Torsional resistance of drilled shaft foundations: a state-of-the-art review

Author(s):  
Victor Hugo Aguilar ◽  
J. Michael Stallings ◽  
J. Brian Anderson ◽  
Andrzej Nowak
2016 ◽  
Vol 53 (12) ◽  
pp. 1928-1938 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudheesh Thiyyakkandi ◽  
Michael McVay ◽  
Peter Lai ◽  
Rodrigo Herrera

Drilled shaft foundations supporting mast arm assemblies are subjected to significant torsion and lateral load during severe wind loading (e.g., hurricane). Past centrifuge studies in granular soils suggest that the design of such foundations should be performed for a coupled load case, since the lateral resistance is considerably reduced by the concurrent application of torsion. However, current design practice still considers lateral load and torsion independently due to the lack of field verification of centrifuge results. This paper reports on a full-scale test program to investigate the coupled load behavior of drilled shafts. A novel load test setup (with a heavy-duty mast arm assembly) and instrumentation were used for the combined torsion and lateral loading (e.g., wind loading). The study revealed a significant reduction in lateral resistance due to the influence of torque as observed from previous centrifuge studies. Torsional resistance was reduced (approximately 20%) by the impact of lateral load when compared with the anticipated torsional resistance based on unit skin friction values, derived from the axial load test results (i.e., no influence of lateral load). A comparison of measured torsional resistance during the combined loading with the predicted values using different approaches was also made. O’Neill and Hassan’s beta (β) method (sand) and alpha method (clay) are found to predict the torsional resistance reasonably well (±10%), while all other methods based on the standard penetration test and cone penetration test considered in the study overpredicted or underpredicted the resistance.


Author(s):  
Abdalla M. Harraz ◽  
William N. Houston ◽  
Kenneth D. Walsh ◽  
Courtland R. Perry ◽  
Sandra L. Houston

1998 ◽  
Vol 1633 (1) ◽  
pp. 120-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry D. Olson ◽  
Marwan F. Aouad ◽  
Dennis A. Sack

Nondestructive methods based on propagation of sonic and ultrasonic waves are being used increasingly in the United States and internationally for forensic investigations of existing structures and for quality assurance of new construction. Of particular interest is the quality assurance of newly constructed drilled shaft foundations. Many state departments of transportation specify nondestructive testing of drilled shaft foundations, particularly for shafts drilled and placed under wet construction conditions. For quality assurance of drilled shaft foundations of bridges, the crosshole sonic logging (CSL) and sonic echo and impulse response (SE/IR) methods routinely are used. In the CSL method, access tubes are installed in the shaft before concrete placement. SE/IR measurements require that the top of the shaft be accessible after concrete placement. Proper test setups, specifications, and case studies are presented to illustrate the advantages and disadvantages of each of these methods. Also presented are recommendations for repair when a defect is identified in a drilled shaft foundation. The CSL method is more effective for locating defects. CSL measurements are effective for determining anomalies and defects between two access tubes. However, an accurate image of the defect cannot be determined from a CSL test alone. The crosshole tomography (CT) method uses multiple CSL logs with varying receiver locations to produce a two-dimensional image of the defect. The CT method is discussed and a dataset obtained from a drilled shaft foundation is presented. CT data collection and analysis require more time than the CSL method, and the CT method is used only for critical drilled shaft foundations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document