scholarly journals Fecal calprotectin measurement is a marker of short-term clinical outcome and presence of mucosal healing in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (41) ◽  
pp. 7387-7396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Athanasios Kostas ◽  
Spyros I Siakavellas ◽  
Charalambos Kosmidis ◽  
Anna Takou ◽  
Joanna Nikou ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Bing-Jie Xiang ◽  
Min Jiang ◽  
Ming-Jun Sun ◽  
Cong Dai

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a promising marker for assessment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) activity. However, the utility of FC for predicting mucosal healing (MH) of IBD patients has yet to be clearly demonstrated. The objective of our study was to perform a meta-analysis evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of FC in predicting MH of IBD patients. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We systematically searched the databases for studies from inception to April 2020 that evaluated MH in IBD. The methodological quality of each study was assessed according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies checklist. The extracted data were pooled using a summary receiver operating characteristic curve model. Random-effects model was used to summarize the diagnostic odds ratio, sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Sixteen studies comprising 1,682 ulcerative colitis (UC) patients and 4 studies comprising 221 Crohn’s disease (CD) patients were included. The best performance of FC for predicting MH in UC was at cut-off range of 60–75 μg/g with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88 and pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.87 and 0.79, respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity values of cutoff range 180–250 μg/g for predicting MH in CD were 0.67 and 0.76, respectively. The AUC of 0.79 also revealed improved discrimination for identifying MH in CD with FC concentration. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Our meta-analysis has found that FC is a simple, reliable noninvasive marker for predicting MH in IBD patients. FC cutoff range 60–75 μg/g appears to have the best overall accuracy in UC patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 444-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joaquín Hinojosa ◽  
Fernando Muñoz ◽  
Gregorio Juan Martínez-Romero

Background: Adalimumab (ADA) is an anti-tumor necrosis factor agent that has been shown to be effective in inducing and maintaining remission in adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The relationship between the ADA trough levels and clinical efficacy has been demonstrated, but there is variability in the definition of the most suitable range for its clinical applicability. Summary: A review of published studies during the last 5 years on ADA serum levels and its relationship with the clinical outcome was performed. The studies selected included 7 observational studies, a systematic review, a meta-analysis and a post hoc analysis of a clinical trial. The reported ADA levels that discriminate patients in clinical remission from those with active disease range from 4.5 to 8 µg/mL. This therapeutic range varies when considering endoscopic remission (7.5 to >13.9 µg/mL). Although the sample of patients with ulcerative colitis is small, a tendency to reach higher levels of ADA is observed in both clinical and endoscopic remission. Key Messages: The optimal therapeutic cut-off point of serum ADA levels ranges from 4.5–5 to 12 µg/mL, where ADA levels are associated with an adequate clinical monitoring of the disease during maintenance therapy. These ranges vary according to the target, suggesting levels of 4.8 µg/mL as the cut-off for clinical remission and levels ≥7.5 µg/mL for mucosal healing/endoscopic response. Controlled prospective studies are required to determine the optimal therapeutic interval of ADA serum levels both as induction and as maintenance therapy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 1643-1649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Ma ◽  
Rowan Lumb ◽  
Emily V. Walker ◽  
Rae R. Foshaug ◽  
ThucNhi T. Dang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eriko Yasutomi ◽  
Toshihiro Inokuchi ◽  
Sakiko Hiraoka ◽  
Kensuke Takei ◽  
Shoko Igawa ◽  
...  

AbstractLeucine-rich alpha-2 glycoprotein (LRG) may be a novel serum biomarker for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The association of LRG with the endoscopic activity and predictability of mucosal healing (MH) was determined and compared with those of C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal markers (fecal immunochemical test [FIT] and fecal calprotectin [Fcal]) in 166 ulcerative colitis (UC) and 56 Crohn’s disease (CD) patients. In UC, LRG was correlated with the endoscopic activity and could predict MH, but the performance was not superior to that of fecal markers (areas under the curve [AUCs] for predicting MH: LRG: 0.61, CRP: 0.59, FIT: 0.75, and Fcal: 0.72). In CD, the performance of LRG was equivalent to that of CRP and Fcal (AUCs for predicting MH: LRG: 0.82, CRP: 0.82, FIT: 0.70, and Fcal: 0.88). LRG was able to discriminate patients with MH from those with endoscopic activity among UC and CD patients with normal CRP levels. LRG was associated with endoscopic activity and could predict MH in both UC and CD patients. It may be particularly useful in CD.


