Abstract
Assessment of decision-making capacity is essential to respect older adult dignity, particularly concerning major decision such as ageing in place. To date, it is the clinician's assessment, based on a global analysis of his clinical evaluation and neuropsychological tasks, which enables decision-making assessment. Given the difficulty it represents, and the ethical and societal issues raised, the research question concerns the contribution of neuro-imaging technologies as an aid to the evaluation of decision-making capacity. We included in our proof-of-concept study 4 healthy older patients and 2 older patients with dementia (mild stage) followed in a memory clinic. Each of the participants completed neuropsychological tests with a focus on executive functions, anosognosia and judgemental skills. Next, they performed a decision-making task, the Balloon Assessment Risk Task (BART) in functional MRI, and, finally, they participated in a semi-structured interview completed with interview of their caregiver. For both patients, their referring geriatrician was questioned a priori on his assessment of their decision-making capacity. The results showed a common activation pattern in functional MRI between the patient considered competent in decision-making and the healthy subjects, unlike the patient who was not clinically competent. The qualitative analysis highlighted major anosognosia in both pathological situations, but decision-making in everyday life situations differed between the 2 patients. This study shows the feasibility, on a sensitive topic, to explore the potential contribution of functional neuroimaging and semi-directed interviews as tools. It also demonstrates the value of conducting mixed research, combining neurosciences and social science to explore complex clinical issues.
Overlapping and unique neural circuits are activated during perceptual decision making and confidence
