Transmission and Genetic Stability of No-homoeologous Small Fragment Wheat-Haynaldia villosaTranslocation Chromosomes withPm21in Various Cultivar Backgrounds of Common Wheat

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hai-Yan WANG ◽  
Jin XIAO ◽  
Chun-Xia YUAN ◽  
Tao XU ◽  
Chun-Yan YU ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikiko Yanaka ◽  
Kanenori Takata ◽  
Tatsuya M. Ikeda ◽  
Naoyuki Ishikawa

2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-14
Author(s):  
GRZEGORZ SZUMIŁO ◽  
LESZEK RACHOŃ ◽  
BARBARA KROCHMAL-MARCZAK

The 3-year experiment was concerned with the response of spring forms of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L. subsp. aestivum), durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) and spelt wheat (Triticum aestivum subsp. spelta L. em. Thell.) to the foliar application of a plant growth stimulant (extract from marine algae Ecklonia maxima), with the commercial name of Kelpak SL (GS), as compared to control treatment (C). The following parameters were analysed: yield of grain, yield components (number of ears, weight of 1000 kernels, number and weight of kernels per ear) and physical indicators of grain quality (test weight, uniformity and vitreosity of grain). The study showed that the level of yielding and the yield components were related primarily with the wheat genotype, but they depended also on the agro-climatic conditions and on the algae extract and control experimental treatments. The application of algae extract, compared to the control, caused a significant increase in the yields of the spring wheat species under study, on average by 7.0%. Canopy spraying with algae extract had a favourable effect on the number of ears, on he number and weight of kernels per ear, but it had no effect on the weight of 1000 kernels. The grain quality of durum wheat, spelt wheat and common wheat was affected more strongly by the weather conditions in the successive years of the study and by the genotype than by the foliar application of algae extract. The spelt genotypes were characterised by lower yields and lower grain quality than common wheat and the durum wheat genotypes.


2020 ◽  
pp. 105-118
Author(s):  
Zoryana Кupchyns’ka

Proper names of people as creating stems are represented in oiconymy of Ukraine. Anthroponymy separated from o iconymy of Ukraine ending in *-inъ is only a small fragment of a large amount of proper names and their variants. The actual problem is creating the dictionary of personal names of people, which would contain anthroponymy derived from archaic oiconymy. It would enrich not only the Ukrainian anthroponymicon but AllSlavonic one. 251 anthroponym of canonical origin is distinguished from geographical names of Ukraine ending in *-inъ. Most of Christian anthroponyms are represented in dictionaries as names of people or as bynames/proto-surnames. It is found out that 30 names (12%) are not represented in lexicographical works: Аврата (< Гаврило), Горпа (< Агрипина//Горпина), Демх(ш)а (< Дем’ян), Домашла (< Домна, Домнікія, Домаха), Ільпа (< Ілля), Кузята (< Кузьма), Макиш(х)а (< Матвій, розм. Макій), Макош(х)а (< Матвій, розм. Макій), Манята (< Марія), Мар’ята (< Мар’яна), Матюш(х)а (< Матвій), Митула (< Дмитро), Михла (< Михайло), Мишера (< Михайло), Мишута (< Михайло), Нита(я) (< Нит), Ол(ъ)ма (< Олъма), Панчоха (< Пантелеймон), Парута (< Парасковія), Пилипчата (< Пилип), Савара (< Север, Северин), Стеська (< Степан), Таша (< Наталія), Теола (< Теофіла, Феофіла), Тимота (< Тимофій), Томара (< Тамара), Фетюха (< Федір), Юриця (< Юрій), Якота (< Яків), Янкулиха (< Ян).


2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 1606-1612
Author(s):  
Ping-Ping ZHANG ◽  
Hong-Xiang MA ◽  
Jin-Bao YAO ◽  
Zhong-Hu HE

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (10) ◽  
pp. 1791-1801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng DAI ◽  
Jin-Peng ZHANG ◽  
Xiao-Yang WU ◽  
Xin-Ming YANG ◽  
Xiu-Quan LI ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 642
Author(s):  
Jun-Li DAI ◽  
Lei CUI ◽  
Ke LIU ◽  
Ying-Ying ZONG ◽  
Hong-Xia YUAN ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document