtain an arc-sine law in the GEM/Poisson-Dirichlet context. In this context we also investigate the distribution of the number of components larger than ε which correspond to the number of prime factors larger than nε.


2004 ◽  
Vol 04 (03) ◽  
pp. L413-L424 ◽  
Author(s):  
FERDINAND GRÜNEIS

We investigate the probabilities for a return to the origin at step n of a random walker on a finite lattice. As a consistent measure only the first returns to the origin appear to be of relevance; these include paths with self-intersections and self-avoiding polygons. Their return probabilities are power-law distributed giving rise to 1/f b noise. Most striking is the behavior of the self-avoiding polygons exhibiting a slope b=0.83 for d=2 and b=0.93 for d=3 independent on lattice structure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document