Regulatory Focus in Consumer Behavior Research

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 347-357
Author(s):  
Feifan YIN ◽  
Yong WANG
2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsuan-Hsuan Ku ◽  
Yi-Ting Chang

Purpose Individuals concerned about safety comprise a significant share of the consumer market today. This paper aims to provide the results of a study on when a front-of-package (FOP) claim about “no added negatives” can serve as a quality cue. Design/methodology/approach Four between-subjects experiments examine consumers’ quality perceptions in responses to the absence-focused claims and also identifies brand parity (Studies 1a and 1b) and the associated launch of inconsistent alternatives as moderators (Study 2) and investigate the extent to which the quality signaling value of absence-focused claims varies as a function of message regulatory focus (Study 3). Findings Research shows that a unique absence-focused claim indicates product quality (Studies 1a and 1b). However, there could be a cost in terms of reduced perceived quality when adding an inconsistent alternative to a brand (Study 2). Furthermore, consumers associate greater product quality with absence-focused FOP claims if an appeal is framed as prevention-focused rather than promotion-focused benefits (Study 3). Originality/value This study advances knowledge on the effects of front-of-package claims on consumer behavior and benefits marketers in determining effective front-of-package messages for product promotion.


2007 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lioba Werth ◽  
Jens Foerster

Author(s):  
Lucy Atkinson

Climate change specifically and the environment more generally are becoming increasingly central features in much of contemporary persuasive messages. From World Wildlife Fund public service announcements showing the Earth as a melting scoop of ice cream to advertisements for environmentally friendly hybrid cars set against backdrops of lush, green fields, climate change and the environment are closely linked to strategic communication and consumer behavior. This growing focus on the connection between climate change and consumption represents a wide and varied field of study, underscoring the ways in which the two can at once be symbiotic and yet also antagonistic. Meaningful academic attention to environmental cues in advertising can be thought of as occurring in two waves. In the first wave, peaking in the 1990s, research was concerned primarily with content analyses of advertising containing environmental appeals. Questions about deceptive environmental claims, often referred to as greenwashing, were a primary concern during this phase. Climate change specifically was not a central element, and instead, issues of environmental preservation and conservation dominated. In the second wave, which emerged in the late 2000s and continues unabated, researchers have broadened their focus to examine not only how the environment was depicted in advertising messages but also how audiences understood them. Attention was paid to message factors, like framing, source cues, and visual depictions, as well as individual-level factors, such as environmental concern, political ideology and regulatory focus. While concerns about greenwashing and deceptive advertising continue to plague green advertising, a collection of new critiques has emerged, including questions about the implications of emphasizing consumer behavior as a source of climate change mitigation, of relying on nature as a commodity to be sold and used, and of engaging individuals as consumers rather than as citizens in attempts to effect environmental change.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (14) ◽  
pp. 5653
Author(s):  
Jaekwon Chung

Quality uncertainty is one of the major challenges for new products entering a market. Companies launching new products may consider price-related promotions to stimulate consumer purchases. Prior studies have investigated the impacts of quality uncertainty and price-related promotions on consumer behavior. However, studies that consider quality uncertainty and price-related promotions on consumers’ perceived savings based on regulatory focus are rare. Therefore, this study aims at investigating the impacts of price-related promotions (price discount and value-added promotion), quality uncertainty (high vs. low), and regulatory focus (promotion vs. prevention) on perceived savings. Survey studies were conducted, and results were analyzed. The results indicate that when quality uncertainty level is high, perceived savings for price discount and value-added promotions are higher for promotion-focused consumers compared with prevention-focused consumers. By contrast, when quality uncertainty level is low, perceived savings for price discount and value-added promotions are higher for prevention-focused consumers compared with promotion-focused consumers. The results of this study are expected to assist companies in introducing new products to develop sustainable price-related promotions.


1987 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 795-796
Author(s):  
Thomas K. Srull
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document