scholarly journals One-trial excitatory backward conditioning as assessed by conditioned suppression of licking in rats: Concurrent observations of lick suppression and defensive behaviors

1987 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 212-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
John J. B. Ayres ◽  
Christopher Haddad ◽  
Melody Albert
Keyword(s):  
Conditioned Suppression ◽  
Defensive Behaviors ◽  
Backward Conditioning ◽  
Lick Suppression

scholarly journals Effects of a backward conditioning procedure following acquisition on extinction of conditioned suppression

1973 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles K. Burdick ◽  
James P. James
Keyword(s):  
Conditioned Suppression ◽  
Conditioning Procedure ◽  
Backward Conditioning

Overshadowing of subsequent events and recovery thereafter

2000 ◽  
Vol 53 (2b) ◽  
pp. 149-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel C. Burger ◽  
Haney Mallemat ◽  
Ralph R. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Relationship ◽  
Further Training ◽  
Forward Conditioning ◽  
First Order ◽  
Order Conditioning ◽  
Backward Conditioning ◽  
The Us ◽  
Express Information ◽  
Lick Suppression ◽  
Relationship Of

Four experiments using a conditioned lick suppression preparation with rats were conducted to examine whether overshadowing of subsequent events could be obtained in Pavlovian backward conditioning (i.e. unconditioned stimulus [US] before conditioned stimulus [CS]), and to determine whether such overshadowing could be reversed without further training with the overshadowed CS, as has been reported in overshadowing of antecedent events. In Experiment 1, a backward-conditioned CS overshadowed a second backward-conditioned CS. Two posttraining manipulations, extinction of the overshadowing CS (Experiment 2) and shifting of the temporal relationship of the overshadowing CS to the US (Experiment 3), increased responding to the overshadowed CS. These results constitute the first unambiguous demonstration of stimulus competition between subsequent events using first-order conditioning, and they show that, like overshadowing with forward conditioning, such overshadowing is due, at least in part if not completely, to a failure to express information that had been acquired.

Excitatory Backward Conditioning in Conditioned Punishment and Conditioned Suppression in Rats

1986 ◽  
Vol 99 (3) ◽  
pp. 367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas A. Williams ◽  
Dennis G. Dyck ◽  
Robert W. Tait
Keyword(s):  
Conditioned Suppression ◽  
Backward Conditioning

CRITICAL FUSION FREQUENCY IN RHESUS MONKEYS USING THE CONDITIONED SUPPRESSION TECHNIQUE.

1967 ◽  
Author(s):  
STEPHEN A. SHUMAKE ◽  
JAMES C. SMITH ◽  
HENRY L. TAYLOR
Keyword(s):  
Conditioned Suppression ◽  
Rhesus Monkeys ◽  
Fusion Frequency ◽  
Suppression Technique ◽  
Critical Fusion Frequency

Backward conditioning in man and the criteria of conditioning

1976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ctibor Dostalek
Keyword(s):  
Backward Conditioning

Functional alteration of opioid receptor subtypes in the mice exhibited conditioned suppression in motility

1985 ◽  
Vol 54 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 263-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
T KAMEYAMA ◽  
T NABESHIMA ◽  
H KAMEI ◽  
K MATSUNO
Keyword(s):  
Opioid Receptor ◽  
Conditioned Suppression ◽  
Receptor Subtypes ◽  
Opioid Receptor Subtypes ◽  
Functional Alteration

Corrigendum to “Serotonin in the dorsal periaqueductal gray inhibits panic-like defensive behaviors in rats exposed to acute hypoxia” [Neuroscience 307 (2015) 191–198]

Neuroscience ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 310 ◽  
pp. 752
Author(s):  
A. Spiacci ◽  
T. de Oliveira Sergio ◽  
G.S.F. da Silva ◽  
M.L. Glass ◽  
L.C. Schenberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Hypoxia ◽  
Periaqueductal Gray ◽  
Dorsal Periaqueductal Gray ◽  
Defensive Behaviors

scholarly journals The effects of morphine on conditioned suppression in rhesus monkeys

1969 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen G. Holtzman ◽  
Julian E. Villarreal
Keyword(s):  
Conditioned Suppression ◽  
Rhesus Monkeys

Inhibitory Conditioning Resulting from a Reduction in the Magnitude of Reinforcement

1982 ◽  
Vol 34 (3b) ◽  
pp. 163-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Cotton ◽  
Glyn Goodall ◽  
N. J. Mackintosh
Keyword(s):  
Stimulus Control ◽  
Shock Intensity ◽  
Conditioned Suppression ◽  
Summation Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Conditioned Inhibitor ◽  
Inhibitory Conditioning ◽  
Experimental Subjects ◽  
The Difference

Five experiments, all employing conditioned suppression in rats, studied inhibitory conditioning to a stimulus signalling a reduction in shock intensity. Experimental subjects were conditioned to a tone signalling a 1·0 mA shock and to a tone-light compound signalling a 0·4 mA shock. On a summation test in which it alleviated the suppression maintained by a third stimulus also associated with the 1·0 mA shock, the light was established as a conditioned inhibitor. Retardation tests gave ambiguous results: the light was relatively slow to condition when paired, either alone or in conjunction with another stimulus, with the 0·4 mA shock, but the difference from a novel stimulus control group was not significant. Two final experiments found no evidence at all of inhibition on a summation test in which the light was presented in conjunction with a stimulus that had itself been associated with the 0·4 mA shock. The results of these experiments have implications for the question of what animals learn during the course of inhibitory conditioning.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document