Routing protocols for opportunistic networks

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 723-728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi REN ◽  
Yong HUANG ◽  
Qian-bin CHEN
Author(s):  
Aliyu M. Abali ◽  
Norafida Bte Ithnin ◽  
Tekenate Amah Ebibio ◽  
Muhammad Dawood ◽  
Wadzani A. Gadzama

2013 ◽  
pp. 353-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjay Kumar Dhurandher ◽  
Deepak Kumar Sharma ◽  
Isaac Woungang ◽  
Shruti Bhati

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Puneet Garg ◽  
Ashutosh Dixit ◽  
Preeti Sethi ◽  
Plácido Rogerio Pinheiro

The need and importance of Smart Spaces have been potentially realized by the researchers due to its applicability in the current lifestyle. Opportunistic network, a successor of mobile ad hoc networks and a budding technology of network, is a best-suited technology for implementing Smart Spaces due to its wide range of applications in real-life scenarios ranging from building smart cities to interplanetary communication. There are numerous routing protocols which are available in opportunistic network, each having their pros and cons; however, no research till the time of listing has been done which can quantitatively demonstrate the maximum performance of these protocols and standardize the comparison of opportunistic routing protocols which has been a major cause of ambiguous performance evaluation studies. The work here presents a categorical view of the opportunistic routing protocol family and thereby compares and contrasts the various simulators suited for their simulation. Thereafter, the most popular protocols (selecting at least one protocol from each category) are compared based on node density on as many as 8 standard performance metrics using ONE simulator to observe their scalability, realism, and comparability. The work concludes by presenting the merits and demerits of each of the protocols discussed as well as specifying the best routing protocol among all the available protocols for Smart Spaces with maximum output. It is believed that the results achieved by the implemented methodology will help future researchers to choose appropriate routing protocol to delve into their research under different scenarios.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Majeed Alajeely ◽  
Robin Doss ◽  
Asma'a Ahmad

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aarti Munjal ◽  
Tracy Camp ◽  
Nils Aschenbruck

A phenomenal increase in the number of wireless devices has led to the evolution of several interesting and challenging research problems in opportunistic networks. For example, the random waypoint mobility model, an early, popular effort to model mobility, involves generatingrandommovement patterns. Previous research efforts, however, validate that movement patterns are not random; instead, human mobility is predictable to some extent. Since the performance of a routing protocol in an opportunistic network is greatly improved if the movement patterns of mobile users can be somewhat predicted in advance, several research attempts have been made to understand human mobility. The solutions developed use our understanding of movement patterns to predict the future contact probability for mobile nodes. In this work, we summarize the changing trends in modeling human mobility asrandommovements to the current research efforts that model human walks in a more predictable manner. Mobility patterns significantly affect the performance of a routing protocol. Thus, the changing trend in modeling mobility has led to several changes in developing routing protocols for opportunistic networks. For example, the simplest opportunistic routing protocol forwards a received packet to a randomly selected neighbor. With predictable mobility, however, routing protocols can use the expected contact information between a pair of mobile nodes in making forwarding decisions. In this work, we also describe the previous and current research efforts in developing routing protocols for opportunistic networks.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document