2016 ◽  
Vol 150 (4) ◽  
pp. S555-S556
Author(s):  
Christopher Ma ◽  
Rowan Lumb ◽  
Rae Foshaug ◽  
ThucNhi T. Dang ◽  
Sanam Verma ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S16-S16
Author(s):  
Erin Crawford ◽  
Catherine Gestrich ◽  
Sindhoosha Malay ◽  
Thomas Sferra ◽  
Shahrazad Saab ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment strategies have evolved to target mucosal healing, which has been shown to be associated with clinical remission and reduced complications. Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a non-invasive marker of intestinal inflammation, and has been shown to correlate with disease activity in IBD patients, though values which correlate with mucosal healing vary across studies. We aim to examine the association of quantitative FC levels with endoscopic and histologic severity, and compare FC in IBD patients with endoscopic remission with a control population. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who had a FC completed between 30 and 1 days before colonoscopy at UH Rainbow Babies and Children’s Hospital between 2014 and 2018. IBD patients had disease severity endoscopically graded using the SES-CD or Mayo UC score, and had disease severity histologically graded using the Geboes method. Severity was classed as no disease, mild, moderate or severe. FC values of IBD patients with mucosal healing and the control population (those without gastrointestinal pathology or diagnosis on evaluation) were compared. Results 331 cases were included in the study; 107 IBD cases and 224 controls. 63 patients (19%) had a diagnosis of Crohn’s disease (CD) and 44 patients (13%) had ulcerative colitis (UC). When assessing endoscopic scoring of IBD patients, the median FC was lowest in those with no disease (181 ug/g), followed by those with mild and moderate disease (499, 599 ug/g) and highest in those with severe disease (921 ug/g). There was significance comparing no disease to moderate and severe disease (p=0.019, 0.003), and between mild and severe disease (p=0.012). When assessing histology, the median FC was lowest in IBD patients with no disease (328 ug/g), followed by those with mild and moderate disease (399 ug/g, 674 ug/g) and highest in those with severe disease (895 ug/g). There was significance comparing no disease to moderate and severe disease (p=0.021, 0.018). In CD patients, there was significance in FC between no disease and moderate and severe disease (p=0.047, 0.0047) on endoscopic scoring. In UC patients, there was significance in FC between no disease and moderate disease (p=0.023) for histologic scoring. When comparing FC of endoscopically normal patients, the control group had a significantly lower median FC than the IBD population with endoscopic remission (43 ug/g vs 181 ug/g, p=0.018). Conclusion FC showed association with disease severity on gross endoscopy and histology and significance between severities in our IBD cohort. Additionally, normal cut-off values of FC may depend on the presence or absence of underlying disease. While larger studies are needed, this noninvasive test may help mitigate frequency of invasive procedures.


Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Małgorzata Krzystek-Korpacka ◽  
Radosław Kempiński ◽  
Mariusz Bromke ◽  
Katarzyna Neubauer

Mucosal healing (MH) is the key therapeutic target of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The evaluation of MH remains challenging, with endoscopy being the golden standard. We performed a comprehensive overview of the performance of fecal-, serum-, and urine-based biochemical markers in colonic IBD to find out whether we are ready to replace endoscopy with a non-invasive but equally accurate instrument. A Pubmed, Web of Knowledge, and Scopus search of original articles as potential MH markers in adults, published between January 2009 and March 2020, was conducted. Finally, 84 eligible studies were identified. The most frequently studied fecal marker was calprotectin (44 studies), with areas under the curves (AUCs) ranging from 0.70 to 0.99 in ulcerative colitis (UC) and from 0.70 to 0.94 in Crohn`s disease (CD), followed by lactoferrin (4 studies), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (3 studies), and lipocalin-2 (3 studies). The most frequently studied serum marker was C-reactive protein (30 studies), with AUCs ranging from 0.60 to 0.96 in UC and from 0.64 to 0.93 in CD. Fecal calprotectin is an accurate MH marker in IBD in adults; however, it cannot replace endoscopy and the application of calprotectin is hampered by the lack of standardization concerning the cut-off value. Other markers are either not sufficiently accurate or have not been studied extensively enough.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document