scholarly journals Disruption of visual feature binding in working memory

2010 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taiji Ueno ◽  
Richard J. Allen ◽  
Alan D. Baddeley ◽  
Graham J. Hitch ◽  
Satoru Saito
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Johnson ◽  
Richard John Allen

The question of how features are bound together in working memory has become a topic of much research in recent years. However, this is typically focused on visual and/or auditory stimuli. This study applies established feature binding procedures to investigate odour binding in working memory. Across three experiments, memory for intentionally and incidentally formed odour-colour pairings was tested. Experiment 1 showed that following explicit instruction to remember the odour-colour combinations, young adults can recall lists of 3-odour-colour pairings at levels above that of chance and exhibit a recency advantage for the last pairing in the list. In Experiment 2 participants were asked to prioritise the first pairing in the list or treat all list items equally. We observed only limited evidence of prioritisation affecting the serial position function. Experiment 3 explored whether odour-colour binding can be incidentally formed. Using a yes/no recognition procedure, accuracy did not differ for positive test probes that were presented in the same (bound) or different (unbound) colour to encoding (although some weak recency effects were shown with confidence ratings). Taken together, these findings suggest that odour-colour bindings can be formed in working memory, but functionality may be limited compared to that of visual feature binding.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 185a
Author(s):  
Yoko Higuchi ◽  
Naotsugu Tsuchiya ◽  
Ryota Kanai ◽  
Kazuhisa Shibata

1998 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip T Quinlan

Cortex ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. 50-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean J. Fallon ◽  
Rozemarijn M. Mattiesing ◽  
Nina Dolfen ◽  
Sanjay G. Manohar ◽  
Masud Husain

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 125-147
Author(s):  
Christopher F. Masciari

The phenomenal overflow debate is a debate about the richness of phenomenal consciousness. There are two candidate views: the rich view and the sparse view. The rich view says phenomenal consciousness outstrips access consciousness and the contents of working memory. The sparse view denies this. Moreover, according to some conceptions of the sparse view, the subjective impression of richness depends on scene statistics and the refrigerator-light illusion. The purpose of this paper is to show there are additional resources available to the sparse view in accommodating intuitions of richness that have yet to be fully appreciated by participants in the debate. To this end, research pertaining to feature binding and activity-silent working memory will be discussed.


2005 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 591-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenza S. Colzato ◽  
Sabrina Fagioli ◽  
Vicki Erasmus ◽  
Bernhard Hommel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document