scholarly journals Retrospective Cohort Study of Unresectable Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Canada

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 354-360
Author(s):  
S.J. Seung ◽  
M. Hurry ◽  
R.N. Walton ◽  
W.K. Evans

Background: The management of unresectable stage iii non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is complex and best determined through multidisciplinary consultation. A longitudinal, population-level study was carried out to describe the management approach and outcomes of treatment in the real-world setting in Ontario. Methods: Individuals diagnosed with nsclc between 1 April 2010 and 31 March 2015 were identified in the Ontario Cancer Registry. Unresectable disease was defined as no surgery reported within 3 months of diagnosis. Initial treatments included radiotherapy (RT, curative or palliative), chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and chemoradiation [CRT, concurrent (cCRT) or sequential (sCRT)]. Survival was calculated from diagnosis with stage III disease to death or last follow-up. Results: Of the 24,729 individuals diagnosed with nsclc, 5243 (21.2%) had stage iii disease, with most of the latter group (4542, 86.6%) having unresectable disease. Median age was 70 years, and 54.2% were men. The frequency of first-line treatment was cCRT, 22.1%; palliative rt, 21.0%; curative rt, 19.6%; no treatment, 19.6%; chemotherapy alone, 11.6%; sCRT, 5.4%; and targeted therapy, 0.7%. Median overall survival (mOS) was 14.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 13.6 months to 14.7 months], with the longest survival observed in patients who received targeted therapy (mOS: 34.7 months; 95% CI: 21.4 months to 51.2 months), and the poorest, in those receiving no cancer treatment (mOS: 5.9 months; 95% CI: 5.0 months to 6.4 months). The mOS in patients receiving cCRT was 23.6 months (95% CI: 21.4 months to 25.6 months). Conclusions: Guideline-recommended cCRT is undertaken in only a small proportion of patients with unresectable NSCLC in Ontario. The reasons for low uptake of that recommendation are only partly understood.

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessio Bruni ◽  
Vieri Scotti ◽  
Paolo Borghetti ◽  
Stefano Vagge ◽  
Salvatore Cozzi ◽  
...  

IntroductionFor unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the standard therapy consists of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by durvalumab maintenance for responding patients. The present study reports on the safety and outcome of durvalumab use after CRT in a real-world, multicenter, retrospective cohort.MethodsTwo hundred thirty-eight patients have been included. We collected data on systemic therapy, radiation therapy, the timing between CRT and durvalumab, number of durvalumab cycles, reasons for non-starting or discontinuation, incidence and grade of adverse events (AEs), and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).ResultsOne hundred fifty-five patients out of 238 (65.1%) received at least one durvalumab dose: 91 (58.7%) after concomitant CRT (cCRT) and 64 (41.3%) after sequential CRT (sCRT). Programmed-death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status was unknown in 7/155 (4.5%), negative in 14 (9.1%), and positive ≥1% in 134/155 (86.4%). The main reasons for non-starting durvalumab were progression (10.1%), PD-L1 negativity (7.5%), and lung toxicity (4.6%). Median follow-up time was 14 months (range 2–29); 1-year PFS and OS were 83.5% (95%CI: 77.6–89.7) and 97.2% (95%CI: 94.6–99.9), respectively. No significant differences in PFS or OS were detected for cCRT vs. sCRT, but the median PFS was 13.5 months for sCRT vs. 23 months for cCRT. Potentially immune-related AEs were recorded in 76/155 patients (49.0%). Pneumonitis was the most frequent, leading to discontinuation in 11/155 patients (7.1%).ConclusionsDurvalumab maintenenace after concurrent or sequential chemoradiation for unresectable, stage III NSCLC showed very promising short-term survival results in a large, multicenter, restrospective, real-world study. Durvalumab was the first drug obtaining a survival benefit over CRT within the past two decades, and the present study contributes to validating its use in clinical practice.


2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 388-394
Author(s):  
Kazumasa Ogawa ◽  
Yui Takahashi ◽  
Kyoko Murase ◽  
Shigeo Hanada ◽  
Hironori Uruga ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document