scholarly journals Object-motion sensitivity loss due to motion in the peripheral visual field

1988 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-228
Author(s):  
James C. Mundt
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Object Motion ◽  
Peripheral Visual Field ◽  
Motion Sensitivity ◽  
Sensitivity Loss

Contrast sensitivity loss in the peripheral visual field following laser in situ keratomileusis

2007 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 1120-1122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Montés-Micó ◽  
Teresa Ferrer-Blasco
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Contrast Sensitivity ◽  
Laser In Situ Keratomileusis ◽  
Peripheral Visual Field ◽  
Sensitivity Loss

Visual field defects and myopic macular degeneration in Singapore adults with high myopia

2021 ◽  
pp. bjophthalmol-2020-318674
Author(s):  
Carla Lanca ◽  
Chen Hsin Sun ◽  
Rachel Chong ◽  
Yee Ling Wong ◽  
Monisha Esther Nongpiur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Macular Degeneration ◽  
High Myopia ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Visual Field Defects ◽  
Mean Deviation ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Sensitivity Loss ◽  
Fundus Photographs ◽  
Generalised Estimating Equations

AimsTo characterise the association between visual field (VF) defects and myopic macular degeneration (MMD) in highly myopic adults without glaucoma.MethodsParticipants (n=106; 181 eyes) with high myopia (HM; spherical equivalent ≤−5.0 D or axial length (AL) ≥26 mm), after excluding glaucoma and glaucoma suspects, from the Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Diseases-HM study were included in this cross-sectional study. Humphrey VF (central 24–2 threshold), cup-disc ratio (CDR) and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements were performed. Mean deviation (MD) and pattern SD (PSD), VF defects (normal or abnormal; p<0.05 in ≥3 non-edge contiguous locations) and pattern (eg, generalised sensitivity loss) were analysed. MMD presence was diagnosed from fundus photographs. Generalised estimating equations were used for analysing factors (MD, PSD, VF defects, CDR and IOP) associated with MMD.ResultsMean age was 55.4±9.9 years and 51.9% were women (AL=26.7±1.1 mm). MMD eyes had lower MD (−3.8±2.9 dB vs −1.1±1.4 dB) and higher PSD (2.8±1.7 dB vs 1.7±0.6 dB). A higher percentage of MMD eyes (n=48) had abnormal VF (62.5% vs 28.6%; p<0.001) compared with no MMD (n=133 eyes). VF pattern in MMD eyes was significantly different from eyes without MMD (p=0.001) with greater generalised sensitivity loss (53.3% vs 10.5%) and arcuate defects (16.7% vs 10.5%). In multivariate analyses, MD (OR=1.52) and PSD (OR=1.67) were significantly (p=0.003) associated with MMD, but VF defects were not associated with MMD.ConclusionHighly myopic adults with MMD may have VF loss when compared with highly myopic patients without MMD even in adults without glaucoma.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Central and Peripheral Visual Field Concordance in Glaucoma

2016 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 2797 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie L. Odden ◽  
Aleksandra Mihailovic ◽  
Michael V. Boland ◽  
David S. Friedman ◽  
Sheila K. West ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Peripheral Visual Field

scholarly journals Cortical responses to moderate- and high-speed gratings extending 60° in the peripheral visual field

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 1179
Author(s):  
Kyriaki Mikellidou ◽  
Francesca Frijia ◽  
Domenico Montanaro ◽  
Vincenzo Greco ◽  
David Burr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Peripheral Visual Field ◽  
Cortical Responses

scholarly journals Spatiotemporal effects of the visual attention on detecting a target smoothly appearing in the peripheral visual field

2005 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. 85-85
Author(s):  
K. Segawa ◽  
K. Uchikawa
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Visual Attention ◽  
Peripheral Visual Field

scholarly journals Pedestrian Guidance Model Using Body Sway and Optical Flow in Peripheral Visual Field

2013 ◽  
Vol 67 (12) ◽  
pp. J434-J440
Author(s):  
Norifumi Watanabe ◽  
Fumihiko Mori ◽  
Takashi Omori
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Optical Flow ◽  
Peripheral Visual Field ◽  
Body Sway ◽  
Guidance Model

Effect of Altered Central and Peripheral Visual Field Stimulation on Correct Recognition and Visual Evoked Response

1979 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard P. Mancuso ◽  
Albert F. Lawrence ◽  
Roger W. Hintze ◽  
Carroll T. White
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Evoked Response ◽  
Correct Recognition ◽  
Peripheral Visual Field ◽  
Field Stimulation ◽  
Visual Evoked Response ◽  
Visual Evoked

scholarly journals Optic-flow and egocentric-direction strategies in walking: Central vs peripheral visual field

2005 ◽  
Vol 45 (25-26) ◽  
pp. 3117-3132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen A. Turano ◽  
Dylan Yu ◽  
Lei Hao ◽  
John C. Hicks
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Optic Flow ◽  
Peripheral Visual Field ◽  
Egocentric Direction

Auditory Spatial Cueing in Visual Search Tasks: Effects of Amplitude, Contrast and Duration

1995 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Z. Strybel ◽  
Jan M. Boucher ◽  
Greg E. Fujawa ◽  
Craig S. Volp
Keyword(s):  
Visual Search ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Peripheral Visual Field ◽  
Search Performance ◽  
Spatial Cues ◽  
Spatial Cueing ◽  
Search Tasks ◽  
Auditory Spatial Cues

The effectiveness of auditory spatial cues in visual search performance was examined in three experiments. Auditory spatial cues are more effective than abrupt visual onsets when the target appears in the peripheral visual field or when the contrast of the target is degraded. The duration of the auditory spatial cue did not affect search performance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document