scholarly journals Reaction time analysis of discrimination of direction of line by the pigeon

1969 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 171-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ray Over
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Reaction Time Analysis ◽  
Time Analysis

Reaction time analysis of simple mental tasks: A general approach

1985 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jo P.M. Pieters
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Reaction Time Analysis ◽  
Time Analysis ◽  
Mental Tasks

scholarly journals The perception of voice-initiating gestures

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria-Josep Solé
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Sound Change ◽  
Spanish Speakers ◽  
Reaction Time Analysis ◽  
Time Analysis ◽  
Phonetic Variation ◽  
Oral Pressure ◽  
Sound Patterns

AbstractThis study examines how variation in production is perceived and then (re)interpreted by listeners, thus providing the link between phonetic variation and sound change. We investigate whether listeners can detect the nasal leak that may accompany utterance-initial voiced stops in Spanish, and reinterpret it as a nasal segment. Such reinterpretation may account for a number of sound patterns involving emergent nasals adjacent to voiced stops in oral contexts. Oral pressure, nasal/oral airflow, and audio were recorded for utterance-initial /b d p t/ produced by 10 Spanish speakers. Tokens showing different degrees of nasal leak (nasal C, maximum, medium, and no nasal leak) were placed intervocalically, where both /C/ and /NC/ may occur. The stimuli were presented to Spanish listeners for identification as /VNCV/ or /V(C)CV/. Identification results indicate a higher number of VNCV responses with incremental changes in nasal leak in voiced but not voiceless stimuli. Reaction time analysis showed shorter latencies to nasal identification for larger velum leak stimuli. The results suggest that listeners can `hear' the nasal leak and fail to relate it to voicing initiation, interpreting a nasal segment. Thus a gesture aimed at facilitating voicing initiation may be interpreted as a new target goal.

scholarly journals A choice reaction time analysis of spatial frequency discrimination

1989 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 1575-1586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark W. Greenlee ◽  
Bruno G. Breitmeyer
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Choice Reaction Time ◽  
Frequency Discrimination ◽  
Reaction Time Analysis ◽  
Time Analysis

Short Report: Reaction Time Analysis with Outlier Exclusion: Bias Varies with Sample Size

1991 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 907-912 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff Miller
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Response Time ◽  
Sample Size ◽  
Response Times ◽  
Short Report ◽  
Reaction Time Analysis ◽  
Time Analysis ◽  
Skewed Distributions ◽  
Sample Average ◽  
Standard Deviations

To remove the influence of spuriously long response times, many investigators compute “restricted means”, obtained by throwing out any response time more than 2.0, 2.5, or 3.0 standard deviations from the overall sample average. Because reaction time distributions are skewed, however, the computation of restricted means introduces a bias: the restricted mean underestimates the true average of the population of response times. This problem may be very serious when investigators compare restricted means across conditions with different numbers of observations, because the bias increases with sample size. Simulations show that there is substantial differential bias when comparing conditions with fewer than 10 observations against conditions with more than 20. With strongly skewed distributions and a cutoff of 3.0 standard deviations, differential bias can influence comparisons of conditions with even more observations.

Responding to adjective check list items: A reaction time analysis

1991 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 523-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manfred Amelang ◽  
Klaus Eisenhut ◽  
Heiner Rindermann
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Reaction Time Analysis ◽  
Check List ◽  
Time Analysis ◽  
Adjective Check List

scholarly journals Interference in Geometrical Stoop like Task among Different Handed Persons

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashwini Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Visual Perception ◽  
Congruency Effect ◽  
Visual Fields ◽  
Reaction Times ◽  
Stroop Interference ◽  
Reaction Time Analysis ◽  
Time Analysis ◽  
Interference Condition ◽  
Accuracy Rates

The Geometrical Stroop like task was administered to study the amount of interference in different handed persons in naming geometrical word and their shape when stimuli were presented in two different conditions congruent and incongruent in two visual fields (RVF and LVF). It was hypothesized that, the ability of visual perception can be differing of a person in terms of their handedness. 149 subjects were voluntary participated in this study in which 80 subjects were predominantly Right handed and rest of them were non-right handed, between 17 and 21 years old. Each pair of stimulus was presented for 180msec preceded by a fixation dot for 2000msec. Subjects were asked to respond as fast and as accurately as they could either the geometrical words or the shape or both, depending upon the conditions. Reaction times of correct responses were analyzed. As expected, the results of this study on the basis of Stroop-like experiment give us enough findings in support of hypothesis. The findings of current study indicate that congruency effect in both of the groups. A significantly higher accuracy rates were obtained in non right handed person under the Stroop interference condition. Under this same condition, reaction time analysis yielded also significant differences between two groups.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document